Jump to content

User talk:SwisterTwister

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Beecee14 (talk | contribs) at 02:32, 12 October 2015 (→Liam Payne Draft). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

≥Please sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~) and please be as specific as possible. Generally, I will reply here so please watch this page for a response.

New users: If you want to learn the basics of Wikipedia, my page for new users here contains useful information. Information such as citing sources, submitting images and changing & deleting username. If that page hasn't answered your question(s), contact me here.

Talk page watchers are welcome to answer if I am unavailable at the time.

Wikipedia ad for Wikipedia:Why create an account?
Wikipedia adsfile info – show another – #294

Delete call on Agoda.com AFD discussion

Hi there. I don't understand your call to delete the Agoda.com page. The reasons you stated on the AFD discussion are not aligned with the reasons for deletion according to Wikipedia:Deletion policy. Could you kindly elaborate further? Agoda.com is a household name in Southeast Asia, used by tens of thousands of people every day. Such a service warrants an encyclopedic entry. Please feel free to discuss the points I had stated on the AFD discussion. Thank you! Asheshong (talk) 03:28, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Add AdF to WikiProject Classical music

Hi there. Could you please help me to add Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Jackson (conductor) (2nd nomination) to WikiProject Classical music? Thank you!--Karljoos (talk) 14:19, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nucleus page Nomination

Hello SwisterTwister I dont understand on what basis u have added a deletion nomination to the page Nucleus Premium Properties Private ltd. Nucleus is a very famous builder in South India and has got lot of newslinks associated with them and prominent name in Construction Industry . May i know what are the flaws in the page .

Thanks . Hello SwisterTwister I am confused as to why my submission Mike Stanley Filmmaker was declined. You note that it should have news and magazine coverage. This article does have news and magazine coverage. There was reference made to a Fox 2 News interview and a Best Picture show interview. As for magazine coverage there is mention of three magazines in references, Cinemagic, Fangoria and B's Nest. B's Nest contains an interview with Mr. Stanley. These were all obtained from an archive page which also contains news articles on Mr. Stanley for a span of a period of nine years at: http://filmlabshowcase.wix.com/filmlab#!news-articles/c14xp I have also included more recent web posts on Mr. Stanley. His career spans 30 years. I believe there is more than enough to show he is notable. Thank you. Indiefanatic Indiefanatic (talk) 18:52, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indiefanatic Yes but it will need better coverage (to at least satisfy WP:GNG) as I mentioned at the draft page. SwisterTwister talk 19:31, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SwisterTwister

Edit Law Society of Ireland page

Hi again. Sorry to bother you but you mentioned on 10th December that you might be able to help to improve the Law Society of Ireland page? If you are semi-retired would you still have the time or would you prefer to recommend another editor? Thanks. FriendlyuserCP (talk) 17:36, 10 January 2014 (UTC))[reply]

Yes, I'm sorry but I don't think I'll be able to help you as I lost interest in the Law Society of Ireland. May I suggest asking someone with more expertise on this subject at Wikipedia:WikiProject Ireland? Cheers! SwisterTwister talk 04:32, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AfD - London Real TV

Not sure why there's an AfD happening on the article I've just made. Considering it's my first article in Wikipidea, would you help me navigate me through this and lessen the chances it would be deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theamotimes (talk • contribs) 19:56, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Responded at deletion nomination. SwisterTwister talk 04:32, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Clara Amfo

Hello SwisterTwister. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Clara Amfo".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Clara Amfo}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Bearian (talk) 21:29, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chuck Loeb, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hitch, The Untouchables and Jim Hall (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Arthur Hammerstein, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear SwisterTwister, I would like to let you know that the business bodies give awards to the company not to the person. Thats why same I wrote in the write-up.please guide.--Zainkazmi1 (talk) 19:46, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Icehockeyinharlem concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Icehockeyinharlem, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Icehockeyinharlem

Hello SwisterTwister. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Icehockeyinharlem".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Icehockeyinharlem}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SwisterTwister. You recently tagged a page that I have been trying to create as potentially self-promoting. It was the page David Rubenstein (attorney). If you don't mind, could you give me a few suggestions on how to make this article less subject to deletion? I am new to wikipedia, so I am unsure of exactly how many sources/what tone of language I need to be using to avoid these issues. Thank you in advance for your help. Theharrybell (talk) 17:00, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! I have a page for newcomers here that has some useful information as well as other pages Wikipedia:New contributors' help page. If you're sure you can rewrite the article, you can ask the deleting admin, User:RHaworth, to restore it. Cheers! SwisterTwister talk 03:50, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Webster quote

You mention the following quote: Wisdom begins at the end - Daniel Webster. Where and when did he say it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nelson4P (talk • contribs) 21:32, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I don't know about when but you can find it anywhere such as Google Books but I particularly found it at BrainyQuote.com. SwisterTwister talk 03:15, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding speedy deletion nomination on 1oth September:

Hello SwisterTwister, This is Maruf. I just got a notification for speedy deletion for some reason. I am entirely a new user and is not understanding the cause of this alert. I have already read the general criteria for speedy deletion and spam but it is still not clear to me which words, links or point I need to delete. I had no intention of ambiguous promotion of my company. I am just putting my company's info in Wikipedia and want to be listed by it. If you please see my writing again, be more precise about my faults and suggest me what should I change, it would be so kind of you.

I look forward to your quick reply.

Thanks! Maruf A. (talk) 06:11, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AFCH script

As you're using the old version of the AFCH script, please take a look at this discussion and the question (poll) raised below it.

Reference: Draft:Nyrius‎; 2014-09-12 22:30:03 . . (+161)‎ . . ‎SwisterTwister (Talk | contribs)‎ (Commenting on Wikipedia:Articles for creation submission (AFCH))

--Gryllida (talk) 11:04, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding speedy deletion nomination for JAFRA Cosmetics

Hello SwisterTwister, I'm new to Wikipedia and would like a chance to rewrite my article about JAFRA Cosmetics. I did not mean to create the article as promotional material and was only hoping to create a Wikipedia entry for the company. I have revised my references and edited the text to conform to the NPOV. Please let me know if it's possible to restore the page. Thanks! - Eternalstyle (talk) 18:56, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to recreate the article, you'll need to show it's notable meaning it has received significant third-party coverage from newspapers and magazines that talk about the company in-depth. Also, details such as the mission statement, usage of "we", "our" and "us" may be appropriate on the company's own website but not here as that sounds promotional and suggests ownership. Rather than adding it yourself, consider using Wikipedia:Articles for creation where a user such as myself can review it beforehand. Cheers! SwisterTwister talk 04:48, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday SwisterTwister

Hey, SwisterTwister. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Birthday from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day! Vatsan34 (talk) 16:51, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Back in September

You asked me about the removal of some material you added to Tajja Isen. In general I don't really like too much family background here except for figures of historical importance, but the exception is when it's relevant, but the musical family background of a musician is relevant. I'm not sure the no. of siblings etc. But the amount you had there is usually within the amount that is always OK. DGG ( talk ) 18:47, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!!!


E-e-bayer_lover (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

And remember to keep the CHRIST in CHRISTmas! E-e-bayer_lover (talk) 22:36, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re Edith Hirsch

Hi--yes, I believe notability is shown. An obituary in the NY Times, like one of my main sources, has been shown in a few AfDs to be a pretty good indicator of notability. Also, the multiple mentions in RS newspapers count, I think. But thanks for getting back to me so quickly! Origamiteⓣⓒ 05:44, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NPEOPLE: Multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability, which I did somewhat in the "Published" section. However, if you don't think that's right, it's my first article, which is why I put it up at AfC, even after 3,000 edits. Origamiteⓣⓒ 05:47, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I highly agree but I don't see much of a solid article with that information. If she had participated in a highly reported incident or other news-worthy event or won any notable awards, that would be something different. Cheers! SwisterTwister talk 05:55, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IVANCARDOSO (talk) 12:05, 29 March 2015 (UTC)Hello SwisterTwister, thanks for your time. I didn´t understand the last part of the message you left me after the revision of the page I´ve created callled The Berimbot. The part I didn´t understand is - this article would be better mentioned under the lab's article or something else relevant. What do you mean by that? This is my first article and everything here is new to me. Thanks a lot.[reply]

Request on 16:47:43, 29 March 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by 137aes


I guess I'm confused regarding my references. The references listed are reputable in the virtual reality world, just like Road & Track would be for cars. I agree that the article could be longer. As far as the significance of the Infinadeck, I assume you may not be familiar with locomotion in the virtual world. There are two products currently out there, e.g. the Virtuix Omni, but none are mechanical. That is what makes the Infinadeck notable. Any direction would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.

137aes (talk) 16:47, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IVANCARDOSO (talk) 06:40, 31 March 2015 (UTC)Dear SwisterTwister, please check https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haile_(robot)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/League_of_Electronic_Musical_Urban_Robots

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kismet_(robot)

IVANCARDOSO (talk) 13:20, 31 March 2015 (UTC)Dear SwisterTwister researching the Wikipedia, I found a category called Artistic and performing robots, some of them are: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haile_(robot)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/League_of_Electronic_Musical_Urban_Robots

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kismet_(robot)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_Cuco_El_Guapo

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karakuri_puppet

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titan_the_Robot

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyota_Partner_Robot

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Trons

I sent some of those links before, but the list now is more complete. There are many robots with a profile very similar or equal to the Berimbot, could you please advise what specific informations should I collect to improve the notability of my project? This is my first profile and everything is new to me. I thank you in advance.

