Talk:Dilution ratio
Appearance
Contested deletion
This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because: the external website is dated "22nd March, 2011", a date prior to which the offending content already existed in Wikipedia ([1]), therefore the website copied WP. --Fgnievinski (talk) 05:26, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Contested deletion
This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement because the text originated in the Wikipedia article Ratio. The copyright violation is, in fact, the other way round. The answer given in 2011 was an exact copy of the Wikipedia section (but no attribution was given to Wikipedia). Dbfirs 06:12, 24 July 2015 (UTC)