Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GhiathArodaki

GhiathArodaki

GhiathArodaki (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: suspected

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GhiathArodaki/Archive.

23 August 2015

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets

Partisanen123 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Editor interaction utility

this editor behavior resembles the behavior of GhiathArodaki,they edit-war and use disrespectful language and used to edit in the same article of the flag of syria,the most important evidence is both editor are vivid supporters of the SSNP,https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User:GhiathArodaki&oldid=546519250 For GhiathArodaki and https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Flag_of_Syria&diff=next&oldid=675960247 For Partisanen123 Alhanuty (talk) 16:52, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Far too early to make a determination at this point, IMHO. There's too little evidence to go on. —Psychonaut (talk) 16:54, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- they are the same,they share the same methods and same ideology,i recommend an SPI.Alhanuty (talk) 16:57, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- is it a coincidence that both edit war and begin editing at the same article.Alhanuty (talk) 16:59, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - With only two edits? Yes, it very well may be a coincidence. —Psychonaut (talk) 17:07, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
i recommend an SPI to make sure,if they are related or not,isn't very strange that both are supporters of SSNP.Alhanuty (talk) 17:10, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- It's not particularly strange that an SSNP supporter would be editing the Flag of Syria page, and GhiathArodaki was far from the only Syrian nationalist on Wikipedia. —Psychonaut (talk) 17:17, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am very familiar with Giath,its literally the same behavior.Alhanuty (talk) 17:22, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am familiar with GhiathArodaki primarily on Commons. The style of speaking is definitely similar, but there's not enough for me to say with certainty it is GhiathArodaki. If an SPI is not endorsed at this point I do suggest this new user be watched very closely. Fry1989 ^eh? 18:01, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

for that reason,i recommend an SPI,also additional evidence is that Giath has been active lately.Alhanuty (talk) 18:21, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Closing this case for the lack of evidence. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:39, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]