Jump to content

User talk:Bilorv/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bilorv (talk | contribs) at 15:40, 2 June 2015. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 5

Archive created by Bilorv at 17:07, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Archive updated by Bilorv at 09:07, 29 May 2015 (UTC) and at 15:39, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Evans Quinn

Hi Bilorv. Thanks for reviewing my Evans Quinn article. You've placed a POV tag on the page but not noted on the talk page what the dispute is. Could you please elaborate (here, there, my talk page, wherever!) and I'll try and address the problem. Regards danno_uk 21:20, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

To be honest, I've not got a clue. I remember looking at the page but certainly don't remember making any changes - much less placing a POV tag on a perfectly neutral article. I was using Special:NewPagesFeed for the first time so it's possible I was testing/looking at something and misclicked or meant to click "cancel" but didn't. I've removed the tag. Sorry for any confusion. Bilorv (talk) 22:10, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
No worries, I'm sure many are the times that I've been patrolling Recent Changes, hit the wrong button on Twinkle and warned people about all sorts of infractions that they're clearly not guilty of! Thanks for the prompt response, much appreciated. danno_uk 22:43, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Overlinking

Your plot synopses are generally good, but you're linking too many words unnecessarily. For example, common English words don't need to linked. Cat, dog, boat, food: we all know what these words mean. Existentialism, iconoclasm, dichotomy, superconductor: these are rather rare or complex words that might need to be linked. It's not a big deal, but a large number of linked words can distract readers and leave them confused as to what the key concepts are. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:05, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Okay, right. These are some links from the plot synopsis I wrote for "The Hawking Excitation".

Email, Engineer, Higgs boson particle, Halloween, Card tricks, Belt buckles, Uniform fetishism (linked from "French maid costume"), Shopping

The words "email" and "engineer" might be a bit too much, but you also removed links from "card tricks", "belt buckles", "uniform fetishism". You also left some links there, like "Halloween" and "shopping". I have briefly looked at WP:OVERLINK before, but my problem is where to draw the line. I would have thought that if "belt buckles" was removed, "shopping" and "Halloween" would have been too. Does "Higgs boson particle" deserve a link any more than "card tricks" does, especially if neither is essential to understanding the plot? I agree that I put too many links in there, but am not quite sure why some specific examples should/shouldn't be included. Bilorv (talk) 09:22, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
Card tricks and belt buckles are too common. I left shopping? That was an error on my part, then. Thanks for spotting that. Halloween could be useful for non-American readers, who might not understand the American holiday. I'm pretty sure that card tricks exist in the whole world, however. Complex physics concepts certainly should be linked, and, if understanding is necessary, they should also be briefly explained. Here, it's not terribly important what it is, because it's a stand-in for "complicated scientific theory", and it could have been any complex-sounding theory. Descriptions of such MacGuffins would be undue. I agree that it's confusing at first, and it's very tempting to link indiscriminately. You can get a lot of practice and help from Tony1's tutorials on his user page. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:34, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Heroes of Olympus

Sorry, I was on my phone so it is incredibly hard to mention things. I removed it due to a lack of sources which you added in when you reinserted the section, so thanks and sorry for not putting an explanation on the page itself--Ditto51 (My Talk Page) 07:01, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for clearing that up. Bilorv (talk) 07:04, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

List of The Big Bang Theory characters

Thanks for your edit at List of The Big Bang Theory characters. I fear we have a fan trying to insert herself into the article. She left a link to a facebook page at Talk:The Big Bang Theory a few days ago,[2] and the reply that she left on her talk page was rather ... illuminating.[3] --AussieLegend () 18:54, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

The Irish Mother

Her surname is "McConnell" an Irish surname, so therefore the character is of Irish descent. many fictional characters with Irish names are placed in the category:Fictional American people of Irish descent, sometimes just based on the names, it doesn't have to be referenced on the show, but the Aldrin character is in the category:Fictional American people of Swedish descent so go tell the person who put them in the category off, instead of me, I'm only helping people understand the portrayals of fictional Irish Americans in television. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.202.12.58 (talk) 15:05, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

@90.202.12.58: It sounds like original research to me. I would think that it should have to be referenced on the show; do you have any policies or links which say you can judge their descent by their name alone? BTW, there's no need to get defensive - I merely didn't understand your reasoning. Also, you made the edit, so if I was trying to "tell [anyone] off", it would be you, rather than "the person who put them in the category" you seem to be trying to shift blame to. Bilorv (Talk)(Contribs) 15:15, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

MOS:LEAD

Hi, Do you think we have a Talk page consensus on MOS:LEAD to add in new wording to the policy page? I've never made a change to a policy page, and I don't want to face administrative sanctions for making the change. Thanks!OnBeyondZebrax (talk) 21:02, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

A page you started (Shouldn't You Be in School?) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Shouldn't You Be in School?, Bilorv!

Wikipedia editor KTo288 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Needs reliable third party references, rather than just the publishers own website.

To reply, leave a comment on KTo288's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Organic acid

"The lead of an article should be as concise as possible and only contain information repeated in more detail later in the article"

agree, but why didn't you fix the original article?209.86.76.253 (talk) 09:17, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
I'm sorry. I probably should have fixed the article myself. I was using an automated program and didn't think to move the information to its own subsection. — Bilorv (Talk)(Contribs) 16:25, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

DYK for The Convention Conundrum

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 09:21, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

The Game...

