Jump to content

Talk:Sacco & Vanzetti (1971 film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jenks24 (talk | contribs) at 07:03, 8 September 2015 (Jenks24 moved page Talk:Sacco e Vanzetti to Talk:Sacco e Vanzetti (1971 film): per requested move discussion; see talk). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconFilm: Italian Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Italian cinema task force.
WikiProject iconItaly Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPhilosophy Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 23 August 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved to Sacco e Vanzetti (1971 film), '06 film moved to Sacco and Vanzetti (2006 film). Jenks24 (talk) 07:02, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]



– I was going to propose "Sacco and Vanzetti (documentary film)" for the 2006 film, but I guess consistency by year is more suitable. (EDIT: I found out many official English sources use ampersand for the 1971 film.) See below. George Ho (talk) 00:39, 23 August 2015 (UTC) Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 13:14, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support both for the English wiki.--Froglich (talk) 06:48, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Froglich: I can be wrong about usage on the 1971 film. --George Ho (talk) 17:03, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Pincrete: How about Sacco e Vanzetti (1971 film) ([1][2][3][4]) or Sacco and Vanzetti (1971 film) ([5]? Sources use both per source: [6][7][8] Since usage is divided per WP:UE, you can pick whatever feels most comfortable to you. George Ho (talk) 17:00, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support either 'e' or 'and' … it is hard to see which is most used for the film (many of these examples are talking about the case). My feeling was that no one was going to type '&' in a search box. I don't know what policy is about the use of '&' in titles. Pincrete (talk) 17:19, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not a policy but a guideline: WP:& says that '&' can be used in article titles and proper nouns but must be normally avoided elsewhere. George Ho (talk) 17:24, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.