Jump to content

Talk:Melipona bicolor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Khan.nadia (talk | contribs) at 20:44, 20 October 2015 (Update Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/Washington_University_in_St_Louis/Behavioral_Ecology,_Biology_472_(Fall_2015) assignment details). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconArticles for creation Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Note icon
This article was accepted from this draft on 27 September 2015 by reviewer Sulfurboy (talk · contribs).
WikiProject iconBiology Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconMelipona bicolor is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia. Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconInsects Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Courtney.cleveland, Cratermann.


This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Courtney.cleveland, Cratermann. This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Courtney.cleveland, Cratermann.


Comments 10/29

I added this page to the category Hymenoptera of South America and adjusted the headings to be consistent across the page and the rest of Wikipedia.

The nest section is very thorough, as well as the mating section, and overall your article gives a clear idea of this species. I like how you found a map and good photo for the organism. The text was clear and readable. I would recommend adding to the description and identification. Right now it is not very specific and it’s also unbalanced. Courtney.cleveland (talk) 22:10, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WashU Student Review

I made very minor changes to the grammar and and sentence structure of the introduction and taxonomy paragraph. Overall, however, the introduction was solid and included an interesting fact that made me want to read more.I added a second paragraph to the Communication section. I found an article discussing the use of sound frequency to recruit members of foraging parties towards high-quality food sources. I also added a citation and added more examples in the Predator section. The paragraph was formerly missing any citations.

The page covers a wide variety of important topics, though some of them are relatively short. I would work on expanding those that only have one or two sentences. cratermann (talk) 22:36, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

This article was overall extremely comprehensive and covered an array of subjects regarding the Melipona bicolor species. In order to improve it, I increased the number of headings, separating subjects that seemed to be too vague into smaller, more specific, subsections. For example, I created a “Nest Interior” subsection, as there is a solid paragraph of information solely on the inside of the M. bicolor nest. Furthermore, the communication heading could be broken down into different forms of communication (chemical and sound) to make the sections more specific in their information. I also increased the number of hyperlinks within the article to connect it further to other Wikipedia articles. Other than these more significant formatting changes, I edited some sentence structures and corrected spelling errors/typos. mira.tbaum (talk) 22:54, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]