User:Hintha/Sandbox
History
The Burmese language is generally divided into three stages:
- Old Burmese dates from the 11th to the 16th century (Pagan and Ava dynasties)
- Middle Burmese from the 16th to the 18th century (Toungoo to early Konbaung dynasties);
- Modern Burmese from the mid-18th century to the present.
Ongoing developments in the Burmese script followed that of the spoken language.
Prehistory
The ancestors of the Burmans (Bamar), modern Burmese speakers, migrated southward from the Tibetan plateau to southwestern China (present-day Sichuan and Yunnan) between the 2nd to 9th centuries.[1] Between the 7th and 9th centuries, they settled in the Irrawaddy River valley, an area already settled by Tibeto-Burman speaking Pyu who had migrated to the region approximately 500 years earlier.[1]
The Burmans who had come down with the early 9th century Nanzhao raids of the Pyu states remained in Upper Burma. (Trickles of Burman migrations may have begun as early as the 7th century.[2]) Like that of the Pyu, the original home of Burmans prior to Yunnan is believed to be present-day Qinghai and Gansu provinces.[3][4] After the Nanzhao attacks had greatly weakened the Pyu city-states, large numbers of Burman warriors and their families entered the Pyu realm in the 830s and 840s and settled at the confluence of the Irrawaddy and Chindwin rivers, perhaps to help Nanzhao pacify the surrounding countryside.[5] Over the next two hundred years, the small principality gradually grew to include its immediate surrounding areas— to about 200 miles (320 km) north to south and 80 miles (130 km) from east to west by Anawrahta's accession in 1044. Historically verifiable Burmese history begins with Anawrahta's accession.[6]
Old Burmese
Old Burmese is the oldest attested stage of the Burmese language. Through contact with the Pyu and Mon peoples, Burmese speakers developed a writing system derived from the Brahmi script, which is the ancestral script of all the major Southeast Asian languages. The oldest extant inscription in Burmese is the Myazedi inscription, dated to 1113.
Old Burmese is defined by the following orthographic and phonetic features:
- Four medials (y, r, l, w)
- Four nasal finals (ng, ny, n, m)
- Four consonantal finals (k, c, t, p)
- The coalescing of preaspiration (h)
Early contact with the Mon (who spoke an Austronesian language), who had settled present-day Lower Burma by that time, has influenced both Burmese vocabulary and phonology.[1] Mon influence is found in the Burmese tonal system, which has adopted voice phonation or register as an additional tonal feature, aside from simple pitch (as noted in the 'creaky tone'), since this feature is atypical of Tibeto-Burman languages.[1]
Middle Burmese
Middle Burmese was the intermediate stage of the Burmese language, defined from the 16th to the 18th century (Toungoo to early Konbaung dynasties). Middle Burmese is defined by the following orthographic and phonetic features:
- Three medials: merger of l
- ry > r (1300s-1500s)
Modern Burmese
Modern Burmese began in the mid-18th century (beginnings of the Konbaung dynasty and is the form of Burmese used today.
Modern Burmese is defined by the following phonetic features:
- great consonantal shift:
- s > th
- c > dz > z
- c > ts > s
- ch > tsh > sh
- hr > sh
- hy > sh
- r > y (mid-1700s)
- ky > ky (early 1800s)
(such as the merging of the [-l-] and [-ɹ-] medials) rather than transformations in Burmese grammatical structure and phonology, which has not changed much from Old Burmese to modern Burmese.[7] For example, during the Pagan era, the medial [-l-] (Template:My) was transcribed in writing, which has been replaced by medials [-j-] (Template:My) and [-ɹ-] (Template:My) in modern Burmese (e.g. "school" in old Burmese Template:My ([klɔŋ] → Template:My ([tɕáʊɴ] in modern Burmese).[8]
Likewise written Burmese has preserved all nasalized finals ([-n, -m, -ŋ]), which have merged to [-ɴ] in spoken Burmese. (The exception is [-ɲ], which, in spoken Burmese, can be one of many open vowels ([i, e, ɛ]). Likewise, other consonantal finals ([-s, -p, -t, -k]) have been reduced to [-ʔ]. Similar mergers are seen in other Sino-Tibetan languages like Shanghainese, and to a lesser extent, Cantonese.)