Regarding New Article "Yasmina" by Yasmina Fan

Hello Swister twister,thanks for reviewing my article. I reviewed Criteria for Musicians Notability on this link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(music) Parts which I think are enough for Notability. -point number 4 in Notability was "Has received non-trivial coverage in independent reliable sources of an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one sovereign country". I have added references that mentioned Yasmina's participation in many national concerts in Egypt. -point number 6 was " is a musician who has been a reasonably prominent member of two or more independently notable ensembles " I have added references that mentioned Yasmina has been a member of 2 known Ensembles in Egypt.-point number 8 is "Has won or been nominated for a major music award" Yasmina received a music award from Egyptian Minister of Culture,is this prize not major enough? -point number 9 was "Has won or placed in a major music competition." Yasmina has participated in Arabs got talent Competition , while this competition is not only for musicians , its probably the biggest "Got Talent" spin off as it includes participants from 22 countries , and Yasmina was the only singer or musician to reach the final , effectively beating all others including Nadia Azzi who already has a wikipedia page. -point number 10 was "Has performed music for a work of media that is notable, e.g., a theme for a network television show, performance in a television show" I put link to her performances in 2 TV shows (She performed 3 songs in each show). Please give me feedback are all these points not enough for Notability ? Thanks.

Thanks for your time Link for edited article draft : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Yasmina —

Request on 16:34:59, 4 April 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Rtwhite


Thanks for your comments.

As far as I can see Friday Brown does meets the music 'notability' requirements of Wikipedia by winning international singing competitions and her television work: I’ve also indicated the period over which she was active. I used the phrase 'Friday Brown is' because she's still alive, rather than active. I suppose saying 'popular music singer-songwriter' could be confusing, but that was the arena in which she worked, popular music. It wasn’t intended to indicate her degree of popularity.

Any advice would be much appreciated.

Many thanks,

Ray.Rtwhite (talk) 16:34, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rtwhite (talk) 16:34, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SwisterTwister,

I am trying to figure out why this would be marked for deletion. In all things new such as the speed for technology today we will see changes in traditional concepts and new ones evolving.

The internet-of-things will impact and change business models and one of the most important going forward will be protecting digital data assets. Traditional recordkeeping and library, archive methodologies for 'preservation' do not cater and will not be suitable for digital data asset management. Whilst the concept and term of digital perpetuation is only just evolving one could same the same for a lot of new terms. Why is it that you have such a problem with this word and its objective for differentiation and clarification.

Even if you delete this the term will not go away. It is already out there in publication on professional website libraries and will be available in the Queensland archives shortly. Therefore whilst it is not prominent now like all new evolutions so is there the introduction to new terms of reference it takes time and one would had thought that the wikipedia was a progressive environment and keen to be seen to staying in touch technology and the changing global environment.

Thank you for your time. Linda Shave — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.173.192.215 (talk) 07:38, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding deletion of Al Wathba

Hello, How are you ? First of all thanku for reviewing my 1st wiki post.

You nominated my post to be deleted as there is some "lawsuit" filed against it. I reviewed the article and i couldn't able to find anything against al wathba. I have copied Conclusion of the post for the reference "This case is an example of the difficulties that can arise in the absence of clear drafting. while courts are always keen to give effect to the intentions of the parties to a freely negotiated contract, this is only possible where those intentions are made plain. Those clauses that are commonly considered ‘boilerplate’ (such as the ‘law and jurisdiction’ clause), are of essential importance when disputes arise and inserting plain, unambiguous wording must not be overlooked at the drafting stage."[1]

The Egyptian ship owner want to seek the justice outside the UAE law & order and It is clearly stated in all insurance documents that all the law and order are subjected to UAE court only.

And this article is helping the user that everybody should read and agree all the terms and conditions before going for any insurance.

This type of small court case for such a big insurance company is not a big issues.

Please review the article and advise me corrections so that newbies like me will also become contributor to wiki.

Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iloveabudhabi (talk • contribs) 12:03, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=86dea4d9-a192-4706-b5a2-bc6c4ca57c68

REQUEST FOR RE-REVIEW

Hello SwisterTwister. I'm respectfully requesting that you have another look at your vote:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Goldsboro_Web_Development

Being as I have provided independent, accredited university citations stating our software was the best available. Under Wikipedia guidelines this is noteworthy citation.

Leewells2000 (talk) 14:20, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

G11 AfCs

I altogether agree with what you are doing in tagging these afcs as G11, instead of starting a hopeless reviewing process--I think that's the way to handle it, andwish more people would do it the way you are. DGG ( talk ) 02:41, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

20:04:08, 30 May 2015 review of submission by 2602:30A:C0F6:2280:E45E:DC0B:C5DF:2F9A


Hello, I am one of Mr. Lantz's professors from Ghidotti Early College High School and I was wondering what your best advice would be on where to look for more notable sources. Mr. Lantz is graduating high school this year and I thought it was so rare for someone of his age, being only 17, to receive not just one college degree but two before finishing high school. Not to mention the fact he has 75 college credits completed already. I understand notability is of huge importance to Wikipedia, so if this continues to be a concern for him having his own article, would there be any chance he could merge into another page, like that of Dual enrollment. After all the volunteer work and service he has done for the school, we all wanted to give something back to him before he heads off to college, and he had always dreamed of having a Wikipedia article of his own. Thank you so much for your time and feedback. It is greatly appreciated.

2602:30A:C0F6:2280:E45E:DC0B:C5DF:2F9A (talk) 20:04, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, aside from starring in one documentary and receiving two diplomas before high school (I'm not sure if anyone has else accomplished this) there's not much notability and the article could seem promotional because of that. News coverage is always good and if it's in-depth that's even better. He could be mentioned at another article if it's outstanding such as if he is the only one to ever receive diplomas before high school. If there was an article for the documentary, he could be mentioned there but I'm not sure how significant his role in that was. If not, I'm afraid there's nothing to suggest mentioning him. Considering his young age, this also affects the low amount of good sources. Cheers! SwisterTwister talk 23:07, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

shimlahills page removal

Hi there,

i would like to know why you have highlighted my page as for deletion

Please guide what to do

i even can see other company page in wiki

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TaxiForSure see this one — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shimlahills (talk • contribs) 06:58, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

05:22:41, 6 June 2015 review of submission by 2602:304:68C7:78B0:F136:3C99:4981:8737


I am not certain why the amount of sources or their notability is an issue in the article I wrote. According to Wikipedia's guidelines on notability "Sources used to support a claim of notability include independent, reliable publications in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, television documentaries, websites, and published reports by consumer watchdog organizations[3] except for the following"

Two of my sources are from highly regarded newspapers and the third is a CNN interview which is a national coverage. If you could please explain what makes these 3 sources not notable enough I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you.

2602:304:68C7:78B0:F136:3C99:4981:8737 (talk) 05:22, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's a good article but other people may question if the subject is notable from those three sources. If they are other good sources, it would be good to add them. Cheers! SwisterTwister talk 15:49, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No Man's Land (2013 British film)

Hi there, you had mentioned in this discussion that this film's notability is suspect. The page is now orphaned (and essentially unreferenced). I'm wondering if you think it should be listed at AFD? Timmyshin (talk) 03:37, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled?

Is there any particular reason you do not have the autopatrolled user right? VQuakr (talk) 06:20, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've never requested it and no has ever given it to me themselves but I think I'll start using it. Materialscientist Would you mind adding autopatrolled to my tools? Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 04:34, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message: Done. I don't normally assign permissions (you're the first one I've granted permissions to versus removing them), so don't make me look bad. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:35, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol

When you tag a new page for deletion or cleanup, make sure it's been mark as patrolled. Thanks. --I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 05:28, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I missed that one. SwisterTwister talk 05:31, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SwisterTwister,

I have submitted, and was denied, a page for Freedom Network USA https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Freedom_Network_USA. This message is in response to your comment on the submission: The article contains too many primary links and thus needs more third-party sources like good news coverage.

I do want to thank you for your time in reviewing my submission. As I am completely new to this process, I would love to get your feedback as far as how I can improve the submission to wikipedia standards. This organization is doing great, reputable work in the field of human trafficking, and it would be great to have wikipedia representation.

I felt I followed the guideline regarding 'notability' by providing sources that adhere to: "reliable sources independent of the organization have discussed it." These sites include:

[[ http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/President-Obama-Announces-Another-Key-State-Department-Post/%7Cwhitehouse.gov]], which is the official governmental website of The White House and President Barack Obama of the United States

The United States Department of Justice website at, source content mentioned at: http://www.justice.gov/usao/nye/pr/2013/2013sep20.html

The submission contains 23 third-party resources, while supplementing with 10 resources directly from Freedom Network regarding Leadership and internal processes. How many third-party references are typically required to consider the evidence as sufficient? It is an option to remove all internal resources and only provide third-party if necessary. Is there a golden ratio to strive for?

Organizations used as reference including CAST LA and CIW have been existence for many years and have received great notability in the United States and globally. Both CAST LA and CIW are member organizations of Freedom Network USA.

CAST LA was honored by The United Nations, as evidenced [[ http://www.castla.org/cast-at-the-united-nations%7Chere]] and in the submission. CIW was recognized with the 2014 Clinton Global Citizen Award, and the 2015 Presidential Medal.

I am providing this additional information because I want to inquire about how to provide more reputable resources to represent the success and notability of the Freedom Network USA. If you have suggestions, I would greatly appreciate any help and assistance!

Thank you for your time and consideration,

Luz

Luz2102 (talk) 17:55, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Great job on pages! Wgolf (talk) 21:36, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Wgolf: Thanks! I wouldn't mind some help with the back pages of NPP (trying to review as many as I can). SwisterTwister talk 21:38, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, SwisterTwister. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:Page Curation.
Message added 07:00, 17 June 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi, there. I see the note you put on the International Children's Fund. I am a little confused by this as I have found third-party sources in the references. It's a small charity, so there is a not a lot written about it, but I do have a fair number of references for it. If you could elaborate on what you think it needs, I would be happy to try and improve it. Thanks! CdbgLaurie (talk) 15:38, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Morrell entry

Dear SwisterTwister.

