Sparse inline citations, and many of the ones that are there aren't high quality.
The Table of Contents is huge.
Get more critical analysis of her work (look up reviews in Rolling Stone, Entertainment Weekly, newspapers of large cities, etc.).
(merged into bio)Personal section is light on real substance
(merged into bio)"Career achievments" is light on real substance.
Fill in 2 citations
Format the 2 added in link links into citations
Some pictures have network logos in them and the logos should be cropped out or another picture should be found as this is copyright infrigment
a cover picture of Rolling Stone in April 1999 is discussed, yet the cover is not pictured in the article.
It is mainly structural and syntactical issues like this that which separate it from FA status - there are plenty of facts but they are poorly presented and organised.
The See also list is also shockingly biased - essentially a list of lists which make Spears look good. I wonder if I should add List of people with the shortest marriages to balance it out!
the article also has a very messy supporting article base, many needing serious cleanup.
I'd suggest to do a lot of paragraph merging - keep them nice and long.
I'd suggest getting rid of the subsections of "personal" and merging everything to get more prose.