Modern Burmese is defined by the following orthographic changes:
- tone marking standardization:
- removal of the ို-ဝ်/ဝ် final (after 1878)
- standardization of ည်/ဉ် designation (1970 by MLC)
- ဖ/ဘ/ဗ (1970 by MLC)
- ယ် (1970 by MLC)
Ongoing phonological changes: ွန်/ွတ် --> င် / စ် ဆ -- စ
CLEANUP
Old Burmese | 1800s | British | Modern |
---|---|---|---|
Template:My (i. / i) | Template:My (') | Template:My (') | Template:My (') |
Template:My (iy) | Template:My (') | Template:My (') | Template:My (') |
Template:My (y / ay) | Template:My (y / ) | Template:My (') | Template:My (') |
Template:My (u. / u) | Template:My (') | Template:My (') | Template:My (') |
Template:My (uiw) | Template:My (') | Template:My (ui) | Template:My (') |
Template:My (au) | Template:My (') | Template:My (') | Template:My (') |
Template:My (a) | Template:My (') | Template:My (') | Template:My (') |
Template:My (uy) | Template:My (') | Template:My (') | Template:My (') |
Template:My (wy / way) | Template:My (') | Template:My (') | Template:My (') |
Template:My (w / wa) | Template:My (') | Template:My (') | Template:My (') |
Final | 1200s | 1500s | 1800s | 1900s | 2000s |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
k | Template:My | Template:My (-ak [eʔ]) | |||
Template:My (-wak [weʔ]) |
|||||
Template:My (-auk [auʔ]) |
|||||
Template:My (-uik [aiʔ]) |
|||||
c | Template:My (-ac [iʔ]) | ||||
t | Template:My (-at [aʔ]) | ||||
Template:My (-wat [waʔ]/[uʔ]) | |||||
Template:My (-ut [ouʔ]) | |||||
Template:My (-it [eiʔ]) | |||||
p | Template:My (-p [aʔ] or [ɛʔ]) | ||||
Template:My (-wap [waʔ] or [uɴ]) | |||||
Template:My (-up [ouʔ]) | |||||
Template:My (-ip [eiʔ]) | |||||
ng | Template:My | ||||
Template:My | |||||
Template:My | |||||
Template:My | |||||
ny | Template:My | Template:My Template:My | |||
n | Template:My | ||||
Template:My | |||||
Template:My | |||||
Template:My | |||||
m | Template:My / Template:My | ||||
Template:My | |||||
Template:My | Template:My Template:My | ||||
Template:My |
Writing system
Burmese is written using the Burmese alphabet, which consists of 33 letters, and is written from left to right, with spaces separating each clause or phrase to enhance readability.[9][10] Characterized by its circular letters and diacritics, the Burmese script is an abugida, with every letter possessing an inherent vowel Template:My (a. [a̰] or [ə]).[10] As with other Brahmi scripts, Burmese consonants are arranged into six consonant groups called Template:My (wag), based on articulation. Tone markings, vowel modifications and medial consonants are written as diacritics, which are placed to the left, right, top, and bottom of letters.[7][10]
Written Burmese dates to the early Pagan period (9th to 10th centuries). The script was developed from either the Mon script in 1058[11] or the Pyu script in the 10th century.[12] (Both Mon and Pyu scripts are derivatives of the Brāhmī script.) The script has remained largely unchanged from its initial development, aside from the rounding of originally square characters.[13] The cursive, circular format that characterises the Burmese script today took hold in the 17th century when popular writing led to the wider use of palm leaves and folded paper known as parabaik (Template:My).[14][13]
Much of the orthography in written Burmese today can be traced back to Middle Burmese. Standardized tone marking was not achieved until the 18th century. From the 19th century onward, orthographers created spellers to reform Burmese spelling, because ambiguities arose over spelling sounds that had been merged.[7] During colonial rule under the British, Burmese spelling was standardized through dictionaries and spellers. The latest spelling authority, named the Myanma Salonpaung Thatpon Kyan (Template:My), was compiled in 1978 at the request of the Burmese government.[7]
Grammar
The basic word order of the Burmese language is subject-object-verb. Pronouns in Burmese vary according to the gender and status of the audience. Burmese is monosyllabic (i.e., every word is a root to which a particle but not another word may be prefixed).[15] Sentence structure determines syntactical relations and verbs are not conjugated. Instead they have particles suffixed to them. For example, the verb "to eat," Template:My (ca: [sà]) is itself unchanged when modified.
Adjectives
Burmese does not have adjectives per se. Rather, it has verbs that carry the meaning "to be X", where X is an English adjective. These verbs can modify a noun by means of the grammatical particle Template:My (tai. [dɛ̰]) in colloquial Burmese (literary form: Template:My sau: [θɔ́]), which is suffixed as follows:
- Colloquial: Template:My hkyau: tai. lu [tɕʰɔ́ dɛ̰ lù]
- Formal: Template:My hkyau: so: lu
- Gloss: "beautiful" + adjective particle + "person"
Adjectives may also form a compound with the noun (e.g. Template:My lu hkyau: [lù tɕʰɔ́] "person" + "be beautiful").