I am having difficulty understanding why you rejected my submitted biographical entry for Dan Morrell. There are numerous links to other websites and references to highly reputable third-party sources. Dan Morrell is clearly a notable figure, being a leading and active pioneer in several notable areas of current interest and the person who coined the term 'carbon neutral', one of the most significant terms of the age. He is also the subject of a forthcoming biography by the well-known writer/journalist Rosie Boycott. This very night CHANT Live, the band he started with the famous record producer Martin Glover are playing in front of an expected 30,000 crowd at Stonehenge. So I would be very grateful if you could point out the problems to help me get it right. I offered to get this organised for Dan, so I find myself in a tricky situation.

Thank you and best wishes,

Guy Ogilvy

Guy Ogilvy (talk) 07:20, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

XARA


as you requested - added references for notability

Draft: Ciklum

Hello Swister twister, thanks for reviewing my article ( Draft:Ciklum). I provided more information in reference citations with more credible sources ( FDiIntelligence / Financial Times article, etc.) , and updated Infobox company. Please let me know if this works better. Nikols70 (talk) 08:26, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Live ‘n Wild, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Sulfurboy (talk) 01:10, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, SwisterTwister. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Costa Rican National Socialist Party.
Message added 03:03, 24 June 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Question posted at the discussion for you. North America1000 03:03, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What's problem there sir i can help you cuz i was know navjit buttar cuz i'm also from punjab so tell me what i have to do — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.253.25.191 (talk) 09:38, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

09:50:14, 24 June 2015 review of submission by Zuto-Zuto


Hi I have listened to your request and add a lot more references. Would you be able to review it for me please? Thanks Zuto-Zuto (talk) 09:50, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Editor's Barnstar
Thanks for all the help and keep up the good work Uaearthub (talk) 07:49, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

page

Hi Pls can you tell me which parts i need to remove because all things is included contain with useful information regarding online food. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mealvilla (talk • contribs) 05:41, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Mealvilla: - If you're thinking of submitting that as an article, it can't be accepted as it sounds too promotional and would not elaborate the notability. To learn more about editing, see Wikipedia:New contributors' help page and User:SwisterTwister/Welcome. SwisterTwister talk 06:40, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re: User:Yash~enwiki

Re your message: Done. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:29, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Your new page patrol work is very much appreciated! Winner 42 Talk to me! 04:54, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Winner 42 Thanks very much, I've seen you around too. Happy editing! SwisterTwister talk 05:06, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Another AFD that may interest you

If that AFD on Félix Malpica Valverde interested you, I have two more AFDs on Mexican radio that have not received any response: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stereo Hits and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grupo FM. Raymie (t • c) 20:45, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Carrie Judd Montgomery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Episcopalian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, SwisterTwister. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andre The Hilarious Hypnotist.
Message added 00:28, 9 July 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

North America1000 00:28, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tryad Entry

. greetings !

thanks for your work with wikipedia .

wanted to let you know that tryad's album 'listen' was the first independent apple itunes lp release and gathered some press as a result . : .

http://www.macobserver.com/tmo/article/listen_by_tryad_first_non-apple_itunes_lp_release/

in addition, i was interviewed on the 'music manumit' podcast regarding our open creative commons musical creation process . : .

http://www.musicmanumit.com/2013/07/tryad-130714-music-manumit-podcast.html

please consider allowing the tryad entry to remain . we have many growing fans around the world . our music has broadcast on a number of television networks including pbs and cnn . : .

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ldtluH3-Afs

thanks for your time *

Vavrek (talk) 06:01, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Captain Planet

Template:Captain Planet has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.—Godsy(TALKCONT) 00:14, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation requested to your revert

Hi I see youve reverted sourced references to the article on Seeman can you please explain why?

Because I'm not sure why it needs so many references for that particular area and per the lengthy talk at the talk page. SwisterTwister talk 20:25, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response, I collected many references precisely because I expected trouble: even with so many references given why is there still any ambiguity wrt the person's name? Why are edits reverting the persons first name being allowed and why arent THOSE edits being considered vandalism? Given youve also read through the talk page, do you buy the arguments supporting the case for removing the persons first name? Do you believe so many sources made the same "printing mistake" and expect a passport/birth certificate to substantiate the first name? Thanks once again for responding.

I'd take whatever looks most sensible. SwisterTwister talk 21:47, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Good.  I am interested in having a honest discussion with a neutral entity here and I am glad if I can take this up with you.  Can you please list what was your deciding factor in concluding that the person's first name is ambiguous?  If the different sources dont seem to convince you, what did you find about the argument against the given name in the talk page that convinced you?  You obviously cant find the printing mistake theory sensible.  
If your argument is to go by most common usage, I agree partially, the first name need not be mentioned everywhere, but has to be mentioned in wiki as adding it makes the article more comprehensive.  The sources listing the first name has to be done justice for.  Can I list this under "Birth/Other names"?
About your last paragraph, yes. SwisterTwister talk 23:04, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am thankful for your reasonable response. I will add this name in the Born section of the article. But, I believe this will not be over, there will be comebacks but I am sure you will be as vigilant with them as you were with me.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ellie Greenwich (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Johnny Ray
Lyle Ashton Harris (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to University of New York

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Pahal (scheme), and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Sulfurboy (talk) 23:02, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on your user page, User talk:Nizam Matches Private Limited, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes or publicises a company, product, group or service, and which is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages; user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you can indicate why the page is not blatant advertising, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: Click here to contest this speedy deletion which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy deletion candidate). Doing so will take you to your user talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also edit this page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would help make it encyclopedic. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dawn Bard (talk) 14:15, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...

for patrolling so much of my contributions!! --ExperiencedArticleFixer (talk) 18:22, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

Thanks for your thoughtful research and your hard work! Enjoy some baklava! :-) —МандичкаYO 😜 22:58, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I thought so as well. Although it might be time to remove the wiki-vacation notice as you seem like a active editor! Liz Read! Talk! 23:10, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sir Thank you for your suggestion and warm welcome for the page Industrial Robotics Training Centre (AKGEC-KUKA)! I will be implementing your suggestions soon. Regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Acaditi (talk • contribs) 06:39, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Upper Tamakoshi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dolakha (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rushing to AFD

I urge you , in all sincerity, to slow down and spend a little more time on WP:BEFORE. With something like Abdulla al-Hadj, rushing to AFD after searching for a transliterated name under the particular spelling that happened to appear on the page was, well... Just please slow down and try a few variant searches when dealing with long-standing, or even with new articles that have at least one source and are prima facie plausible. But especially wnen dealing with names that are transliterated from another alphabet. If I sound exasperated, it is because I can see that you do constant, thankless, yoeman's labor bringing a lot of bad, mostly new articles to AFD. But I also spend a lot of time checking assertions you make about lack of sources that turn out to have merely been careless searches. Maybe try just tagging for notability sometimes, especially when working in unfamiliar territory. E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:04, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I hear you but I often like other users will nominate it because it's still a concern and others may have better access to sourcing past my abilities (foreign language, offline, etc.). I often consider opening an RfC but think AfD may be a better option sometimes if it seems too troubling. It's worth noting I'll try and improve the article as much as I can like you and also tag it as needed. Cheers! SwisterTwister talk 19:19, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Colin Moriarty

The "Vita Fetish" thing are trolls regarding an article he wrote years ago saying that the PlayStation Vita would be a success. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:22, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Arcata Community Recycling Center

I was wondering if you might take a look at current state of the article with a view to withdrawing your AfD nomination. Thanks. —Tim /// Carrite (talk) 20:16, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I was dead busy with my university exams which got over just yesterday. Thanks for replying to the post. Enjoy the cookie :) — Yash! (Y) 08:19, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

afds

Ivery much appreciate your notices. I no longer can keep track myself of the daily list , the way I once used to, but I'll always try to comment on something where there have been insufficient comments (except in popular music and sport, where any comments of mine may produce more confusion than assistance). DGG ( talk ) 08:16, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Belo Platno

Hello, there are three brand new in-line references in Belo Platno article. Please, check if it is OK now. (And have a nice day.) --Stripar (talk) 09:23, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for patrolling Hopkins County Courthouse, SwisterTwister! It is much appreciated! Michael Barera (talk) 22:49, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RFA

Hello SwisterTwister, I have noticed your edit count of 54,000+ contribs and your activity on AFD. Have you considered to request for adminship? I am more than welcome to nominate you if you wish. Racer-Ωmegα 03:21, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I had in 2012 (see Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/SwisterTwister) and it was not a good experience (partly what caused a wikibreak). Thanks but no thanks at least for now (I've found it to be a little too stressful). Cheers! :) SwisterTwister talk 05:01, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Tom Morris. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Khaireni, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. —Tom Morris (talk) 12:28, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. :) In reviewing listings at WP:SCV, I see that you removed a CSB notice from Green Party of Malaysia with a note that "Nothing blatant here."

I'm afraid you may have overlooked the issue, as content I just removed from the article was copied verbatim from the source. For a particularly egregious example:

Article text Source text
Fifty-odd years after independence from British colonial rule, Malaysian politics has now reached the stage whereby race-based political parties no longer have any relevance or valid currency. In the past fifty plus years, race-based politics has proven to be divisive and unhealthy for our nation. This is because the issue of race has become increasingly irrelevant in the emerging political landscape of Malaysia. Politicians who play the racial card will soon find themselves with no followers, or cronies, either, for that matter. Fifty-odd years after independence from British colonial rule, Malaysian politics has now reached the stage whereby race-based political parties no longer have any relevance or valid currency. In the past fifty plus years, race-based politics has proven to be divisive and unhealthy for our nation. This is because the issue of race has become increasingly irrelevant in the emerging political landscape of Malaysia. Politicians who play the racial card will soon find themselves with no followers, or cronies, either, for that matter.

