Jump to content

Talk:The Sarah Jane Adventures

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Keycard (talk | contribs) at 14:11, 9 August 2006 (Confirmed?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconDoctor Who Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Confirmed?

May I ask what the source of the whole SJI concept is? It is not the newsletter, as that is not published. It is whoever claimed to see the newsletter. Nobody knows whether this is true. Until the BBC says on their website that it is going to happen, I suggest that we say it is unconfirmed (since it is).--Keycard (talk) 07:40, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The newsletter isn't published on the web, but it is a published document, and two independent sources (Outpost Gallifrey and The Stage) have reported on its contents — both quoted the relevant paragraph from Ariel and both are cited on the article page. We can certainly say that it has not been officially confirmed, but I think that callling the production "rumoured" is a bit too strong. Does Ariel have a habit of reporting on programmes that aren't actually being developed? —Josiah Rowe (talkcontribs) 07:48, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've toned the language of the introduction down a bit, and added a note that it hasn't been officially confirmed. —Josiah Rowe (talkcontribs) 07:53, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My point is not that Ariel may be the liar, but that the sources of OG and The Stage may be. Have you seen a copy of Ariel with that article? If not, then you're simply believing what's been said by OG's news page, which is not normally considered a verifiable source for WP's purposes.--Keycard (talk) 14:11, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]