Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Gell
- Mary Gell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Main notability would come from being a co-founder of War on Want, person not found in article nor in history section of website. WP:BIO not met. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 13:04, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:20, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:20, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:20, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:20, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- This, from the archive that has some of her papers, a brief bio [1]. She is listed in old medical registers, and as a Japanese POW during WWII. That's all I have found. Early-ish woman medical graduate. Medical missionary in China. POW. It's certainly not a vanity article. User:Loriendrew, What so you tunk? Given Wikipedia:Does deletion help, should we add the material form the archive to the book now on the page and leave it up?E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:43, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- The original author is nor blocked due to spam/advert (mass creation of one-line articles). I'm not convinced WP:GNG/WP:BIO is met if you remove the unverifiable notability claim given the sources provided.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 00:14, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep I've cleaned it up a bit, and War on Want is a hugely significant charity. --The Vintage Feminist (talk) 21:47, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. The Vintage Feminist (talk) 21:47, 3 June 2015 (UTC)