While I can't be sure how this was overlooked, I wonder if you are relying on the bots that compare text? In this case, the bots could not function properly on the page and so could not help in identifying the issue. In such situations, we have to do a visual comparison. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:12, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In this case, I simply looked at the report. Often, I'll also watch the article for any improvement or changes. SwisterTwister talk 17:04, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Related to this, I don't really understand this removal. Fortunately, this copyright problem was reparable (and I have now repaired it), whereas the other simply required removal of copied content. Can you explain what you meant? --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:09, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I first looked at the Duplicator Report (which has been extremely slow loading) and looking at the lycaeum website, it seems to have a Wiki format but I'm not sure if it is a Wiki website (searches find zero results). SwisterTwister talk 17:11, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That the site looks like a wiki doesn't help avoid it being a blatant copyright issue, I'm afraid; there are many wikis which are not compatibly licensed with ours. It's a good idea to look at the talk page when evaluating these things; in this case, it contains the clue to resolving the copyright issue. The contributor quite rightly noted that the website she was flagged as copying actually copied from another Wikipedia article - but that means so did she, and Wikipedia's content is not public domain. In this case, the problem is fixed according to the instructions at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. If you're not able to find the issue, you might want to ask for assistance or just leave the CSB notice alone so somebody else can look. The notice offers some protection to copyright holders and our reusers in the event that infringement does occur, as it at least alerts them to the problem. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:12, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing my article Comment

Thank you for reviewing my article The MAGIC criteria, it's the first one I've created. What does it mean that it has been reviewed? -- PeterLFlomPhD (talk) 00:03, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PeterLFlomPhD It simply means a third-party user has reviewed it as part of the New Pages Patrol. Cheers! SwisterTwister talk 02:16, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the New Article review

Thanks for the New Article review of Hanoi exhibition Icarusgeek (talk) 06:42, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Camilla Kenyon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. John's Presbyterian Church (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki love mislabeled?

After posting recently to Liz's talk page, I scanned up and was startled to see that I had sent her a wiki love message. At the moment it says "Sphilbrick has given you a fresh pie!" After a tiny bit of investigation, it appears that the editor name is replaced with whomever last edited the page. I haven't looked closely enough to see why this is so, but wanted to bring it to your attention. Do you see the same thing I see? I wondered if somehow it displays whoever is currently viewing the page although I don't know how to do that.--S Philbrick(Talk) 18:45, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sphilbrick Yes I noticed that and attempted fix it multiple times and hopefully it works with this last one. If not, it may be something with the script. SwisterTwister talk 20:34, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Looks fixed.--S Philbrick(Talk) 20:47, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Spam accounts

I blocked the Rezidence.lk account and deleted their spam. We'll see if they come back or not. I also blocked the VoIP4CallCenters account. These random article spammers make me laugh at what they hit. Like the other day when a cow supplier hit a space article. Pigs Cows in Space!!! -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:16, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gogo Dodo Whether a bot or not, they may not be familiar with how the website works and may be getting there through random articles (random article button included). SwisterTwister talk 20:34, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That's what I meant. I think they are hitting the random article button. The Rezidence.lk account was likely not a bot due to the way it made a new section. VoIP4CallCenters may be, but probably not. The cow one was definitely not a bot. Either way, it was some poor SEO work. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:02, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Enrique Gatti

Re your message: I think I'd go with a redirect to the band's article. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:54, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 19:01:53, 5 August 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by NHfootballfan


Hello SwisterTwister, my recent attmept at creating the page "KBACE Technologies, Inc." was declined due to lack of notariety, and it has been suggested to find more, reliable sources. Is the current problem that there is too few sources, or that they aren't relaible enough?

Thanks for your feedback!

NHfootballfan (talk) 19:01, 5 August 2015 (UTC)NHfootballfan[reply]

NHfootballfan (talk) 19:01, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NHfootballfan It's not exactly the reliability, it's more that it needs better coverage sources (too few sources I suppose summarizes it). SwisterTwister talk 19:07, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you...

...for patrolling my first en-step. Greetings from Hamburg. :-) --Koyaanis (talk) 20:55, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Technical note

Just a quick request — when you're adding a debate to the AFD log, could you put it on a new line? If two debates are transcluded on the same line, the second one gets messed up; see the Farleon entry near the top of this revision. Lest I be unclear, I'm not complaining at you; I just figured it was something you'd not known. I'd never noticed this until a few minutes ago. Nyttend (talk) 22:33, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nyttend Thanks for the notification, copying and pasting is different through mobile even when using desktop version so it always gets it close to the other one. Cheers! SwisterTwister talk 22:37, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dominic Durden

I had a look on the web about this person. They seem to have a fair bit of coverage, but I haven't looked closely. However, the real problem is that the article may be a paraphrase of this news piece I found. I'll try to clean it up later today. —George8211 / T 11:10, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article curation

Conejito pls. --Bakebread (talk) 02:18, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYKs

I am writing to acknowledge your message to me. I will get back to you in depth soon hopefully (I'm working on an article that I'm trying to get to nominatable form by Monday, and time on my weekends is usually short). Daniel Case (talk) 17:56, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Review?

What does this mean: "(Page curation log); 19:48 . . SwisterTwister (talk | contribs) marked Second APC Philadelfi road ambush as reviewed"

Regards, Jokkmokks-Goran (talk) 16:27, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It has been reviewed by a third-party user as part of the New Pages Patrol. SwisterTwister talk 16:29, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Arthistorian1977. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, World Government (Mormonism), and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 06:12, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Lee

You may want to have a look at Mike Lee.The Cross Bearer (talk) 04:21, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2016 Kids' Choice Awards

Hello, I saw that you recently reviewed the 2016 Kids' Choice Awards page. I just wanted to let you know that, the article has no sources whatsoever. No nominations has been announced for that particular award show yet, as it will be held next year and even the date of the show is still not confirmed. The page has been created by known ip vandal. It is operating through multiple ip's and vandalizing number of Wikipedia articles. He or she is not communicating with other editors at all. All the information, provided in the article was fake, you can check yourself. I just wanted to enlighten you on this matter. Regards--Jockzain (talk) 23:01, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jockzain Ah, thanks for mentioning that and I was curious about that being unsourced but I never actually looked at the history. It may need to be protected so Gogo Dodo, would you be willing? Cheers! SwisterTwister talk 23:06, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, and yes it will be good if the article can get protection.--Jockzain (talk) 23:22, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done. WP:RFPP might have been a little quicker, though it wasn't time critical. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:55, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My Love from the Star (film), Patrolled

To SwisterTwister thanks for patrolling a page of this filmMarkHerson (talk) 04:54, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Do you have an opinion on User_talk:MBisanz#The_Accidentals? MBisanz talk 23:33, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your turn

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali Shahbaz, Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Ruse (book), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiran Bir Sethi, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thom Serafin, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Davindra Singh (2nd nomination), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ReGlobe (2nd nomination) DGG ( talk ) 05:21, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DGG Hey Dave, I'm always watching for the AfDs you start and I hope you had fun with those. :) Simply FYI, I don't know sometimes whether pinging you and talk page messaging is better and quicker (a few months ago, I remember I pinged at several individual AfDs and you never responded there) but I appreciate your attention with that long list. Cheers! SwisterTwister talk 05:37, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
At present, it is better to notify me on my talk page, so I can do them together, but I will usually see a ping also. Five or 6 a day is no problem.--even 10--it's better than looking through the whole list. I might possibly not answer a ping when I have no useful comment. DGG ( talk ) 13:33, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adonnis

I need help undeleting this page Adonnis - the artist has had significant exposure and is of notability. He's been featured on MTV and has an extensive history of releases

License2Kill The best thing would be to make a sandbox version of it (User:License2Kill/Sandbox) and add as much as possible especially good sources to establish notability. It has to be a good version so the previous consensus for deletion is no longer applicable. If he's not independently notable, he can be mentioned at a relevant article. SwisterTwister talk 20:27, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Shoy. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, The Partnership (disambiguation), and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. shoy (reactions) 20:23, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hamilton (musical)

You have got to get yourself tickets to see this show!E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:59, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
Hi David, Recently you have been pouring over me random gifts of reviews in many of my articles. So I cannot stay without offering you this Barnstar. Keep your good work as it is. Cheers! Ashish Lohorung (talk) 10:55, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 08:23:40, 20 August 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Hag da bard


I do not see the reason for your decline since this is not a organisation or company. VPNEncap is free OpenSource Software for Linux Distributions which is comparable to TOR but better - According to this fact this cannot be judged by the rules for companies or organisations. Please give some adequat hint for soluting this issue.

Hag da bard (talk) 08:23, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, in case, I meant to say product. The article still could better sources and the current tone sounds more like a guide. If you need further help, see your welcome links or ask here again. Cheers! SwisterTwister talk 15:56, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article recovery

Is there any way to have the Andrew Phillip Almanza article recovered? Not sure why it was deleted if he is on many television shows and commercials and gets police escorts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamescott222 (talk • contribs) 01:07, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYKs

Hi.

