User talk:Rsrikanth05

Please leave new messages at the bottom of the page ONLY. If it is a new topic, please create a new section.

Today's articles for improvement

• Hello Rsrikanth05:

This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaboration has begun at Week 20 of 2015. Thanks for participating!

Sent by User:Northamerica1000 using mass messaging

Speaking of constructive.....

Thanks. So I had actually made a more constructive edit earlier, supported by trusted sources, I might add (e.g.: ABC and also CBS news). But this earlier version of the comment was almost immediately changed....apparently by someone who had pretty strong feelings about the whole thing. So, I made the one you saw, which was a bit cheeky. So speaking of constructive, Rsrikanth05...can you advise me on how should I make an alternative point, if every way (constructive or otherwise) gets changed within a couple hours? This is actually the first time I edited in wikipedia, so I don't know.  :-S --76.22.72.61

??????

Why did you revert my relevant edits to Shit (disambiguation)? D638 (talk) 18:26, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

None of them were relevant. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 18:41, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

The relevance is that all of articles I added contained "shit" or a close variation in their titles. This is precisely the sort of material that should be included in a disambiguation page for "shit". D638 (talk) 18:46, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Just because they have shit in the title, it doesn't mean they are relevant. It would be relevant if they closely resembling the word shit, otherwise you can go on adding Crow Shit, Human Shit, Pig Shit and so on. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:35, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Education noticeboard

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Education noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

La Flaca and Urban Dictionary as a source

Why did you write Urban Dictionary isn't a reliable source? Just like Wikipedia, it is user generated, plus users can vote, up or down, for the definition of a term. Not only is it more democratic than a dictionary, it's also judged by users, unlike Wikipedia. Also, it is the only real source available for common usage and slang. In any case, if Urban Dictionary isn't accepted as a source, Wikipedia itself should never be accepted as a source, which would be a mistake.

Mcboozerilla

Wikipedia is NOT the same as UrbanDictionary. Unlike UD, everything on Wikipedia NEEDS A RELIABLE SOURCE. This is the fundamental differenece between the two and this is why UD can NEVER BE A RELIABLE source. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:33, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 33, 2015)

Berries for sale at a farmers' market Hello, Rsrikanth05. The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Berry Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Farmhouse • Igloo Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:27, 10 August 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI •

Please comment on Talk:Guy Fawkes Night

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Guy Fawkes Night. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
19		Kalwa, Thane (talk)						Add sources
1,988		Liv and Maddie (talk)						Add sources
52		700 (number) (talk)						Add sources
119		Thane district (talk)						Add sources
62		Kandivali (talk)						Add sources
317		Thane (talk)						Add sources
60		Ambarnath (talk)						Cleanup
152		Keir Hardie (talk)						Cleanup
55		Bhandup (talk)						Cleanup
8		Oshiwara River (talk)						Expand
18		Airbus Space and Defence SpacePlane (talk)						Expand
852		Manipur (talk)						Expand
76		Goregaon (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
38		Tarapur, Maharashtra (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
816		Cyborg (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
88		Malad (talk)						Merge
23		Implementation of bus rapid transit by country (talk)						Merge
16		Bonnie Prudden (talk)						Merge
161		SixthSense (talk)						Wikify
1		Sainagar (talk)						Wikify
82		Sanctuary of Our Lady of Lourdes (talk)						Wikify
11		Vivimed Labs (talk)						Orphan
10		Timeline of North American automobiles (talk)						Orphan
43		Valuelabs (talk)						Orphan
4		Asalfa (talk)						Stub
8		Laura Ries (talk)						Stub
1,038		Ryan McCartan (talk)						Stub
7		Schwendau (talk)						Stub
19		Scott Bloom (talk)						Stub
4		Versova metro station (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:33, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

August 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Shit (disambiguation). Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 04:08, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

How is it edit warring when other editors have reverted the same edit? --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 12:43, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

And welcome to Wikipedia indeed. After being here for 10 years. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 12:45, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation. Legobot (talk) 00:08, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Rubin Carter

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Rubin Carter. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Please stop with your unreasoned edits to Hume

That's all. Think about what you're doing and take the time to read the page before making edits that make no sense. "Highly influential" needed a deletion in the opening sentence? Thwre is a whole section on influence. Wikipedia policies are not an excuse to not use your brain when editing. Thanks. Kingshowman (talk) 16:11, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Unreasoned? I gave you a reason and you're violating the Reliable Sources guideline by using a typepad blog. Also, I'd suggest you learn to be civil. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 17:36, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

@Kingshowman: Also, using an edit summary like This is another editor with no interest in the topic and no reading comprehension skills who has destroyed work without any justification. is totally unwarranted, uncalled for, and liable to get you blocked. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 17:37, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Olympic Games

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Olympic Games. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 August 2015

• News and notes: Superprotect, one year later; a contentious RfA

• In the media: Paid editing; traffic drop; Nicki Minaj

• Forum: Community voices on paid editing

• Wikimanía report: Wikimanía 2015, part 2, a community event

• Traffic report: Fighting from top to bottom

• Featured content: Fused lizards, giant mice, and Scottish demons

• Technology report: Tech news in brief

• Blog: The Hunt for Tirpitz

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:10, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Deluge (software)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Deluge (software). Legobot (talk) 00:04, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Help

Thank alot for telling about the Chennai article I got confused about official names and common names

I have question for you I have seen wiki page of Bijapur,Karnataka it contains duplication of information about tourist attractions and separate section with again duplication of information. I don't know how admins have missed it. Interested because this happens to be place of living

Is it okay to edit or Remove duplicated information.

Prrash1985 (talk) 05:31, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

@Prrash1985: Do discuss it on the talk page (Talk:Bijapur). --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 06:18, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:LGBT rights opposition

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:LGBT rights opposition. Legobot (talk) 00:07, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Making Misuse Of Your Seniority on Wikipedia:

whatever edit I have done I have given reference to it i.e I have proved it. I will not edit the way you like it you are not owner of wikipedia that If you dont like it you will block me.