...is still watching you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.197.120.205 (talk) 10:54, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Thank you!

Hi, Adam. I want to thank you for all of the hard work you put into reviewing Caldas da Rainha. Your suggestions were extremely helpful in improving the article. I am grateful for your contributions. —Nelson Ricardo (talk) 12:49, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Happy Halloween!!!

Wilhelmina Will has given you some caramel and a candy apple! Caramel and candy-coated apples are fun Halloween treats, and promote WikiLove on Halloween. Hopefully these have made your Halloween (and the proceeding days) much sweeter. Happy Halloween!

'"On Psych, A USA Network TV series Episode 8, The Tao of Gus, Season 6, Shawn refers to pumpkins as "Halloween Apples" because he thinks all round fruits are a type of apple.


If Trick-or-treaters come your way, add {{subst:Halloween apples}} to their talkpage with a spoooooky message!


Cheers! "We could read for-EVER; reading round the wiki!" (talk) 18:03, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Congrats on being a nerd

Matt-cant-fail (talk) 19:14, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Poetry

I am sorry if my poetry has offended you, it was meant as a compliment. I hope this not cause any tension between us. Have a good day and please keep reviewing articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matt-cant-fail (talkcontribs) 17:06, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Congratul8tions on the gr8 banter m8, I can rel8

Regarding your contributions to my talk page

"... Ms Widdecombe ... will learn how a Victorian coaching inn was run, by getting their hands dirty. / There are horses to be groomed, coaches cleaned, ... chamber pots [jordans] emptied and landlord's scams to be learned." [1]

"...the sleeping young man with the jordan under the bed..."

Why, they will allow us ne'er a jordan, / and then we leak in your chimney; / and your chamber-lie breeds fleas like a loach.​

Shakespeare: Henry IV, Pt. I, II, i.

Jooorrrrdddaaannnnnnn

Bävrilina

Hello Bilorv, so delightful to speak to you again regarding your edits to my talk page.

Before I start, I would like to say that I appreciate the WikiLove (no homo – well, maybe 3–4 homo, 5 on a good day). However, in your signing off on my talk page, you had the phrase "jordan smells" in superscript, with a wikilink to the email address associated with your Wikipedia account.


Bilorv(talk)(c)(jordan smells) 2k15 (UTC)

Although I am questioning as to why this phrase leads to your email (no matter how saucy it may be), I thought I should write to you a quick few love letters criticisms of your erotic contributions to my talk page.

Firstly, as "jordan" is a well-known archaic term for a chamber pot ([4]), one should not be suprised that they smell, considering the amount of faecal matter and urine that they shall absorb over their lifetime. However, I have three objections to this being placed on my user page:

  1. Grammar – "jordan smells" does not make grammatical sense. The correct phrase should be "jordans smell", unless you are discussing a unique odour/aroma of jordans known as a "jordan smell" in its plural form; this should, in my opinion, be replaced with the phrase "the smell of jordans", in order to prevent any ambiguity regarding the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, Katie Price or the Norwegian toothbrush suppliers;
  2. WP:NPOV – adding the fact that "jordans smell" on my talk page is undue weight, as the rest of the talk page (as of now) does not mention chamber pots, or any lavatorial devices;
  3. WP:COMMONNAME – this guideline states that Ambiguous or inaccurate names for the article subject ... are often avoided. As stated before, a "jordan" may be somewhat ambiguous to the less learned reader.

However, I shall always follow your advice in "engaging in more greight bansevener" on Wikipedia. – Zumoarirodoka (talk) 15:17, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

merci beaucoup, mon petit chou

Thank you Bilorv, for your reply on my userpage. I will keep your message in mind when editing Wikipedia, and I enjoyed your ironic Wikilinking much more than I should have. However, I would just like to clarify the following:

  1. I would have formatted the quote boxes on the right, but unfortunately that would require Ann Widdecombe to be on the left for once; an irony that not even I could stand for.[note 1] And I know you're disappointed in me – I'm disappointed in myself for that faux pas, I must admit;
  2. I promise to you that from now on, I shall never mention Katie Price again;
  3. I had always thought you were an unofficial member of the Really Reformed Church of Wikipedia, but I guess I'm wrong. I am also a 6 (or thereabouts) on the Dawkins scale, so there. Stick that in your nonexistent pipe (see: Ceci n'est pas une pipe), and smoke it;[note 2]
  4. I shall refrain from creating misleading or patronising Wikilinks and comply with all the rules that you have notified me of;
  5. I shall always use my [references] correctly;[note 3]
  6. I reject that notion of "dated expressions". All of my expressions are contemporary, as to be expected from the youth of today;
  7. I shall not put any more of your quotes in green, without asking for your consent first, or that of the Green Party of England and Wales.
  1. ^ I'm usually seated when using Wikipedia, anyway.
  2. ^ Although it's best not to get the Dawkins scale and the Kinsey scale mixed up – been there, done that one!
  3. ^ Ironically, you placed punctuation after your {{dummy ref}} template! Oh, the hilarity! What a n00b!