DYK is to showcase new content. For Lester Dragstedt I cannot see how it would qualify for DYK, it is not new, it is not expanded 5 times in the last week, and it is not a Good article. Similarly Woolrich has not improved much in the last week. Similarly for Broadnose sevengill shark your improvements were in June, so it is a bit late to nominate in August (and I suspect not a 5× size boost). And for Sharpnose sevengill shark nothing has changed since February. So unfortunately they would all fail a DYK nomination. Sorry to let you hear the bad news. For many years I avoided DYK because I thought it was too complicated, and then I found it hard to get something ready in 5 days after I started it. My name is on the list as someone who can move stuff to the queue. But I also do some reviews and nominations. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:37, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Graeme Bartlett Hmm, very well, I thought those snippets that I listed were interesting enough for a DYK (especially judging from what I see pass as DYK sometimes). It's worth mentioning I would've nominated them myself sooner if it wasn't I find the DYK listing process too challenging. FYI, I never mentioned sharpnose sevengill shark for DYK (only broadnose). SwisterTwister talk 06:42, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The hooks are fine, it is just the articles are not new enough. To qualify you could upgrade them to good article status! Or the next article you start could perhaps qualify. I can still help you nominate one if you want assistance. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:21, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help Me

I've been trying to get the deletion sorting tool (APerson's script) to work but it's not. I'd sincerely like some help with this. SwisterTwister talk 07:36, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've managed to get this working by going to Special:MyPage/Skin.js then vector.js (if that's the theme you're using), and adding {{subst:iusc|User:APerson/delsort.js}}. You'll then need to force a refresh. Could you let me know if that works? Samuel Tarling (talk) 08:35, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Samtar: That was it and it works excellently now! Thanks, SwisterTwister talk 03:26, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kithara

I moved the article Kithara to Cithara on 12 April 2013‎. I have restored the redirect after the mess created by an IP address. If they want to create an article they will have to create one with a dab extension. -- PBS (talk) 08:48, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kristine Sa AfD

  • Hi SwisterTwister, thank you for pinging me in the AfD for Kristine Sa. Wow...2007 was when I participated in the original AfD? I don't remember that AfD or why I commented there! :D I shall not be participating in this new AfD - mainly because I moved away from AfD long ago - but I wanted to thank you for notifying me; it is appreciated. :) Best. Acalamari 10:24, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion/Stephen Marchionda

Greetings,

I'm glad this discussion is taking place as I've been wanting to update the information in this article. I am very much a newbie here, so please advise. I've added material to the page Articles for deletion/Stephen Marchionda and will add more references soon. Please check if you can and excuse me if not properly done..

Best wishes, Boxstrum (talk) 13:41, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Multipolarity of Gamma Radiation

Hi SwisterTwister, you have recently patrolled my article on Multipolarity. What does patrolling mean? HPaul (talk) 19:17, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It means it has been patrolled by a third-party user as part of the New Pages Patrol. SwisterTwister talk 19:28, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you!HPaul (talk) 19:13, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Articles

Re your message: Per the outcome of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julia Winter, the article should be a redirect. No additional claim towards notability has been added in the recent edits. There were no additional roles added or reliable citations establishing her notability beyond Charlie and the Chocolate Factory.

Jordan Fry at least has additional roles since Charlie and the Chocolate Factory and there has been no AfD regarding the article, so it could be argued either way (redirect or full article). You might consider listing the article for AfD to settle the matter.

Also you likely have a logged out sockpuppet of FrozenFan2. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:51, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Gogo Dodo: I was aware of the AfD but I still wondered whether it should be protected. SwisterTwister talk 04:56, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, that seems reasonable. I semi-protected it for a year. If a year passes and she has new roles, then it can be reconsidered. Though if she hasn't had a new role in 10 years, it doesn't seem likely anything will change in a year. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:06, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The New Page Patroller's Barnstar
12,987 patrolls in the last 12 months. No mean accomplishment! Keep up the good work.. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:48, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WikiProject TAFI

Hello, SwisterTwister. You're invited to join WikiProject Today's articles for improvement, a project dedicated to significantly improving articles with collaborative editing in a week's time.

Feel free to nominate an article for improvement at the project's Article nomination board. If interested in joining, please add your name to the list of members. Thanks for your consideration. North America1000 07:55, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bājūrī Ibrāhīm, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BRILL (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cadsoft Corporation

I don't think I'm the person you wanted to ask about this article. I just did some early wikification. RJFJR (talk) 15:36, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Tokens The Animated Series

Hey, I suspect that as per WP:BADNAC you should not have closed this as you are not an administrator and so can't delete the page. Everymorning (talk) 22:37, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Everymorning Yes but that was an obvious delete (FWIW, although I could've waited until it was deleted, deleting admins won't always close it). Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 22:44, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removing CSB tags

Hello, SwisterTwister. In reviewing the SCV listing for August 6th, I see that you removed the CSB tag from this article with a note saying "Fixing slight copy."

There are several issues with this action.

First, if the external site were copyright owner of that content, your fixes would not address the copyright problem.

External site text Wikipedia article text Your changes to text
The flag of Bulgaria (Bulgarian: знаме на България, [znɑmɛ nɑ bɤ̞ɫˈɡɑrijɐ]) is a tricolor consisting of three equal-sized horizontal bands of (from top to bottom) white, green, and red. The flag was first adopted after the Russo-Turkish War (1877–1878), where Bulgaria gained independence. The national flag at times was charged with the state emblem, especially during the People's Republic of Bulgaria. The current flag was re-established with the 1991 Constitution of Bulgaria and was confirmed in a 1998 law. The flag of Bulgaria (Template:Lang-bg, [znamɛ nɐ bɐɫˈɡarijɐ]) is a tricolour consisting of three equal-sized horizontal bands of (from top to bottom) white, green, and red. The flag was first adopted after the Russo-Turkish War (1877–1878), where Bulgaria gained independence. The national flag at times was charged with the state emblem, especially during the People's Republic of Bulgaria. The current flag was re-established with the 1991 Constitution of Bulgaria and was confirmed in a 1998 law. The flag of Bulgaria (Template:Lang-bg, [znamɛ nɐ bɐɫˈɡarijɐ]) is a tricolour consisting of three equal-sized horizontal bands of (from top to bottom) white, green, and red. It was first adopted after the Russo-Turkish War (1877–1878), where Bulgaria gained independence. At times, the national flag was charged with the state emblem, especially during the People's Republic of Bulgaria. The current flag was re-established with the 1991 Constitution of Bulgaria and was confirmed in a 1998 law.

Your edits are too minimal to eradicate the taking of creative content from that source and would at best constitute a derivative work. To eradicate copying concerns, content must be completely rewritten, not modified. Changes like moving words from "The national flag at times was charged " to read "At times, the national flag was charged" will not address the issue. (Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing explains why not in a little more detail.)

However, in this case the external site does not own the copyright. They are in fact copying from the article Flag of Bulgaria. Thus, the copyright infringement is internal from the authors of that article and all the other articles copied into that page. It can be fixed by adding attribution, as discussed earlier, but that attribution is mandatory.

I'm repairing the copyright problems with that article. If you're going to rewrite content that is copied, please be sure to do so from scratch as policy requires. If possible, please be conscious in your new page reviewing of the possibility of copying from mirrors and fix such copyvios caused by copying content without legally required attribution by providing that attribution. Thanks. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:55, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Moonriddengirl Yes, I remember that one well but there wasn't much to change without affecting the article's sensibility so I did the best I could (fixing the most outstanding to me). SwisterTwister talk 19:00, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If copyrighted content can't be removed without affecting the article's sensibility, we delete the article. Or the section. Or whatever it takes to get rid of the copyright violation. You can even blank the article or the section with {{copyvio}} and leave it for somebody else to handle. It is one of our core policies and one of our chief legal policies that content on Wikipedia must be legal. If it's not, it has to go. Please don't remove the CSB notice if you can't figure out how to fix the problem. Let somebody else handle it who does. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:20, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 17:43:56, 1 September 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by MegCuse


I received some feedback on adding additional citations, please let me know if there are specific areas in the submission you’d like me to address with more citations.

MegCuse (talk) 17:43, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MegCuse (talk) 17:43, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

multiple nominations

When you do want to nominate multiple pages at one time, there's aspecial procedure, given at WP:AFD. I consider it unduly complicated, and it can't be done with Huggle. I've used it a very few times, but what I usually do is nominate the articles separately, but next to each other., by preparing them first, and then clicking submit for both within a few seconds. DGG ( talk ) 16:53, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DGG I've considered it and often will but I find these articles randomly (especially searching for long-lived fabricated ones) so I never know what I'll find. Speaking of fabricated, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Robichaux is nearing snow delete and the subject appeared quite fabricated. Cheers! SwisterTwister talk 18:45, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Problem is, doing it by just adding the name in the Afd rationale does not set up the page notices & templates. DGG ( talk ) 04:11, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Two things

Re your message: I blocked the account and the article has already been protected by Favonian. You should probably use WP:UAA and WP:RFPP next time. While I am usually here, I do disappear from time to time. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:53, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Qwertyus. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Moncef Ouhaibi, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 18:25, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Aftermath American Band

I was surprised to see this page nominated for deletion a few days ago. Even more surprised that you wanted to delete it for now despite what you wrote about your own research. The band has a 30 year history that includes countless magazine articles by the largest metal magazines in the world. Multiple labels have released their material in fact Shadow Kingdom Records reissued their Eyes of Tomorrow record yesterday. Blabbdermouth.net featured their comeback last month. That site has 3 million unique visitors a month. The band was also feature in Gary Sharpe Young's book A-Z of Thrash Metal. Included on the Metal Forces' Compilation Scream Your Brains Out. And they sued Dr. Dre for trademark infringement. In terms of citations, the lawsuit is cited, the record labels are listed, the book is cited. How and what needs to be done to improve the citations? Zoident (talk) 15:13, 5 September 2015 (UTC)Zoident[reply]

Michael Clifford

Hiya its Courtneyxox here and i see you changed michaels page. If possible can you leave it unchanged for a week as it's a prank for the 5SOS fam not to believe everything they see online and read about the boys. Thank you ever so much Courtneyxox (talk) 21:56, 5 September 2015 (UTC)Courtneyxox Courtneyxox (talk) 21:56, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, Wikipedia is not here to play games. If you want to learn more about editing, see Wikipedia:Welcome, Wikipedia:Young and Wikipedia:New contributors' help page. SwisterTwister talk 21:59, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Its just a harmless prank why take things seriously.Whats wrong with teaching people what they read is possibly a lie. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Courtneyxox (talk • contribs) 22:03, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to experiment editing, use the Wikipedia:Sandbox. SwisterTwister talk 22:06, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sunders

