Jump to content

Talk:Ahmed Raza Khan Barelvi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Nkv (talk | contribs) at 17:46, 2 August 2006 (removing pointless statement). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

I am a moderator of the source page/Forum quoted in the Copyright violation notice, it was one of our Forum Founders who has authored this piece and another Founder member who had started this page on WikiPedia.

The material was not copyrighted by us. Please restore this page ! See http://www.sunniport.com/portal/viewtopic.php?p=300 for explicit notice on this material NOT being under any copyright.

Admin Team www.sunniport.com

Ok. That note at the top of the page: "Note : This content is free for distribution or republishing and is not under any copyright" is quite sufficient. I've removed the copyvio notice, and noted the point at Wikipedia:Copyright problems. Thanks so much for helping clear this up! And thanks esspecialy for contributing to Wikipedia, we really need better material on Islamic topics. 04:16, 19 August 2005 (UTC)


Are any of the following directly relevant to this article? They come from a highly dubious anonymous source (Wetman 21:10, 16 January 2006 (UTC)):[reply]

These links are all links to Barelvi institutes and organisations, which is the sect/movement that Ahmad Raza Khan (RA) founded. These perhaps aren't relevant to this article but would be to the barelvi article. Tanzeel 12:22, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Imam Raza Khan and Ahmad Raza

A-salaam-o-alaikum-Rahmen-ALLAH

Tonight, I found the Imam Raza Khan on the clean-up page and thought i would edit it. I have two new sources that you don't have (well you don't have any) I think it would be good to join the best that i have written and the whole of your site. It makes no sense to keep people going to a wrong site and being confused. join them together please brother. It serves no point to let them be seperate. Mike33 22:11, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]