User talk:McDoobAU93

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by when more than 3 sections are present.

McDoob AU93 is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Orphaned non-free image File:Atlanta United FC Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Atlanta United FC Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:13, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your opinion

Hi there McDoobAU93, could I ask for your opinion at Talk:Hogwarts Express (people mover)#Page name. Thanks, CDRL102 (talk) 18:29, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

STOP

	STOP
	PLZ STOP TAKING OUT MY "MAJOR ATTRACTIONS" EDIT IT IS VEERRRYYYY FRUSTRATING PLZ. And I did base it on fact I went on Google and typed in Busch gardens major attractions and I went on the Busch gardens site and it showed me what the major attraction are Wipout20 (talk) 21:20, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but search engine results are again up to interpretation. If you feel it's important, discuss on the talk page and do NOT add it back to the article until consensus is reached. --McDoob AU93 21:25, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I am the one who wrote "Major Attractions and it is most definitely based on fact and you can go on the Busch Gardens website if u want just like I did so plz just STOP — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wipout20 (talk • contribs) 21:27, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Again, you've been asked and encouraged to visit the article talk page and state your case. Do not attempt to add this back until consensus is reached. --McDoob AU93 21:30, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

McDoobAU93, you too need to mind WP:3RR on this article. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 22:21, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@NeilN you are of course correct. It shouldn't have gone that far. --McDoob AU93 04:27, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Selective reverts

Hello, McDoobAU93! May I ask that when you think an edit is not all you wish for it to be, that you be more selective in what parts of the edit you revert? Instead of reverting an entire edit it may sometimes be better to just revert the part you disagree with. If you do disagree with the entire edit, it may be helpful to others if you motivate each part of the edit that is affected by the revert. Does that seem fair? --Bensin (talk) 20:30, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I was selective in what I reverted. I undid the whole thing as it doesn't belong. For my reasoning why, please see the talk page thread. --McDoob AU93 21:11, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In the cases you revert an edit covering different aspects of the article, could you then please motivate why those aspects should be reverted in your edit summary? --Bensin (talk) 21:43, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not making any more changes to the article. I've made my case in the talk page, and per WP:BURDEN it is time for you to make yours. --McDoob AU93 21:43, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, let's move the discussion regarding the article to Talk:Angry_Birds#Leaking_user_data instead. I noticed that a little more than 1/3 of your last 500 edits were reverts or undos and I just think that the reverts on Angry Birds did not meet your otherwise high standard of edit summaries. So please consider my request to expand your edit summaries when reverting an edit covering unrelated parts of an article. --Bensin (talk) 22:22, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adoption

hi will you adopt me.