Comparatives are usually ordered: X + Template:My (htak pui [tʰeʔ pò]) + adjective, where X is the object being compared to. Superlatives are indicated with the prefix Template:My (a. [ʔə]) + adjective + Template:My (hcum: [zóʊɴ]).
Numerals follow the nouns they modify. Moreover, numerals follow several pronunciation rules that involve tone changes (low tone → creaky tone) and voicing shifts depending on the pronunciation of surrounding words. A more thorough explanation is found on Burmese numerals.
Verbs
The roots of Burmese verbs are almost always suffixed with at least one particle which conveys such information as tense, intention, politeness, mood, etc. Many of these particles also have formal/literary and colloquial equivalents. In fact, the only time in which no particle is attached to a verb is in imperative commands. However, Burmese verbs are not conjugated in the same way as most European languages; the root of the Burmese verb always remains unchanged and does not have to agree with the subject in person, number or gender.
The most commonly used verb particles and their usage are shown below with an example verb root Template:My (ca: [sá] "to eat"). Alone, the statement Template:My is imperative.
The suffix Template:My tai [dɛ̀] (literary form: Template:My sany [ðì]) can be viewed as a particle marking the present tense and/or a factual statement:
- Template:My (ca: tai [sá dɛ̀]) - "I eat"
The suffix Template:My (hkai. [ɡɛ̰]) denotes that the action took place in the past. However, this particle is not always necessary to indicate the past tense such that it can convey the same information without it. But to emphasize that the action happened before another event that is also currently being discussed, the particle becomes imperative. Note that the suffix Template:My (tai [dɛ̀]) in this case denotes a factual statement rather than the present tense:
- Template:My (ca: hkai. tai [sá ɡɛ̰ dɛ̀]) - I ate
The particle Template:My (ne [nè]) is used to denote an action in progression. It is equivalent to the English '-ing'"
- Template:My (ca: ne tai [sá nè dɛ̀]) - I am eating
This particle Template:My (pri [bjì]), which is used when an action that had been expected to be performed by the subject is now finally being performed, has no equivalent in English. So in the above example, if someone had been expecting you to eat and you have finally started eating, the particle Template:My is used as follows:
- Template:My ((ca.) ca: pri [(sə) sá bjì]) - I am (now) eating
The particle Template:My mai [mɛ̀] (literary form: Template:My many [mjì]) is used to indicate the future tense or an action which is yet to be performed:
- Template:My (ca: mai [sá mɛ̀]) - I will eat
The particle Template:My (tau. [dɔ̰]) is used when the action is about to be performed immediately when used in conjunction with Template:My. Therefore it could be termed as the "immediate future tense particle".
- Template:My (ca: tau. mai [sá dɔ̰ mɛ̀]) - I will eat (straight-away)
When Template:My is used alone, however, it is imperative:
- Template:My (ca: tau. [sá dɔ̰]) - Eat (now)
Verbs are negated by the particle Template:My (ma. [mə]), which is prefixed to the verb.[16] Generally speaking, other particles are suffixed to that verb, along with Template:My.
The verb suffix particle Template:My nai. [nɛ̰] (literary form: Template:My hnang. [n̥ɪ̰ɴ]) indicates a command:
- Template:My (ma.ca: nai. [məsá nɛ̰] Don't eat
The verb suffix particle Template:My (bhu: [bú]) indicates a statement:
- Template:My (ma.ca: bhu: [məsá bú]) - [I] don't eat
Nouns
Nouns in Burmese are pluralized by suffixing the particle Template:My (twe [dè] or [tè] if the word ends in a glottal stop) in colloquial Burmese or Template:My (mya: [mjà]) in formal Burmese. The particle Template:My (tou. [to̰]), which indicates a group of persons or things, is also suffixed to the modified noun. An example is below:
- Template:My (mrac [mjɪʔ]) - river
- Template:My (mrac twe [mjɪʔ tè]) - rivers (colloquial)
- Template:My (mrac mya: [mjɪʔ mjá]) - rivers (formal)
- Template:My (mrac tou: [mjɪʔ to̰]) - rivers
Plural suffixes are not used when the noun is quantified with a number.
