Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kring's Law
Appearance
Supposedly "a mainstay of Internet culture". Google tells us it has been used 21 times in only one forum, lavag.org. Fails WP:NEO. -- Fan-1967 03:20, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. When it becomes as notable as Godwin's Law, it's a valid inclusion. BigHaz 03:24, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. VoiceOfReason 03:25, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. This should be filed under WP:NFT.--Fuhghettaboutit 04:06, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete — 8 hits by google appears to be user spam about NN topic Betacommand 05:10, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. NN. --Bigtop 05:10, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Law passed to hereby delete this article. -- Gogo Dodo 05:23, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Vanity page. Admin should also nuke Image:JKring.jpg which is only used in that page. Dgies 07:44, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - although the barefaced cheek of calling it a 'mainstay of internet culture' made me smile.--Nydas 10:23, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, non-notable 'theory'.--TheM62Manchester 11:22, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, non-notable neologism. It's hardly a "mainstay of Internet culture" if it's only been used on one forum. JIP | Talk 18:06, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Probably significantly less notable than Geogre's Law. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 22:15, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as vanity page. --DarkAudit 01:40, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as vanity page... a "mainstay" in 6 months or less indeed... --Svartalf 02:30, 7 August 2006 (UTC)