User talk:NextGenSam619/Archive 1
July 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Philippe Coutinho has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Philippe Coutinho was changed by Sammanhumagain (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951976 on 2014-07-01T11:54:26+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:54, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User:Sammanhumagain
A tag has been placed on User:Sammanhumagain requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. JMHamo (talk) 16:53, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Jack Dunn (footballer)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Jack Dunn (footballer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wysprgr2005 (talk) 07:23, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
The article Yan Dhanda (footballer born 1998) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. GimliDotNet (Speak to me,Stuff I've done) 08:23, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Rafael Páez
The article Rafael Páez has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTBALL.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RRD13 (talk) 16:35, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Rafael Páez for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rafael Páez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rafael Páez until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. C679 11:41, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
--36.253.136.250 (talk) 08:00, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Match day live
What sport is this? What country is this? Postcard Cathy (talk)
It's not a sport. It's a television program for pre and post premier league matches. --Sammanhumagain (talk) 14:12, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Matchday Live
The article Matchday Live has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No evidence of notability
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 18:26, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Matchday Live for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matchday Live is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matchday Live until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GiantSnowman 09:19, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
December 2014
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Stephen Darby, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:42, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
I appreciate what you are saying and I did this after looking at Bradford City's wikipedia page and read that he is the captain so I made the addition. I was just adding the fact Mattythewhite but didn't have the source to support it. --Sammanhumagain (talk) 08:40, 8 December 2014 (UTC)Verified Nepal 07:23, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
AFDs
Hi Sammanhumagain,
When nominating articles for deletion please also give a reason as too why you think it should be deleted - Failure to so will see it being Speedy Kept,
I've closed this afd as Keep because there wasn't a reason - If you want it reopened let me know and I'll reopen although you would then obviously need to state why on that AFD, FYI It's been renominated here
Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 23:57, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
Hey, Davey2010Talk, I respect all the guidelines of Wikipedia and nominated the page for deletion because it fails WP:NFOOTBALL.--Sammanhumagain (talk) 03:47, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of List of Liverpool Captains
The article List of Liverpool Captains has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails WP:NOTSTATS, content fork is not required
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 01:19, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Hey, I have improved the article and made sure that it does not fail WP:NOTSTATS. Sammanhumagain (talk) 04:31, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of List of Liverpool Captains for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Liverpool Captains is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Liverpool Captains until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 12:51, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Liverpool F.C. Player of the Season for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Liverpool F.C. Player of the Season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liverpool F.C. Player of the Season until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 15:38, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Football Today
The article Football Today has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails WP:GNG, no evidence of notability
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 15:43, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Football Today for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Football Today is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Football Today until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 12:23, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Jordon Ibe
Hello. You probably don't realise that we may not add information of a personal nature, such as the nationality of Mr Ibe's parents, without adding a reference to a reliable source to verify that information. Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living persons is strict on this. How it's supposed to work is, you find the content in a reliable published source, and only then add the content and the source together. Adding content with a citation needed tag isn't acceptable. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 08:58, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
- And again, re this edit. Please stop adding content without adding a source. Struway2 (talk) 17:09, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
Welcome!
|
please don't add protection templates to unprotected pages
Hi - thanks for your RFPP request, but you shouldn't add tags like {{pp-dispute}} to unprotected pages. It's misleading. Non-admins cannot protect pages and it just creates more work for us when we have to go back and remove it. (There's a bot that does that kind of thing but it's not very fast.)Thanks. :-) KrakatoaKatie 14:33, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- For more information, take a look at WP:PP, WP:ADMIN, and WP:RFA. In short, we learned early in the project that if we allowed everyone to protect any page they wanted, this wouldn't be a wiki much longer. KrakatoaKatie 14:55, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Reference errors on 21 April
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the FA Cup Final referees page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited FA Cup Final referees, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jonathan Moss (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Referencing
Hi there, with regard to the content you recently submitted at List of Bollywood films of 2015, a note that the reference you provided, this, doesn't mention anything about a May 21st premiere. I've found another reference and added it to the article, but it would be appreciated if you'd please double check your references next time to be sure they support the content you are adding. Thanks and regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:34, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Liverpool POTY award
Hi, I saw you reverted my good faith edits - I assume the Player of the Season award given by former Liverpudlian players is something else than the Player of the Year prize awarded by "Liverpool F.C. itself"? This was not 100% clear at that moment. Regards, Kareldorado (talk) 05:03, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
"A page you started (2015 FIFA U-20 World Cup squads) has been reviewed!" Reply
I would love to complete the job, but I don't have all information I need. Some squads are released in their respectie languages and I'm not able to read most of them. I need help.--SirEdimon (talk) 01:31, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Rollback
Hi Sammanhumagain. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war.
- If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
- Use common sense.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Beeblebrox (talk) 16:24, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
@Beeblebrox Thank You!!! I will contact you on your talk page.Sammanhumagaint@lk 16:59, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
pending changes reviewer user right
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. KrakatoaKatie 00:56, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Regarding User name change
Hello, @User:KrakatoaKatie
I've almost been editing Wikipedia for about a year now. Initially I didn't know that generally Wikipedians don't go by their names as users. So I made my userpage with my real name. I am active on social media with that same name so someone may react negatively to me in social media regarding my contributions here. So my point is I want to change my userpage name and I don't know the process to do it. Additionally I have some sub pages in the userpage(please see my userpage) and I want to change the names in all those pages as well. Could you help me? I would also appreciate if you suggested me some names to replace the current one as I can't think of a one. Cheers!!!Sammanhumagaint@lk 05:43, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- WP:CHU is the place for you. Sorry, but suggesting usernames isn't something I do. :-) KrakatoaKatie 15:27, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
List of wifi router companies
Okay 2 things-first off its not a BLP so that does not apply-also for some reason it looks like it was not put correctly on the page or put on the talk page of the creator. But if you think it should be deleted do a normal prod or a afd. Wgolf (talk) 03:49, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
If I had to request for deletion I would do it but I don't see any problem for it to be deleted. But I want the page to have a lead and at least one proper citation which I hope you can provide. Once again I want the article to be expanded rather than being deleted. Cheers!!! Sammanhumagaint@lk 03:52, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
- Not sure what it would be-but you don't put up a BLP prod for that though as that is for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 03:54, 6 June 2015 (UTC)