Hello SwisterTwister, your again redirect is wrong! Therefore I deleted it before and only the headline must than be deleted. Thanks in advance and regards. -- Sweepy (talk) 19:01, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

However, the Wiktionary link is also at the disambiguation and adding the "s" is plausible for someone searching any of those articles. The best way to get redirect pages deleted is either by speedy or WP:RfD. SwisterTwister talk 19:08, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Center for Healthcare Innovation Article Draft

Hello,

I am a first time article author and would appreciate any guidance you could give me on how to better improve my article so it can be published. How many sources would you recommend I include? Here is the link to my draft: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Daisy_Ren_1991/sandbox If I save a draft and redo the sources (before I resubmit the article for publication), are you willing to look at it again? Daisy Ren 1991 (talk) 14:22, 9 September 2015 (UTC)Daisy[reply]

Page Nomination

Dear SwisterTwister. Hello,I just want to know why you added a deletion nomination to the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayman_Alatar If the reason because you don't find resources that's because the title was incorrect and finally I recorrected it . So please remove the nomination.I'll write more information about the famous Libyan singer in the next few days. Thanks Emmakarima (talk) 23:44, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William Blassingame, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grayson County (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 14:52:51, 10 September 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by MegCuse


Hi. I wanted to check on the status of the Green BEAN Delivery page I created. Thanks!

MegCuse (talk) 14:52, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MegCuse (talk) 14:52, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

16:08:33, 10 September 2015 review of submission by Clairedongo


I believe the sources I listed are credible and the subject is a notable figure in our society. Clairedongo (talk) 16:08, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why does everyone keep erasing Drover's Secret Life?

Hi, I created the page Drover's Secret Life. Since it's inception, everyone has been bent on erasing it, even though it is notable. Why is it that there an individual article for every single Twilight character, when those books have such terrible reviews, but something that has won multiple awards keeps being reverted? I'm just wondering what the reasoning behind this is. White Arabian mare (talk) 01:06, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I hear you (I'm very much not a fan of Twilight) but it's a matter of there's enough for an (notable) article. SwisterTwister talk 01:41, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I hate Twilight too. It's just that Hank the Cowdog has won several awards, and there's actually a request on the talk page (from 2008) for each book to have its own article. I had written a complete summary, character list, and added references, and then another user erased it all. Sigh.😔 White Arabian mare (talk) 16:24, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Conferred for excellent work at AfD. At a time when we desperately need more opinions at deletion discussions, I find a useful vote from you at just about all of them! Sam Walton (talk) 10:10, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Samwalton9 Thanks very much, I prefer working at AfD and patrolling pages rather than being involved with drama. SwisterTwister talk 16:48, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I was actually coming by to say exactly the same thing! Every time I turn around, you have added a vote with quality research. So double above.New Media Theorist (talk) 07:02, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
New Media Theorist Thanks! It's nice to see so many good users at AfD and certainly better than being involved with drama. Cheers and greetings from Texas (not sure if we share the same time zone where ever you're in Canada), SwisterTwister talk 07:07, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm in Quebec, which is always an hour later and 20 degrees celcius colder than TexasNew Media Theorist (talk) 07:11, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
New Media Theorist Yeah, it's getting closer to winter here and the weather is cooling (staying mostly 80s and 70s (F) with close encounters of 60s (F)). I'm assuming you're at a night owl with it being 3AM (I'm going to be going to bed here soon). Cheers! SwisterTwister talk 07:18, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I concur with this barnstar. You have been doing admirable work in AfDs, demonstrating properly how to !vote. LibStar (talk) 08:06, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Editing Trustpilot's article

Hi SwisterTwister, I was in contact with FreeRangeFrog in August, but have not heard from that user in a while now. I saw that you posted something on his/her page, so I hope it is alright that I am contacting you here. I had begun the process of editing Trustpilot's article, but have not received any feedback. As I wrote on the talk page, I have suggested edits and called for feedback before editing the actual page. Before going any further, I would really like a wikipedia editor to have a look at my suggestions so the edits can be a collaborative process. Is this something you could help with? Any feedback would be greatly appreciated :) Cheers, TrustieCPH (talk) 08:34, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited José Antonio Lacayo de Briones y Palacios, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Galicia, Viana and La Rioja (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:19, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

nre Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agradoot

Just to let you know, since you opined a delete, the article has been well and properly sourced and the nominator has withdrawn and changed to a "keep" himself. I was going to close it, but wanted to let you have the opportunity to review your opinion. However, you need not change your !vote. Just wanted to keep you in the loop. Best, Schmidt, Michael Q. 14:32, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MichaelQSchmidt Yes, the article looks good now. SwisterTwister talk 17:54, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for looking back in. checkY Schmidt, Michael Q. 22:59, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Hemp Trading Company

Hi! Just done a cleanup of The Hemp Trading Company - hope it looks good to you now. Still need to find places to link to it from, but I actually quite enjoyed researching it...! Mabalu (talk) 18:42, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, yes, I actually looked it earlier so the sources are better now. While it may not be like Woolrich (company) (which I improved), it is better now and no one likes environmentalism more than me. Cheers Mabalu! SwisterTwister talk 18:48, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Second party input needed...

Hi David,

I've seen you give solid advice in AFD, so I thought I'd ask you to check out this edit, where an anon reverted my removal of what I considered to be a non-notable tradition: I don't want to start an edit war. --Slashme (talk) 19:55, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hi! Just wanted to thank you for your assistance in responding to some of the AfC queries I got on my talk page. Appreciate the help. Take care. Onel5969 TT me 22:00, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Onel5969 Absolutely, I enjoy seeing you around and am more than happy to help. SwisterTwister talk 23:43, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 18 September

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SiwsterTwister, I wanted to thank you for your contribution to the page "José Antonio Lacayo de Briones y Palacios" where you added several footnotes. I intend to also dedicate time to include more footnotes and improve the suggestions that appear on the page. There are several publications that make reference to this person (i.e., the Geneological Academy of Guatemala, the Revista Conservadora de Nicaragua, a History of Nicaragua written inthe XIXth century by Tomás Ayón, and other publications). I also would like to thank you for sending me your tips about editing and creating pages in Wikipedia. They look uqite useful and, to be honest, I am a total rookie in this matter, but I intend to be more dexterous eventually! Thanks again. Ralacayo Ralacayo (talk) 01:18, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Creation of Akhtar Raza Khan

I dont know why you people are beheaving so biased. The article is properly sourced with 3rd party references and it full fills all the guidlines. Ejaz92 (talk) 07:23, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 16:48:04, 20 September 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Cmurphey80


I submitted DiCentral for the third time to be reviewed. I waited almost three weeks just to have it turned down for the same reasons. To update the article I completely rewrote as I went through competitors that do have wiki pages to make sure it fit the notability guidelines. I followed several companies to get my third party resources. Sps Commerence, Opentext, and Trilogy Company. If they are accepted and we are not, I can't figure out what the difference is. Please advise, should the companies I mentioned be deleted off wikipedia?. Cmurphey80 (talk) 16:48, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfDs for American football players

Hey, Swister, I saw that you were adding the delete-sort notices for various AfDs for sportspersons. There appear to be a number of AfDs for American football players which are are not listed under the American football-related AfD delete sort -- I'd be grateful if you would add that to your to-do list. If you need help identifying the AfDs, please let me know. Cheers and thanks for helping out with the delete sorts. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 06:01, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely, it would be easier and simpler if you were to identify them, yes. Thanks, SwisterTwister talk 06:04, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Swister, currently pending AfDs for American football players:

I'll review the rest of the general sports-related AfD list, too, and let you know. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 01:58, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

09:02:53, 21 September 2015 review of submission by Arrt75012


Hello, This is Arrt75012, about the article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Philippe_Adrien_(English) I spoke with Onel5969 and did everything he asked me to concerning notability and POV ; there are 30 external links towards completely independent sources. What can I do to improve the notability of this article ? Thank you

16:45:05, 21 September 2015 review of submission by C S Chaffee



Regarding your review and rejection of Draft: Chet Bowers, Your comment was that the subject "seems" notable but that the article needs more third party references and you name newspapers and media in particular. The references I have included are published, third party (under Wikipedias own definition of third party) comments that refer to the subject or his work. These references come from people who have their own established careers as best selling authors, researchers, educators, lawyers, etc. Just guessing, but I'd say that more people have been notable in their fields and have had a notable impact within their genre, than have been interviewed by CNN or Newsweek. I will add more references but I was attempting to keep the article as succinct and simple as possible.C S Chaffee (talk) 16:45, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dropping in, C S Chaffee, an extensive ideas section like you used is usually inappropriate here. Justifying an inclusion by saying that someone said "This book would never have come without the years of mentorship offered to all of us by Chet Bowers." is not appropriate either, because in a forward, authors normally cite everyone they can think of, as it's taken as an insult to be omitted. Such forwards in book are basically mutual back-scratching. An extensive quote from a review is not used either, if the reviewer is not an authority--most academic book reviews are done by junior people. You cannot say "Bowers' experience with both Western and aboriginal cultures, in addition to his contact with scholars representing a broad range of disciplines, " unless there's a reliable 3rd party source. The external links are excessive. Please read WP:EL--one link to his principal website is sufficient, not a link to amazon, and not al ink to misc places where a notice of one of his lectures is posted. DGG ( talk ) 16:57, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

multiple nominations

I don't think handling 5 different bios in one afd is a practical idea, and I closed as non-consensus to allow an immediate renomination. For one thing, it makes it hard to discuss. For another, it makes it hard to close: you seem to have missed one or more of the intricate steps in the manual procedure; one article never got a notice at all, and after the close most of the others didn't update right, and I had to go around updating the talk pages and the articles pages one at a time. When I try it, I usually make some mistake also, so I've stopped trying to use it even when the topics are very closely related. If you do want to use it, stick to two, and verify that both pages get the right notices and that they clear properly after the afd. DGG ( talk ) 16:39, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DGG I hear you but I was hoping to save the trouble of separate nominations and clicks and there were not per se connected but were about the size and in terms of sourcing (questionably notable). FWIW, I made Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ESR Technology with four instead. I'll start the renominations shortly because I feel those all need to be deleted. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 16:55, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Draft:Akhtar Raza Khan

