Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trishneet Arora (2nd nomination)

Trishneet Arora

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Comment The nominator account is a SPA. -- GreenC 17:10, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so KatyRat (talk) 14:08, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Recreation by a SPA Account. WP:CSD#G4 likely to apply. Repeated addition of advert content by ip, similar to the ones that disputed previous afd discussion. Sources listed have only mention of his name. Non-notable per WP:N and sources fails WP:SOURCE Only two sources that too local supplements aren't enough to determine notability KatyRat (talk) 16:14, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Significant coverage in multiple reliable sources per WP:GNG. -- GreenC 17:06, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No much improvement after previous afd discussion where it was deleted. Simply a recreation again. Moreover the Ip that recently voted as keep in this discussion is blatantly voting on multiple afd without any justification therefore I removed that vote. Please refer to old afd as well. KatyRat (talk) 16:40, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 01:02, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 01:02, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Needs improvement, remove promotional content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.166.137.167 (talk) 15:24, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This template must be substituted.

No clear justification. Sounds similar defending cause as previous afd. KatyRat (talk) 08:33, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: User:KatyRat, do not edit other's edits. I have restored the IP's comment. Btw, you yourself, through this account, have less than 10 edits on WP. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:29, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit is referred to striking off the above with a valid justification. If you think it's wrong, you can justify KatyRat (talk) 14:07, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The IP activity on this afd reminds the behaviour on its previous afd which was deleted post discussion. I would like other editors to have a look at the earlier afd and compare it with the ip. KatyRat (talk) 10:51, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note to Closing Admin : The article was recreated by a SPA

This account has been blocked indefinitely because CheckUser evidence confirms that the account's owner has abusively used multiple accounts.

(Account information: block log · CentralAuth · suspected sockpuppets · confirmed sockpuppets)

whose sole purpose is to edit and promote this article even without passing deletion review. Likely to be a sock. KatyRat (talk) 14:22, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment KatyRat, you can't delete and strike-out !votes and comments just because you don't like them. Stop interfering with the due process of the AfD. This is your second warning. If if continues I will ask for help from a moderator. -- GreenC 15:01, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have stated valid reasons for my actions above quite clearly. KatyRat (talk) 15:17, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ping @MBisanz:, @Sesamevoila:, @Carrite: , @Regentspark: , @Redtigerxyz: , @Tokyogirl79: , @Thompson.matthew: , @Nageh: , @Zananiri: -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by KatyRat (talk • contribs)

KatyRat chose to ping all who !voted Delete in the last AfD while excluding the majority who !voted Keep. This is a clear case of WP:CANVAS and puts the viability of this entire AfD in doubt. This is the third case of WP:Disruptive editing by KatyRat during this AfD so I will be asking a moderator to look at it. -- GreenC 12:54, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ANI request for help. -- GreenC 13:10, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There appear to be sufficient WP:RS to justify an article. It needs work and there's not a lot of information but a stub on him as an author is probably justified. SPACKlick (talk) 13:19, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep KatyRat motive is to delete this article, Article meet every requirement of WP. Article has well enough news coverage sources.

What you say, User:Green Cardamom ? User055 (talk) 13:19, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This template must be substituted.

Keep Followed up on the few sources mentioned . They were all relevant and from reliable media portals! The boy has acheived more than necessary to have a wikepedia page! Nothing seemed fraudulent in the profile ! The page should definately not be scrapped.SCMite (talk) 16:09, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This template must be substituted.

Comment I have reverted my edits that were disruptive (for which I humbly apologize) by Green.Cardamomto make it a healthy discussion. Thank You! KatyRat (talk) 18:17, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]