"five children" Template:My Template:My Template:My hka.le: nga: yauk /kʰəlé ŋá jaʊʔ/ child five classifier
Although Burmese does not have grammatical gender (e.g. masculine or feminine nouns), a distinction is made between the sexes, especially in animals and plants, by means of suffix particles. Nouns are masculinized with the following particles: Template:My (hti: [tʰí]), Template:My (hpa [pʰa̰]), or Template:My (hpui [pʰò]), depending on the noun, and feminized with the particle Template:My (ma. [ma̰]). Examples of usage are below:
- Template:My (kraung hti: [tɕàʊɴ tʰí]) - male cat
- Template:My (kraung ma. [tɕàʊɴ ma̰]) - female cat
- Template:My (krak hpa. [tɕɛʔ pʰa̰]) - rooster/cock
- Template:My (htan: hpui [tʰáɴ pʰò]) - male toddy palm plant
Numerical classifiers
Like its neighboring languages such as Thai, Burmese uses numerical classifiers (also called measure words) when nouns are counted or quantified.[17] This approximately equates to English expressions such as "two slices of bread" or "a cup of coffee." The standard word order of quantified words is:
- noun + number + MEASURE WORD[17]
"5 children" Template:My Template:My Template:My [kʰəlé] [ŋà] [jaʊʔ] 'children' '5' MEASURE WORD
The word order is flipped for round numbers (numbers that end in zero), with the only exception to this rule being the number 10, which follows the standard word order:[17][18]
- noun + MEASURE WORD + number
"20 children" Template:My Template:My Template:My [kʰəlé] [əjaʊʔ] [ŋà] 'children' MEASURE WORD '20'
Measurements (e.g., time, distance, and length) such as "hour," (Template:My) "day," (Template:My) or "month," (Template:My) do not require classifiers, but are still subject to the round number rule.[19]
Below are some of the most commonly used classifiers in Burmese.
Burmese | MLC | IPA | Usage | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|---|
Template:My | yauk | [jaʊʔ] | for people | Used in informal context |
Template:My | u: | [ʔú] | for people | Used in formal context and also used for monks and nuns |
Template:My | pa: | [bá] | for people | Used exclusively for monks and nuns of the Buddhist order |
Template:My | kaung | [kàʊɴ] | for animals | |
Template:My | hku. | [kʰṵ] | general classifier | Used with almost all nouns except for animate objects |
Template:My | lum: | [lóʊɴ] | for round objects | |
Template:My | pra: | [pjá] | for flat objects | |
Template:My | cu. | [sṵ] | for groups | Can be [zṵ]. |
Particles
The Burmese language makes prominent usage of particles (called Template:My in Burmese), which are untranslatable words that are suffixed or prefixed to words to indicate level of respect, grammatical tense, or mood. According to the Myanmar–English Dictionary (1993), there are 449 particles in the Burmese language. For example, Template:My ([sáɴ]) is a grammatical particle used to indicate the imperative mood. While Template:My ("work" + particle indicating politeness) does not indicate the imperative, Template:My ("work" + particle indicating imperative mood + particle indicating politeness) does. Particles may be combined in some cases, especially those modifying verbs.
Some particles modify the word's part of speech. Among the most prominent of these is the particle Template:My ([ə]), which is prefixed to verbs and adjectives to form nouns or adverbs. For instance, the word Template:My means "to enter," but combined with Template:My, it means "entrance" (Template:My). Also, in colloquial Burmese, there is a tendency to omit the second Template:My in words that follow the pattern Template:My + noun/adverb + Template:My + noun/adverb, like Template:My, which is pronounced [əsʰaʊʔ ú] and formally pronounced [əsʰaʊʔ əòʊɴ].
Pronouns
Subject pronouns begin sentences, though the subject is generally omitted in the imperative forms and in conversation. Grammatically speaking, subject marker particles (Template:My ([ɡa̰] in colloquial, Template:My [θì] in formal) must be attached to the subject pronoun[20], although they are also generally omitted in conversation. Object pronouns must have an object marker particle (Template:My [ɡò] in colloquial, Template:My [á] in formal) attached immediately after the pronoun. Proper nouns are often substituted for pronouns. One's status in relation to the audience determines the pronouns used, with certain pronouns used for different audiences.
Polite pronouns are used to address elders, teachers and strangers, through the use of feudal-era third person pronouns in lieu of first and second person pronouns. In such situations, one refers to oneself in third person: Template:My (kya. nau [tɕənɔ̀]) for males, and Template:My (kya. ma. [tɕəma̰]) for females, both meaning "your servant") and refer to the addressee as Template:My (min [mɪ́ɴ]; "your highness"), Template:My (khang bya: [kʰəmjá]; "master lord")[21] or Template:My (hrang [ʃɪ̀ɴ]; "ruler/master").[22] So ingrained are these terms in the daily polite speech that people use them as the first and second person pronouns without giving a second thought to the root meaning of these pronouns.