Brother you are declining my submission for review. As you said in the "The amount of sources is somewhat acceptable but could use more and also better information about him and his accomplishments" I am requesting you to please review it soon if the amount of source is acceptable.I have been waiting for 2 month for review. Once you accept it then "more and also better information about him and his accomplishments" could be added by the reader too. Acting on your advice I am trying my best to add more sources and info to it. Thanks... Ejaz92 (talk) 10:29, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Detail in Afd discussions

I notice that we often comment on the same articles in deletion discussions. Is the level of detail that I put in my comments off-putting or do you think that it helps the discussion? examples: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battra, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moonshot (magazine), and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Overflowing Futures. (I admit that I did get a little snide at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vested business brokers.) --Bejnar (talk) 21:19, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bejnar From what I see, they are good votes. SwisterTwister talk 23:36, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, SwisterTwister. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joel Ozborn.
Message added 15:56, 26 September 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Request to revisit the discussion. North America1000 15:56, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfD closures

Hi. Thank you for closing AfDs. When closing as 'Redirect' please remember to include the 'R from X' template on the redirect page so that it adds the correct message and automatically populates the appropriate category. In the case of this page for example , it would be {{R from school}}. I've done it for you this time - take a look. Happy editing! --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:09, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

13:38:33, 29 September 2015 review of submission by Molamrabe


Hi everybody,

The article on "Asiem El Difraoui" was published simultaneously in German and French, both of which have been carefully reviewed and accepted. The submitted version in English contains references to major books and award-winning films created and produced by Mr. El Difraoui. Could you therefor please explain why you consider that the submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability? I can only imagine that there's been a mistake.

Thank you very much in advance for your help!

Careful with WP:CANVAS

As you stated you have did so at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zuma: Tales of a Sexual Gladiator, it might be seen as inappropriate to "ping" users who in the past have opined for deleting many other adult film related articles. In notifying others it IS appropriate under WP:AFD#After nominating: Notify interested projects and editors to review an article's edit history and send a neutral note to any who had made sunbstantial contributions to that article. Cheers Schmidt, Michael Q. 22:27, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MichaelQSchmidt As long as they are interested with that topic and can give feedback about it (whether delete or not), there is consensus. Unlike others, I like to notify anyone who can give a useful comment including past contributors or interested users (who only seem to opine for deletion because they are familiar with that topic). Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 23:14, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Were actual article contributors notified?? Or interested projects?? Or were editors "pinged" who advocated "keeps"??? Their personal "Interest" aside, if an editor does little to improve such topics and is widely known for !voting at AFDs for the removal of such content, bringing their attention to an AFD they would likely find all by themselves could be seen as a possible attempt at Votestacking even were that not the intention. As perception is everything here, I only urge caution. Best, Schmidt, Michael Q. 23:24, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sakharov Center page

Hi! You recently wrote to me about my draft for the Sakharov Center https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ariella_Katz#Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_Sakharov_Center_.28September_19.29 

that, "This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia." Could you tell me about specific sections that are not notable enough and specific sections that need more/different citation than is in the current version? In other words, which specific sections are the problem? Do you have any suggestions specific to my article for making it better?

I really appreciate your help in advance! Ariella Katz (talk) 01:44, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ariella Katz Exactly what I said wih my comment, the article needs more sources about the subject if available. SwisterTwister talk 01:53, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help - Self-Promotion and COI Attack by Competitor

Hello, LauraMaurer recommended that I reach out to you for help. Below is a modified message I had sent to FreeRangeFrog and Wikipedia complaint and have heard NOTHING. I also put this message on the talk pages for Peter Rhse and BU Rob13 as well.

Help is needed. This is Model Mugging regarding evidence of self-promotion and COI regarding attack on us by competitor.

There has been no reply to the talk on Model Mugging. This editing game Wikipedia has does not seem to have any standard rules, especially for libel-slanderous behavior. The last edits to the Model Mugging editing war are wrong.

In a prior edit, Peter Rehse wrote “Wikipedia is not here to advertise any entity but to provide information” – I ask whether rumors is providing information because it falls into Wiki’s tabloid journalism definition. The author of that article says she is writing about rumors.

Why are Wikipedia editors insisting on a source that the author admits to being rumors and from another lying Wikipedia editor?

I am hopeful, because upon reviewing the history of the Model Mugging page, Wikipedia editors saw what Impact was doing in 2005 as self-promotion and personal advertisement. Model Mugging was unaware what Impact was doing at that time.

It is my hope you are simply unaware of what Impact is up to again in 2015.

Do you see a problem with Impact self-advertisement? I put a picture summary report together with a small amount of historical background – please click to view summary report: http://modelmugging.org/history/impact-self-defense-wikipedia-attack.pdf

I have identified tag teaming efforts of Nefariousski in latest Impact Self-Defense attack against us. She is loaded with hypocritical contradictions such as COI, biographies of living persons (BLP), lack of editing balance, failure of editing in a NPOV, disregard to consensus for disputes, using an unreliable source to make libel-slanderous statements. And she is involved in a campaign to promote a competitor, Impact Self-Defense.

The Impact group has repeated misquoted a training incident that occurred 30 years ago that made it into a tabloid magazine written by Peri in Mother Jones. The American Press Association Principles of Journalism identifies "journalism‘s first obligation is to the truth, and also discipline of verification. . ." as listed on the APA website. The Peri article violates the APA’s principles. The source also falls into Wikipedia tabloid journalism definition and sensationalism.

Nefariousski and other writers insist on using the term ‘sexual assault’, which is not used in the article. Even after Nefariousski was corrected by FreeRangeFrog about her inappropriateness of using the term “sexual assault”, she insisted on using it. Additional editors have also changed the current line to be even more inaccurate. However, ‘rumor’ is used numerous times. Peri writes, “The staff of Women Defending Ourselves had finally begun to feel empowered, but it was a passive sort of empowerment, based on whispers and rumor campaigns instead of direct confrontation.” A 25 plus year old rumor campaign is exactly what Nefariousski, as Impact, is doing!

How is this single source claiming rumors thereby reliable? Mother Jones was not a major publication in 1990, especially when publishing admitted rumors and is loaded with misinformation?

Nefariousski-Impact tag team planned to link the Wikipedia ESD page to a derogatory Model Mugging Wikipedia page highlighting a tabloid source written with accusation heading, “controversy”. Impact also wrote a promotional page and pasted it into her Sandbox. They are also getting around Wikipedia rules against self-promotion using Wikipedia search engine ranking by keeping their page in the sandbox status - FIRST PAGE on search results for "Empowerment Self-Defense".

PLEASE CLICK the pdf link as evidence to view images in summary report of her COI campaign promoting Impact Self-Defense - again: http://modelmugging.org/history/impact-self-defense-wikipedia-attack.pdf

Is this "nefarious" behavior? Should she be blocked and all her edits scrutinized? Does Wikipedia see a problem with hypocritical editor(s)?

I had written a response in Model Mugging Talk PRIOR to discovering the ESD page.

We need the Model Mugging site corrected and will also need protection against other Impact organizational associates tag teaming inaccurate edits.

Thank you for your assistance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiipedia-posting (talk • contribs) 03:55, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

12:59:37, 1 October 2015 review of submission by Csinacola


Hi SwisterTwister -

Appreciate your comments, review and encouragement. Have been searching for as many sources as possible on the Perry Rosenthal profile. Can you be more specific as to which citations need additional support? I had thought I had supported them all, but am willing to seek out more (if it's out there!), so any further guidance appreciated.

Thanks. Csinacola (talk) 12:59, 1 October 2015 (UTC)CSinacola[reply]


I simply think it could use any further sources to provide additional support. SwisterTwister talk 23:20, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 23:08:28, 1 October 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Gtownrower23



Hi,

Could you provide more clarity on why the Mercury Capital Advisors page was not approved. It seems like it is notable. The firm was number one in private placements in the first half of 2015, and has been in the top five for private placements in the last 5 years. Other less notable private placement agencies have pages. If you could help it would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.l

Gtownrower23 (talk) 23:08, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Specifically more third-party sources. SwisterTwister talk 23:20, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TwisterSwister,

Thanks for your comments on my page 'Capture Management'. I have made changes and expanded the page but it has not gone live yet. Could have a look at the changes please?

Thanks Alex King-Zhang (talk) 15:47, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

More sources

Hi SwisterTwister I have questions about draft:lynne Reeves Griffin. You stated that the sources were not reliable and I'm just confused as they are almost all articles in major newspapers. Also, you left a comment that the article could use more sources. Was there a section in particular that you would like to see more sources for? And what type of sources if not newspaper articles? Thanks! Goldencam (talk) 21:21, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, SwisterTwister. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Price Overide.
Message added 17:37, 3 October 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-- Sam Sailor Talk! 17:37, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Swister. I hope this finds you well. Would you comment in the AfD, please? -- Sam Sailor Talk! 07:19, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 17:43:33, 3 October 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Furbierules


Hello SwisterTwister! (If I'm not in the right place, please let me know and I'll never show up here again! Should I go to the Tea House instead? This is my first Wiki experience.)

