User talk:83.157.66.190

April 2015

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Marvel Contest of Champions with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 17:38, 30 April 2015 (UTC) [reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

The changes were not those in the games. It was just a guy who pleased himself with new characters that doesn't exist

Use an wp:edit summary when you remove content or revert like that. Don't leave the message here. Jim1138 (talk) 17:43, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please say more specific such as "removed addition of non-existent characters" "inaccurate" is often used as an excuse to remove something that someone doesn't like. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 17:48, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You could say the same for the inexact adds. I play this game and you could contact Kabam if you want to check my remove ;)

Edit warring

Welcome!

Hello, 83.157.66.190, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 16:46, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Your recent editing history at Marvel: Contest of Champions shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 16:46, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Answer

@WikiDan61:) Thks. Can someone (you ?) stop user krista031 please ? or make a page protection. I have just asked sources. We are agree on 7 characters in a game. There is questions in the community's game for the others characters. Many people think they do not exist. Me, I do not know. I have a screenshot which can proove the 7 characters exists. For the 4 others, Krista031 could make an insert with a jpg or a link with a kabam forum to proove what he (she?) wrote. I do not ask more. And I'm free to not have an account. I wish that user stay gentlemen and respectful.

The entire article is terribly sourced. I'd be tempted to remove the entire playable/non-playable character table as none of it is verifiable from reliable sources, but I tend to stay away from video game articles because I know little about them and the fan community is very strong-willed. The issue at hand here is the potential violation of Wikipedia's WP:3RR rule; rather than get yourself blocked, just enter into a civil discussion of the matter at Talk:Marvel: Contest of Champions. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:41, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@WikiDan61:) Well, it seems that the user krista031 use another IP and undo the version... To remind facts There are characters in this game. Some characters got 1 star, others got 2 stars, 3 stars, 4 stars and nearly 5 stars 2 stars, 3 stars, 4 stars : no problem on a list 1 star : we are agreed on 7 characters. I made a screenshot of the game. All the player of the game are agree on this list. There is 4 or 5 characters in 1 star that create debate and discussion. Some players thinks they are for the bot, some others says they are playable by humans players. I only ask sources and rigor for these 4 or 5 characters. Krista031 provide a screenshot but we do not know if this is a promotionnal screenshot or her gameplay. There is many promotionnel screenshot and I found one to prove he (her) to be careful if this is not a personnal screenshot. I do not know what can I do more than this. I don't care about being absolutely right. Maybe (s)he's right but I only ask rigor. And I wish not to be insulted by this person. The answer in the talk page contains insults. I try to calm him/her but I did not managed.

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:20, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Hello, I'm K6ka. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Talk:Marvel: Contest of Champions because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --I am k6ka ^{Talk to me!} _{See what I have done} 19:43, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Marvel: Contest of Champions, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Soetermans. T / C 09:44, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Marvel: Contest of Champions. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Soetermans. T / C 18:06, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is impossible to resolve this case if you don't want to talk. The only person who dispute is you. So, you quit or not. If not, you got all power so enjoy. But in a normal way we can't be judge and judged. This is a conflict of interest and in a normal democracy, it won't be accepted. On the internet, I'm suprised that a free thing like wikipedia follow the same rule that our old IRL democracy. Sadly, you will probably give me another WP:something or block me. Have a good day and maybe one day, you will understand what I wanted to say on sociological approache and your dictatorial way of doing things by confusing powers.

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Marvel: Contest of Champions, you may be blocked from editing. Soetermans. T / C 10:30, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Wikipedia is not a democracy. What is "our" democracy? This is the English language Wikipedia, not the English, American or New Zealand Wikipedia. You still fail to see that Wikipedia is not my idea, it's a huge collaborative effort. Just because I tend to follow its guidelines, does not mean I'm the one making them. --Soetermans. T / C 10:38, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

democracy is the transparency of rules. This is what you always said to me for wikipedia. So, it's a democratic way. If it's collaborative, try to be cool with users. And I remind you that you can bu judge and judged. This is a conflict. You should not moderate this page. Think about it. And as I said to you. There are rules and exception to the rules and the guides. This is how the world is built. Sorry bro, you should ask yourself some questions about the conception of the rules.

PS : by the way, the definition of wikipedia is not a democracy is really poor. The vote is not the condition of democracy. You should read Jurgen Habermas before linking this ;) It's really nice but far away from the reality of what is really a democracy. Is China or Russia a democracy because they're voting ? wow...

Democracy is not a "transparency of rules". Collaborative does not mean democratic either. I'm not moderating anything. A link to WP:DEMOCRACY is still a guideline, even if you don't care about guidelines. Maybe you feel that you're being treated unjustly, if that's the case, I'm sorry. I'm not sure if I'm getting through to you, but let me repeat:

I am not the one making the rules on Wikipedia. I can issue you a warning, I cannot block you. I can't protect articles either, all that is done by other editors. If you can't play ball here on Wikipedia, maybe this simply isn't the place for you. Even if you think your sociological approach is a brilliant idea, it still is your idea.

You're right, I am starting to sound like a broken record, because I repeat Wikipedia's guidelines and I honstely don't know what else to say to you. --Soetermans. T / C 13:07, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If democracy is not the transparency of rules, I do not know what can I say to you. Also, if you don't want to see link with collaborative. I regret one thing. You did a good job when you rewrite the page, except this list of characters. Many users reverts you and it's going again and again on the same way. I explain why so many users revert. And you're still linking to the guide, which I said it's not the good case or an exception. You're not agree, fine. You do what you want.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.