Jump to content

Pfaffian

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 70.72.144.66 (talk) at 00:29, 19 June 2015 (Added dubious tag to attribution to Thomas Muir in the Introduction). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

In mathematics, the determinant of a skew-symmetric matrix can always be written as the square of a polynomial in the matrix entries. This polynomial is called the Pfaffian of the matrix. The term Pfaffian was introduced by Cayley (1852) who named them after Johann Friedrich Pfaff. The Pfaffian is nonvanishing only for 2n × 2n skew-symmetric matrices, in which case it is a polynomial of degree n.

Explicitly, for a skew-symmetric matrix A,

which was first proved by Thomas Muir in 1882 (Muir 1882).[dubiousdiscuss]

The fact that the determinant of any skew symmetric matrix is the square of a polynomial can be shown by writing the matrix as a block matrix, then using induction and examining the Schur complement, which is skew symmetric as well. [1]

Examples

(3 is odd, so Pfaffian of B is 0)

The Pfaffian of a 2n × 2n skew-symmetric tridiagonal matrix is given as

(Note that any skew-symmetric matrix can be reduced to this form with all equal to zero, see Spectral theory of a skew-symmetric matrix)

Formal definition

Let A = {ai,j} be a 2n × 2n skew-symmetric matrix. The Pfaffian of A is defined by the equation

where S2n is the symmetric group and sgn(σ) is the signature of σ.

One can make use of the skew-symmetry of A to avoid summing over all possible permutations. Let Π be the set of all partitions of {1, 2, …, 2n} into pairs without regard to order. There are (2n − 1)!! such partitions. An element α ∈ Π can be written as

with ik < jk and . Let

be the corresponding permutation. Given a partition α as above, define

The Pfaffian of A is then given by

The Pfaffian of a n×n skew-symmetric matrix for n odd is defined to be zero, as the determinant of an odd skew-symmetric matrix is zero, since for a skew-symmetric matrix, , and for n odd, this implies .

Recursive definition

By convention, the Pfaffian of the 0×0 matrix is equal to one. The Pfaffian of a skew-symmetric 2n×2n matrix A with n>0 can be computed recursively as

where index i can be selected arbitrarily, is the Heaviside step function, and denotes the matrix A with both the i-th and j-th rows and columns removed.[2] Note how for the special choice this reduces to the simpler expression:

Alternative definitions

  • One can associate to any skew-symmetric 2n×2n matrix A ={aij} a bivector

where {e1, e2, …, e2n} is the standard basis of R2n. The Pfaffian is then defined by the equation

here ωn denotes the wedge product of n copies of ω.

Identities

For a 2n × 2n skew-symmetric matrix A

For an arbitrary 2n × 2n matrix B,

Substituting in this equation B = Am, one gets for all integer m

For a block-diagonal matrix

For an arbitrary n × n matrix M:

If A depends on some variable xi, then the gradient of a Pfaffian is given by

and the Hessian of a Pfaffian is given by

Properties

Pfaffians have the following properties, which are similar to those of determinants.

  • Multiplication of a row and a column by a constant is equivalent to multiplication of Pfaffian by the same constant.
  • Simultaneous interchange of two different rows and corresponding columns changes the sign of Pfaffian.
  • A multiple of a row and corresponding column added to another row and corresponding column does not change the value of Pfaffian.

These properties can be derived from the identity .

Applications

  • There exist programs for the numerical computation of the Pfaffian on various platforms (Python, Matlab, Mathematica) (Wimmer 2012).

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Ledermann, W. "A note on skew-symmetric determinants"
  2. ^ http://jesusmtz.public.iastate.edu/soliton/REPORT%202.pdf

References

  • Cayley, Arthur (1852). "On the theory of permutants". Cambridge and Dublin Mathematical Journal. VII: 40–51Template:Inconsistent citations {{cite journal}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)CS1 maint: postscript (link) Reprinted in Collected mathematical papers, volume 2.
  • Kasteleyn, P. W. (1961). "The statistics of dimers on a lattice. I. The number of dimer arrangements on a quadratic lattice". Physica. 27 (12): 1209–1225. doi:10.1016/0031-8914(61)90063-5. {{cite journal}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Propp, James (2004). "Lambda-determinants and domino-tilings". arXiv:math/0406301. {{cite arXiv}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Globerson, Amir; Jaakkola, Tommi (2007). "Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19". MIT PressTemplate:Inconsistent citations {{cite journal}}: |contribution= ignored (help); Cite journal requires |journal= (help); Invalid |ref=harv (help)CS1 maint: postscript (link).
  • Schraudolph, Nicol; Kamenetsky, Dmitry (2009). "Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 21". MIT PressTemplate:Inconsistent citations {{cite journal}}: |contribution= ignored (help); Cite journal requires |journal= (help); Invalid |ref=harv (help)CS1 maint: postscript (link).
  • Jeliss, G.P.; Chapman, Robin J. (1996). "Dominizing the Chessboard". The Games and Puzzles Journal. 2 (14): 204–5. {{cite journal}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Sellers, James A. (2002). "Domino Tilings and Products of Fibonacci and Pell numbers". Journal of Integer Sequences. 5 (1): 02.1.2. {{cite journal}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Wells, David (1997). The Penguin Dictionary of Curious and Interesting Numbers (revised ed.). p. 182. ISBN 0-14-026149-4. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Muir, Thomas (1882). A Treatise on the Theory of Determinants. Macmillan and Co. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help) Online
  • Parameswaran, S. (1954). "Skew-Symmetric Determinants". The American Mathematical Monthly. 61 (2): 116. JSTOR 2307800. {{cite journal}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Wimmer, M. (2012). "Efficient numerical computation of the Pfaffian for dense and banded skew-symmetric matrices". ACM Trans. Math. Software. 38: 30. arXiv:1102.3440. doi:10.1145/2331130.2331138. {{cite journal}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)