Jump to content

User talk:Yunshui/Archive 47

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< User talk:Yunshui

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 03:30, 13 August 2015 (Archiving 4 discussion(s) from User talk:Yunshui) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Archive 40←Archive 45Archive 46Archive 47Archive 48Archive 49Archive 50

YGM

You've got mail. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 11:36, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

SPI

Any chance you could take a look at this again: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sherlock4000? Its all gotten very interesting with a new user admitting a COI and pushing the exact same edits that the previously found socks were making. This new user also was created just after the initial blocks. I believe this is sufficient evidence to suspect this new user is the same as the old. DaltonCastle (talk) 23:46, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

I've added CU results to the case page - it's a confirmed sock of a group that is suspected, but not technically confirmed, as Sherlock4000. Yunshui 雲水 08:14, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Recreation and Unsalt of Draft:Shekhar Chatterjee

I am referring to an earlier article that was deleted post AFD Discussion 5 months back. I was blocked for disruptive editing (non-intentionally and I also apologized for the same) and hence I opened a new account BlueBuzz to restart in a new way but I was blocked again as self-admitted sock. When trying to create the article in a more better way in draft space with many new sources that have come up post AFD Discussion, I found myself unable to create the Draft for the article in Draft Space. I would request you to unsalt the draft space at the least so that I can create the article and when it's suitable it can be moved to main space on meeting all policies and guidelines of Wikipedia and I also promise to contribute to this community in the best possible way. I am already addicted to this community so can't help it. SanjoyChatterjee1 (talk) 17:25, 26 July 2015 (UTC) [1] [2] [3]

References

  1. ^ "'Never lose your passion and hope', says 15 year old Indian IT genius!". Retrieved 26 July 2015.
  2. ^ "Udaipur Youth to Business Forum by AIESEC Udaipur concludes". Retrieved 26 July 2015.
  3. ^ "Pre-event of Youth to Business Forum by AIESEC". Retrieved 26 July 2015.


Sir, I have read policies WP:N, WP:BLP, WP:RSN, WP:COI, WP:NPOV. Do I need to study anything more to get an appropriate grip over wikipedia policies? Your reply will be highly solicited. Thanks SanjoyChatterjee1 (talk) 04:30, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
So given that your original block is still active, and that the last time you tried to evade the block by creating a new account it was blocked, what made you think this time would be any different? Blocked as a self-confessed sock of User:Sanjoy64. Until you convince an administrator to lift the block on your original account (which has just been made more unlikely thanks to this latest piece of block evasion), you, the person at the keyboard, are not allowed to edit Wikipedia. Yunshui 雲水 08:06, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
I am trying my best to convince you guys at my best. I don't know why you guys are not willing to give me atleast one chance. My other accounts have contributed to Wikipedia in a very positive way. I do not work on disrupting this project. If I am given a change I will surely be a very good contributor and editor. Vadodara Bus Station is the one I created. 203.88.159.5 (talk) 09:22, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
All you are convincing us of at the moment is that you are willing to engage in sockpuppetry and block evasion to try and reinsert a legitimately deleted article with which you have a conflict of interest. Since your talkpage access is also revoked, you currently have two routes of appeal; UTRS and BASC. As a member of both those groups, I can safely tell you that any appeal will currently be looked on unfavourably due to your repeated violations of the multiple accounts policy to evade your block. The Standard Offer is likely to be the only avenue open to you at this point. Yunshui 雲水 09:27, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

I would hereby accept WP:OFFER and abide it's terms. You don't need to block this ip repeatedly because I am not editing anymore. 203.88.159.63 (talk) 11:57, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

I guess we'll see you in six months, then. Note that the six month time limit resets from your last edit to Wikipedia (currently the message above) - if you edit again, via an IP or an account, the clock goes back to zero. Yunshui 雲水 12:02, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Wow, you're really not getting this, are you? Apparently it will be necessary to block your new IP address. Yunshui 雲水 12:32, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Parramatta Eels

Hi Yunshui. I saw that you hid two recent edits made to Parramatta Eels by 203.160.9.73 because they were "purely disruptive". Can you take a look at [1] and [2] and decide if they should be hidden as well. The second of the two is obviously derogatory while the first one seems to be a snarky attempt to insert "information" about this woman into the article. Since the two accounts were created yesterday seemingly just to keep trying to add information about this woman to the article, they might be connected to 203.160.9.73 per WP:DUCK. - Marchjuly (talk) 01:34, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Yes indeed they should. I've also slapped a silverlock on the page for a bit, and blocked the account. Cheers for flagging that. Yunshui 雲水 08:06, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for taking another look. - Marchjuly (talk) 22:04, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Yunshui/Archive_47&oldid=675855071"