When speaking to a person of the same status or of younger age, Template:My (nga [ŋà]; "I/me") and Template:My (nang [nɪ̀ɴ]; "you") may be used, although most speakers choose to use third person pronouns.[23] For example, an older person may use Template:My (dau le: [dɔ̀ lé]; "aunt") or Template:My (u: lei: [ʔú lé]; "uncle") to refer to himself, while a younger person may use either သား (sa: [θá]; son) or Template:My (sa.mi: [θəmí]; daughter).
The basic pronouns are:
Person | Singular | Plural* | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Informal | Formal | Informal | Formal | |
First person | Template:My nga ([ŋà]) |
Template:My‡ kywan to ([tɕənɔ̀]) Template:My† kywan ma. ([tɕəma̰]) |
Template:My nga tui. ([ŋà do̰]) |
Template:My‡ kywan to tui. ([tɕənɔ̀ do̰]) Template:My† kywan ma. tui. ([tɕəma̰ do̰]) |
Second person | Template:My nang ([nɪ̀ɴ]) Template:My mang: ([mɪ́ɴ]) |
Template:My‡ khang bya: ([kʰəmjá]) Template:My† hrang ([ʃɪ̀ɴ]) |
Template:My nang tui. ([nɪ̀ɴ do̰]) |
Template:My‡ khang bya: tui. ([kʰəmjá]) Template:My† hrang tui. ([ʃɪ̀ɴ]) |
Third person | Template:My su ([θù]) |
Template:My (a.) sang ([(ə)θìɴ]) |
Template:My su tui. ([θù do̰]) |
Template:My sang tui. ([θìɴ]) |
- * The basic particle to indicate plurality is တို့ (tui.), colloquial ဒို့ (dui.).[16]
- ‡ Used by males.
- † Used by females.
Other pronouns are reserved for speaking with Buddhist monks. When speaking to a monk, pronouns like Template:My bhun: bhun: (from Template:My phun: kri:, "monk"), Template:My (chara dau [sʰəjàdɔ̀]; "royal teacher"), and Template:My (a.hrang bhu.ra:; [ʔəʃɪ̀ɴ pʰəjá]; "your lordship") are used depending on their status (Template:My); when referring to oneself, terms like Template:My (ta. pany. tau ; "royal disciple") or Template:My (da. ka [dəɡà], "donor") are used. When speaking to a monk, the following pronouns are used:
Person | Singular | |
---|---|---|
Informal | Formal | |
First person | Template:My† ta.pany. do |
Template:My† da. ka [dəɡà] |
Second person | Template:My bhun: bhun: ([pʰóʊɴ pʰóʊɴ]) Template:My (u:) pasang: ([(ú) bəzín]) |
Template:My a.hrang bhu.ra: ([ʔəʃɪ̀ɴ pʰəjá]) Template:My‡ chara dau ([sʰəjàdɔ̀]) |
- † The particle ma. (Template:My) is suffixed for females.
- ‡ Typically reserved for the chief monk of a monastery.
In colloquial Burmese, possessive pronouns are contracted when the root pronoun itself is low toned.[20] This does not occur in literary Burmese, which uses ၏ ([ḭ]) as postpositional marker for possessive case instead of Template:My ([jɛ̰]). Examples include the following:
- Template:My ([ŋà] "I") + Template:My (postpositional marker for possessive case) = Template:My ([ŋa̰] "my")
- Template:My ([nɪ̀ɴ] "you") + Template:My (postpositional marker for possessive case) = Template:My ([nɪ̰ɴ] "your")
- Template:My ([θù] "he, she") + Template:My (postpositional marker for possessive case) = Template:My ([θṵ] "his, her")
The contraction also occurs in some low toned nouns, making them possessive nouns (e.g. Template:My or Template:My, "mother's" and "Burma's" respectively).
Family terms
The most obvious difference between Upper Burmese and Lower Burmese is that Upper Burmese speech still differentiates maternal and paternal sides of a family:
Term | Upper Burmese | Lower Burmese | Myeik dialect |
---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|||
|
1 The youngest (paternal or maternal) aunt may be called Template:My [dwé lé], and the youngest paternal uncle Template:My [ba̰ dwé].
