Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marvin Gladrow

Marvin Gladrow

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recreation of an article previously deleted by PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. This remains valid. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:11, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:11, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NFOOTY. Note: Some web sources show him as being signed to FC Energie Cottbus, a fully-professional-league team. But soccerway.com, which is already on the article page, clarifies that he had "0 appearances" and "0 minutes played" for that team. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 01:43, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Notability is not established. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 10:45, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 17:21, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no professional appearances Spiderone 17:25, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:05, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:05, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:05, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails both WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. MYS 77 ^✉ 19:47, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Redirect to SV Babelsberg 03 Any coverage that appears in a WP:BEFORE search appears to be routine coverage of matches and does not discuss the subject in depth. Mkdw ^talk 04:11, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Given how clear the consensus is, an admin should be able to come in and quickly resolve this. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 10:00, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I would endorse WP:SNOW as well, but unlike, say, a borderline-BLP-issue or suspected-copyvio page, there is no hurry, so I won't complain if an admin waits the full 7*24 hours, 0 minutes, and 0 seconds before closing this. However, unless something changes soon, he shouldn't wait much longer. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 18:20, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]