Jump to content

Talk:Clerks II

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Liface (talk | contribs) at 15:57, 28 July 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconFilm Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Does anyone know the name of the song in the trailer?

--In the internet exclusive trailer, the song is a heavy metal version of the cartoon theme. In the theatrical trailer, the song is Jerk It Out by The Caesars.

  • Judging from this movie, quickstop burned down.

http://clerksii.com/movies/firewalk560.mov

--New Clerks II poster [1]

o.o;

Some idiot completely changed this to some Rap Music CD shit that has nothing to do with the topic.. someone fix it plz? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 12.226.31.184 (talkcontribs) . 12:39, 21 July 2006

The english wikipedia had a database error earlier today. Luckily it seems to be all fixed again. Garion96 (talk) 23:39, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tiny censorship

Yeah, this probably won't go over too well on a Smith page (I understand), but please, let's keep the curse out of the Siegel quote. This is supposed to be a "professional"-type encyclopedia we're helping make. A tasteful (explitave) should work well, and if anyone asks, pretend I'm quoting J&SBSB on this one, k? Gspawn 14:11, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, Profanity on Wikipedia is not to be censored. --Liface 15:26, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's a QUOTE, sir. It can not be changed under any circumstances. If you want to talk about unprofessional behavior, go see Siegel. - Max

SNAP!- Optimus Mike

I see absolutely no reason to taunt the fellow - he raised a perfectly reasonable point which, we decided a long time ago, happened not to be the best way of going about things. -MBlume 06:09, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, but the notion of a *tiny* bit censorship (an oxymoron), especially on Wikipedia, is absurd. -Max

Trivia section

I'm trimming this, it's getting ludicrous. --Liface 18:02, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added a warning. If you would like to add trivia to the section, please post it here. --Liface 15:57, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]