In a testament to the power of media, the Yangon-based speech is gaining currency even in Upper Burma. Upper Burmese-specific usage, while historically and technically accurate, is increasingly viewed as countrified speech, or at best regional speech. In fact, some usages are already considered strictly regional Upper Burmese speech, and are likely dying out. For example:
Term | Upper Burmese | Standard Burmese |
---|---|---|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
In general, the male-centric names of old Burmese for familial terms have been replaced in standard Burmese with formerly female-centric terms, which are now used by both sexes. One holdover is the use of Template:My (younger brother to a male) and Template:My (younger brother to a female). Terms like Template:My (elder brother to a male) and Template:My (younger sister to a male) now are used in standard Burmese only as part of compound words like Template:My (brothers) or Template:My (brother and sister).
Reduplication
Reduplication is prevalent in Burmese and is used to intensify or weaken adjectives' meanings. For example, Template:My ([tɕʰɔ́] "beautiful") is reduplicated, the intensity of the adjective's meaning increases. Many Burmese words, especially adjectives with two syllables, such as Template:My ([l̥a̰pa̰] "beautiful"), when reduplicated (Template:My → Template:My [l̥a̰l̥a̰ pa̰pa̰]) become adverbs. This is also true of some Burmese verbs and nouns (e.g. Template:My "a moment" → Template:My "frequently"), which become adverbs when reduplicated.
Some nouns are also reduplicated to indicate plurality. For instance, Template:My ([pjì] "country"), but when reduplicated to Template:My ([əpjì pjì] "country"), means "many countries," as in Template:My ([əpjì pjì sʰàɪɴ jà] "international"). Another example is Template:My, which means "a kind," but the reduplicated form Template:My means "multiple kinds."
A few measure words can also be reduplicated to indicate "one or the other":
- Template:My (measure word for people) → Template:My (someone)
- Template:My (measure word for things) → Template:My (something)
Romanization and transcription
There is no official romanization system for Burmese. There have been attempts to make one, but none have been successful. Replicating Burmese sounds in the Latin script is complicated. There is a Pāli-based transcription system in existence, MLC Transcription System, which was devised by the Myanmar Language Commission (MLC). However, it only transcribes sounds in formal Burmese and is based on the orthography rather than the phonology.
Several colloquial transcription systems have been proposed, but none is overwhelmingly preferred over others.
Transcription of Burmese is not standardized, as seen in the varying English transcriptions of Burmese names. For instance, a Burmese personal name like Template:My ([wɪ́ɴ]) may be variously romanized as Win, Winn, Wyn, or Wynn, while Template:My ([kʰàɪɴ]) may be romanized as Khaing, Khine, or Khain.
Computer input
The Burmese script can be entered from the standard QWERTY keyboard. The most popular Burmese font, Zawgyi, is not Unicode-compliant, though a number of Unicode-compliant fonts are available. Microsoft Windows 8 supports Burmese Unicode and supplies a font, Myanmar Text, that is Unicode-compliant.[24]
Notes
- ^ a b c d Hopple 2004, p. 160.
- ^ Htin Aung 1967, p. 32.
- ^ Moore 2007, p. 236.
- ^ Hall 1960, p. 11.
- ^ Lieberman 2003, p. 90. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFLieberman2003 (help)
- ^ Harvey 1925, p. 24-25. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFHarvey1925 (help)
- ^ a b c d Herbert & Milner 1989.
- ^ Khin Min 1987.
- ^ San San Hnin Tun 2012.
- ^ a b c UC 2012, p. 369.
- ^ Harvey 1925, p. 307. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFHarvey1925 (help)
- ^ Aung-Thwin 2005, p. 167–178, 197–200.
- ^ a b UC 2012, p. 368.
- ^ Lieberman 2003, p. 136. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFLieberman2003 (help)
- ^ Taw Sein Ko 1924, p. viii. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFTaw_Sein_Ko1924 (help)
- ^ a b Campbell 1998, p. 101.
- ^ a b c Wheatley 2013.
- ^ Okell 2009, p. 33, 38, 66, 165.
- ^ Okell 2009, p. 164.
- ^ a b Campbell 1998, p. 100.
- ^ From Burmese Template:My, lit. "lord master"
- ^ Bradley 1993, p. 157–160.
- ^ Bradley 1993.
- ^ "Myanmar Text - Version 1.00". Microsoft Typography. Microsoft. 2013. Retrieved 19 October 2013.
