Talk:WikiProject
Wikipedia Start‑class High‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Websites: Computing Start‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||||||
|
Additional sources
"Cross-cutting WikiProjects are not just places to do types of work you enjoy, but they're also excellent places to discuss the finer nuances of article construction and how to get the most out of Wikipedia's powerful software tools".[1]
"WikiProjects are platforms for discussion about general issues, rather than cooperation and coordination centres".[2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by BD2412 (talk • contribs) 15:53, 10 August 2015
References
- ^ John Broughton, Wikipedia: The Missing Manual (2008), p. 165-175.
- ^ Jerzy Kociatkiewicz, Monika Kostera, Liquid Organization: Zygmunt Bauman and Organization Theory (2014).
Capitalization
This article is titled WikiProject, but variously uses that capitalization and "Wikiproject", with the lede suggesting that the former is correct. Usage in sources appears to be mixed. I would think "WikiProject" would be correct, especially since it's so dominant here. And we invented WikiProjects, didn't we? --BDD (talk) 13:54, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- I tend to agree, "WikiProject". By the way, there is more information that can be cited from Wikipedia: The Missing Manual: The Missing Manual. bd2412 T 15:40, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
I just created a new article Legacy House
- Start-Class Wikipedia articles
- High-importance Wikipedia articles
- WikiProject Wikipedia articles
- Start-Class Websites articles
- Mid-importance Websites articles
- Start-Class Websites articles of Mid-importance
- Start-Class Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Websites articles