Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darshan raval

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Person with no notability to be found. It appears that Darshan Raval has been salted already by the way. Wgolf (talk) 16:25, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 17:34, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 17:34, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - He was the runner up of India's Raw Star. That is probably the most significant thing he has done so far which is not enough to pass WP:GNG. — Yash! ^(Y) 18:24, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

India's Raw Star - I overhead the name some time ago since this guy lives a few blocks away from my place. — Yash! ^(Y) 01:22, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Based on the coverage the subject has received so far. He has composed songs for 2 Gujarati films also. --Skr15081997 (talk) 15:51, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment He has also won Gujarati Screen & Stage Awards 2014 for best playback singer male for Bey Yaar. Besides that he has sung 2 songs for Ek Veer Ki Ardaas...Veera & 2 Gujarati language films Romance Complicated and Bey Yaar (both 2014).--Skr15081997 (talk) 05:48, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and maybe draft - Based on the coverage given by Skr15081997, I think there isn't much coverage past the usual excitement after a competition; the film composing is good but he's barely beginning so I'd give him some more time. A usual News search found results but it fades at page 2. SwisterTwister talk 17:34, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG. May become notable in the future but isn't as of now. Philg88 ^♦talk 06:49, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That page says "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list." Yes the subject has received that coverage.--Skr15081997 (talk) 07:14, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]