References
- Htin Aung, Maung (1967). A History of Burma. New York and London: Cambridge University Press.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Hall, D.G.E. (1960). Burma (3rd ed.). Hutchinson University Library. ISBN 978-1-4067-3503-1.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Harvey, G. E. (1925). History of Burma: From the Earliest Times to 10 March 1824. London: Frank Cass & Co. Ltd.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Lieberman, Victor B. (2003). Strange Parallels: Southeast Asia in Global Context, c. 800–1830, volume 1, Integration on the Mainland. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-80496-7.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Moore, Elizabeth H. (2007). Early Landscapes of Myanmar. Bangkok: River Books. ISBN 974-9863-31-3.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help)
- Julie D. Allen; et al., eds. (April 2012). "11. Southeast Asian Scripts". The Unicode Standard Version 6.1 – Core Specification (PDF). Mountain View, CA: The Unicode Consortium. pp. 368–373. ISBN 978-1-936213-02-3.
{{cite book}}
: Explicit use of et al. in:|editor=
(help) - Aung-Thwin, Michael (2005). The Mists of Rāmañña: The Legend that was Lower Burma (illustrated ed.). Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press. ISBN 978-0824828868.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Aung Bala (1981). "Contemporary Burmese literature". Contributions to Asian Studies. 16.
{{cite journal}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Barron, Sandy; Okell, John; Yin, Saw Myat; VanBik, Kenneth; Swain, Arthur; Larkin, Emma; Allott, Anna J.; Ewers, Kirsten (2007). Refugees from Burma: Their Backgrounds and Refugee Experiences (PDF) (Report). Center for Applied Linguistics. Retrieved 2010-08-20.
{{cite report}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Benedict, Paul K. (1948). "Tonal Systems in Southeast Asia". Journal of the American Oriental Society. 68 (4). American Oriental Society. doi:10.2307/595942. JSTOR 595942.
{{cite journal}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help); Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) - Bradley, David (Spring 1993). "Pronouns in Burmese–Lolo" (PDF). Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman area. 16 (1). Melbourne: La Trobe University.
{{cite journal}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Bradley, David (2006). Sociolinguistics / Soziolinguistik. Vol. 3. Walter de Gruyter. ISBN 9783110184181.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help); Unknown parameter|editors=
ignored (|editor=
suggested) (help) - Bradley, David (1996). Atlas of Languages of Intercultural Communication in the Pacific, Asia, and the Americas. Vol. 1. Walter de Gruyter. ISBN 9783110134179.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Bradley, David (1989). "Uncles and Aunts: Burmese Kinship and Gender" (PDF). South-east Asian Linguisitics: Essays in Honour of Eugénie J.A. Henderson. School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London: 147–162.
{{cite journal}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Bradley, David (2010). "9. Burma, Thailand, Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam". In Martin J. Ball (ed.). The Routledge Handbook of Sociolinguistics Around the World (PDF). Routledge. pp. 98–99. ISBN 978-0-415-42278-9.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Bradley, David (1995). "Reflexives in Burmese" (PDF). Papers in Southeast Asian Linguistics No. 13: studies in Burmese languages (A-83). Australian National University: 139–172.
{{cite journal}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Bradley, David (May 2011). "Changes in Burmese Phonology and Orthography". SEALS Conference. Kasetsart University. Retrieved 19 October 2013.
{{cite web}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Bradley, David (2012). "The Characteristics of the Burmic Family of Tibeto-Burman". Language and Linguistics. 13 (1): 171–192.
{{cite journal}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Chang, Charles Bond (2003). “High-Interest Loans”: The Phonology of English Loanword Adaptation in Burmese (B.A. thesis). Harvard University. Retrieved 2011-05-24.
{{cite thesis}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Chang, Charles B. (2009). "English loanword adaptation in Burmese" (PDF). Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society. 1: 77–94.
{{cite journal}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Harvey, G. E. (1925). History of Burma: From the Earliest Times to 10 March 1824. London: Frank Cass & Co. Ltd.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Herbert, Patricia M.; Milner, Anthony (1989). South-East Asia Languages and Literatures: A Select Guide. University of Hawaii Press. ISBN 978-0-8248-1267-6.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Hill, Nathan W. (2012). "Evolution of the Burmese Vowel System" (PDF). Transactions of the Philological Society. 110 (1): 64–79.
{{cite journal}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Hnin Tun; San San (2001). Burmese Phrasebook. Vicky Bowman. Lonely Planet. ISBN 9781740590488.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Houtman, Gustaaf (1990). Traditions of Buddhist Practice in Burma. Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Jones, Robert (1986). McCoy, John; Light, Timothy (eds.). Pitch register languages. E. J. Brill.
{{cite book}}
:|work=
ignored (help); Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Khin Min, Maung (1987). "Old Usage Styles of Myanmar Script". Myanmar Unicode & NLP Research Center. Retrieved 2008-07-29.