Thank you for reviewing my recent contribution (referenced above). I'm not clear on two points: -- You note that it reads more like a report or essay than an encyclopedic article; what do you mean specifically? ==> Is there somewhere I can look up this distinction? ==> What types of changes would I need to make to render the article acceptable? -- You also encourage me to use secondary, reliable info, using no original research. ==> Nothing that appears in the article is my material, and I include references to approximately 78 distinct, verifiable sources (links are provided), so I'm not sure what to make of that note?

I thank you for any help or guidance that you are able to provide! Furbierules Furbierules (talk) 17:43, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Furbierules (talk) 17:43, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

17:53:01, 3 October 2015 review of submission by Furbierules


Hello again SwsterTwister - Furbie rules again. ;-) Can you tell me if Part I (What is Memory Reconsolidation?) meets the encyclopedic standards? Is it Parts II and III that pose a problem because they contain statements of implication/application? Just trying to see where the problems lie specifically! Thanks again. Furbierules (talk) 17:53, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Furbie The article looks good but it's parts like "What is....?" and "how it works" that are usually not used. There's also currently an article for memory consolidation and the start of this article doesn't seem to differ from that. Simply take your time and know there is no deadline and resubmit when improved. Cheers! SwisterTwister talk 19:15, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

20:20:03, 3 October 2015 review of submission by Furbierules


Thank you so much SwisterTwister. I'm glad the content looks good. I'll see what I can do about those sorts of phrasings, especially in the titles (which seem to be the main problem - is that right?). Any other comments welcome. Cheers to you too! Furbierules (talk) 20:20, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

11:39, 5 October Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Byakuren Kaikan

Hello and thank you for your welcome. I'm a new user and not that used to the world of Wikipedia. My first effort to contribute to the encyclopedia is the article on the Byakuren Kaikan, which now risks to be deleted for reasons I can't say I really agree with. Anyway, I added as much references and sources I can, although most of them are in Japanese. As for today I added more articles I could find on some magazines, please check the discussion page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Byakuren_Kaikan

Also, I would like to know if there is anything else I could do to prevent this page from being deleted as it costed me time and effort to create it and I'd like it to be a reference for anyone looking for information on this style on the web in English.

Thanks a lot for your attention.

Kagite (talk) 11:39, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kagite As many users have said there including myself, the article can be moved to your userspace until it is better and has better sourcing. No worries, take your time and resubmit when better! Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 17:24, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK I will try to improve the page incorporating more sources. I will create a draft page (I think this is the procedure): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:ByakurenKaikan/Kagite Then I will move it back to the original article once finished. Thank you for your support. Kagite (talk) 06:14, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfD closures 2

Hi. Thank you for closing AfDs. When closing as 'Redirect' please remember to include the 'R from X' template on the redirect page so that it adds the correct message and automatically populates the appropriate category. In the case of this page for example , it would be {{R from school}}. I've done it for you this time - take a look. Happy editing! --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:48, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.

Hello. I do not understand where I can leave you a message. so I write here. If I chose the wrong place, please let me know! I just recently on Wikipedia.

Thank you fix my page [Cally-Jo]. I do not quite know very well English. but I tried to write an article to make it clear to all. If you can, you correct my mistakes (speaking, punctuation). I would be very grateful! Thank you for understanding. Nedika (talk) 17:12, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Stevens (musician) - how to link disambiguation

Hello, Thank you for accepting the article [[1]]. Could you advise on how to add this article to the disambiguation page [[2]]?

Also, how could I improve the status of the article? Thanks! (Ongaku ongaku (talk) 21:58, 6 October 2015 (UTC))[reply]

About your censoring of List of devices supported by CyanogenMod

You are not improving Wikipedia by deleting useful content. Shame on you! I will not support Wikipedia economically anymore! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.44.113.82 (talk) 17:27, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you believe that the closer of the deletion discussion interpreted the consensus incorrectly, please see Wikipedia:Deletion review. --Dodi 8238 (talk) 20:24, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request for re-review https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Paloma_Lokus

Hi Swister, kindly requesting your re-review after doubling up on citations and intensely studying notability and golden rule guidelines, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Paloma_Lokus respectfully Reddoggzz (talk) 19:20, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Did you spot...

this fabulous edit by the creator of the Yamaguchi article? Guy (Help!) 11:14, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bruce Judson page

Thank you for patrolling the page on Bruce Judson. I know that autobiography articles are strongly discouraged. However, this may be a case where I meet the notability guidelines. If you agree, can you remove the warnings on the page, and/or review it for a neutral tone?

Notability:

--I have written four books released by major US publishers such as Scribner and HarperCollins, and as indicated in verifiable press articles cited in the Wikipedia article I am a bestselling author.

--In it's first ever list, Advertising Age named me as one of the nation's leading Cybermarketers (verified in Wikipedia article) (i.e. the magazine recognized my influence on the Internet advertising business).

--I was the co-founder of the Yale Journal on Regulation, which has a Wikipedia page.(verified in Wikipedia article)

--I was the co-founder of Pathfinder which has a Wikipedia page.(verified in Wikipedia article)

--The biographer Walter Isaacson credits me with inventing the concept of the banner ad, in two verifiable interviews.(verified in Wikipedia article)

--As indicated in the Wikipedia article, I was the subject of featured (verifiable) profiles or interview articles, in print and online, in the Wall Street Journal, Entrepreneur Magazine (twice), and Advertising Age.(verified in Wikipedia article)

--A bestselling book, "Burn Rate", includes several pages about me in discussing the origins of the Internet advertising business (verified in Wikipedia article with Business Week review of the book, also Google "Bruce Judson, Burn Rate, Michale Wolff and the pages in the book come up).

--There are many more press interviews and quotes from me (including the New York Times front page) which are not in the Wikipedia article but can be verified. (is more necessary?)


Thanks for your help

````Bruce Judson — Preceding unsigned comment added by BruceJudson (talk • contribs) 12:58, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 17:32:03, 9 October 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Csinacola


Hi SwisterTwister, I have added several additional citations/notes for the Perry Rosenthal profile, including references to articles in the Harvard University Gazette, the Boston Business Journal, and Eyeworld, newsletter of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, plus two other references to Dr. Rosenthal's work as a lecture and adviser, including his membership on the editorial board of the Scleral Lens Education Society. I hope this helps. Thanks again for your efforts. CSinacolaCsinacola (talk) 17:32, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Csinacola (talk) 17:32, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2 quick questions (hopefully)

Hi. First, always a pleasure working with you on AfD and AfC. Thanks for all the efforts you put in on both projects. My first question is that I notice you sometimes close AfD's that end up as delete. I've only closed a few, and they've always been keep. If it's a delete determination, I know how to close the discussion, but can I, since I can't delete the article? Second, in one of your comments at AfD I noticed you said you were going back over articles which have been tagged for notability for a while. Is there some type of search that I could use to help with that? I patrol new pages, but don't like deleting them and discouraging new editors (unless it's so obvious). Thanks. Onel5969 TT me 20:52, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Onel5969 Ah yes, I use Special:RandomInCategory particularly searching Orphaned articles, Articles with a promotional tone and Articles lacking sources. You can also range by date for example: Orphaned articles from February 2009. I've heavily been searching and searching through and at first searched more for fabricated articles (see Wikipedia:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia) but now include articles that are questionably to inclusion thus taken to AfD. I have literally filled my notes with articles I have found while binge searching so it would be nice to have some help. As you may notice at some I've nominated, I have found some articles that simply needed to be taken care when started or tagged (see Vantrix) and because of its orphan nature, no one simply ever found it again. Not to mention, because of these orphans, some articles for companies and bands are basically now useless because they may have closed by now and otherwise non-existent so that's especially targeted for AfD. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 20:58, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Brilliant. Thanks. Onel5969 TT me

Liam Payne Draft

Hi. I see that you denied the Liam Payne draft claiming that it does not meet not the notability standards of Wikipedia and I'm just curious as to how that is. I have gone through the standards multiple times and he absolutely meets them. It is mind boggling to me that a member of the biggest band in the world for the last five years, who has completed projects on his own with world famous artists and producers, who is the only member of the band to work as an individual on a world famous media publication, who has more followers on social media than some countries have people, who has the notoriety for a joke tweet to impact a multibillion dollar corporation and I could continue with countless other reasons which were in my draft, which I'm assuming you have not actually properly read, is less notable than half the people that are given individual wikipedia pages. So I ask that you please explain to me how specifically does he not meet the standards because I'm having a really hard time understanding?

Additionally, I know you stated " Comment: Although he seems to have gotten some attention since starting a solo path, he may still be best known for the group and thus there may not be much for a separate article yet. SwisterTwister talk 06:20, 11 October 2015 (UTC)," but then by these standards how is it that any of the other members have solo pages as they too have more notoriety as members of the band, than as individuals.

Beecee14 (talk) 14:18, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted article

Happy to restore Upper Tamakoshi if that makes sense, let me know. (I'm in a Wikimedia confernce at the moment, so haven't looked into it, but saw your note.)--S Philbrick(Talk) 14:47, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sources for Rejected Article

Hello,

You recently rejected a draft for a page on a man named Domenico Tranaso: https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Draft:Domenico_Tranaso&redirect=no

Your reason was that more sources are needed. I found one more source on him, but it does not appear to be related to the event that he is most known for. I'm going to add it anyway. Additionally, there's another potential source (I'm 99% sure that it pertains to him and his attempted takeover of Altamura), however it has to be purchased online in order to be read: http://www.torrossa.it/resources/an/2941719. Would these two sources potentially be enough to warrant a Wikipedia page on him?

ThanksHlt443 (talk) 23:37, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Domenico Tranaso has been accepted

Domenico Tranaso, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 23:44, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SwisterTwister&oldid=685304519"