{{cite web}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Lieberman, Victor B. (2003). Strange Parallels: Southeast Asia in Global Context, c. 800–1830, volume 1, Integration on the Mainland. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-80496-7.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Nishi, Yoshio (30 October 1998). "The Development of Voicing Rules in Standard Burmese" (PDF). Bulletin of the National Museum of Ethnology. 23 (1). 国立民族学博物館: 253–260.
{{cite journal}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Nishi, Yoshio (31 March 1998). "The Orthographic Standardization of Burmese: Linguistic and Sociolinguistic Speculations" (PDF). Bulletin of the National Museum of Ethnology. 22. 国立民族学博物館: 975–999.
{{cite journal}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Okell, John (2002). Burmese By Ear or Essential Myanmar (PDF). London: The School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London. ISBN 1 86013 758.
{{cite book}}
: Check|isbn=
value: length (help); Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Myanmar–English Dictionary. Myanmar Language Commission. 1993. ISBN 1-881265-47-1 http://sealang.net/burmese.
{{cite encyclopedia}}
: Missing or empty|title=
(help) - Discourse Marking in Burmese and English: A Corpus-Based Approach (PDF) (Thesis). University of Nottingham. 2006.
- Taw Sein Ko (1924). Elementary Handbook of the Burmese Language. Rangoon: American Baptist Mission Press.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Taylor, L. F. (1920). "On the tones of certain languages of Burma". Bulletin of the School of Oriental Studies. 1 (4). Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/S0041977X00101685. JSTOR 607065.
{{cite journal}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Wheatley, Julian; Tun, San San Hnin (1999). "Languages in contact: The case of English and Burmese". The Journal of Burma Studies. 4.
{{cite journal}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Wheatley, Julian (2013). "12. Burmese". Sino-Tibetan Languages. Routledge. ISBN 9781135797171.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help); Unknown parameter|editors=
ignored (|editor=
suggested) (help) - Aung Zaw (September 2010). "Tell the World the Truth". The Irrawaddy. 18 (9). Chiang Mai.
{{cite journal}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Wheatley, Julian K. (1987). "Burmese". In B. Comrie (ed.) (ed.). Handbook of the world's major languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 834–54. ISBN 0-19-520521-9.
{{cite book}}
:|editor=
has generic name (help); Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Yanson, Rudolf A. (2012). Nathan Hill (ed.). Aspiration in the Burmese Phonological System: A Diachronic Account. Medieval Tibeto-Burman Languages IV. BRILL. pp. 17–29. ISBN 9789004232020.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - Yanson, Rudolf (1994). "3. Language". In Uta Gärtner, Jens Lorenz (ed.). Tradition and Modernity in Myanmar. LIT Verlag Münster. pp. 366–426. ISBN 9783825821869.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help); Missing or empty|title=
(help)
Further reading
- Becker, Alton L. (1984). "Biography of a sentence: A Burmese proverb". In E. M. Bruner (ed.) (ed.). Text, play, and story: The construction and reconstruction of self and society. Washington, D.C.: American Ethnological Society. pp. 135–55.
{{cite book}}
:|editor=
has generic name (help) - Bernot, Denise (1980). Le prédicat en birman parlé (in French). Paris: SELAF. ISBN 2-85297-072-4.
- Cornyn, William Stewart (1944). Outline of Burmese grammar. Baltimore: Linguistic Society of America.
- Cornyn, William Stewart (1968). Beginning Burmese. New Haven: Yale University Press.
{{cite book}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - Green, Antony D. (2005). "Word, foot, and syllable structure in Burmese". In J. Watkins (ed.) (ed.). Studies in Burmese linguistics. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics. pp. 1–25. ISBN 0-85883-559-2.
{{cite book}}
:|editor=
has generic name (help) - Okell, John (1969). A reference grammar of colloquial Burmese. London: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-7007-1136-8.
- Roop, D. Haigh (1972). An introduction to the Burmese writing system. New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN 0-300-01528-3.
- Taw Sein Ko (1924). Elementary handbook of the Burmese language. Rangoon: American Baptist Mission Press.
- Watkins, Justin W. (2001). "Illustrations of the IPA: Burmese". Journal of the International Phonetic Association. 31 (2): 291–95. doi:10.1017/S0025100301002122.
- Patricia M Herbert, Anthony Milner, ed. (1989). South East Asia Languages and Literatures: Languages and Literatures: A Select Guide. University of Hawaii Press. ISBN 0-8248-1267-0.