User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom
HURRY, HURRY, HURRY!
Step right up and see a treasury of pinnipeds right before your very eyes!
The next act in only 4 days and 10 edits.
The most ethical show in the big top!
This is TheRedPenOfDoom's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20Auto-archiving period: 10 days |
Index
|
||||||||||||||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
And there is also This archive
Edit Request
I think the User:Rishika.dhanawade has added some unnecessary content through https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Karan_Singh_Grover&diff=683440263&oldid=682956824 to Karan Singh Grover. Please can you remove it. Regards., Digvijay411 (talk) 2:54, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
Edit request
Hello!!!!! TheRedPenOfDoom I have made some recent edits to Hera Pheri 3 added and removed some content.There was a lot of irrelevant content in the article. I tried to make some changes as they are being verified by well known bollywood celebrity news website(Pinkvilla and others). After your edit I am guessing you made something wrong and deleted some important lines and stories. Please revert it to it's earlier state. Regards, Jashafi24 (talk) 8:17, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Aahil Raza Ibrahim=
I have again opened the article Aahil Raza Ibrahim as now it has been improved and provided reliable references from newspapers User:Rishika.dhanawade — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rishika.dhanawade (talk • contribs)
link deletion reasoning
Back in 2013 you deleted several external links from the Sutro Baths page...
One of those links was to this pages: http://www.cliffhouseproject.com/environs/sutrobaths/sutro_baths.htm
This is a site I maintain. This page contains more Sutro Baths historical photographs than you will find anywhere, many from my own collection. There are no ads or malicious content. The national park service links to my website for historical information. What was the purpose of your deletion?
gary — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.84.116.86 (talk • contribs)
Edit request
Hello!!! TheRedPenOfDoom I have made some recent edits to Karanvir Bohra added and removed some content.Some user thinks that there is lot of irrelevant content in the article. Please can you help improving it.Please can you remove the data you feel is irrelevant. Regards, Rishika.dhanawade (talk) 5:21, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Edit Request
Hello!!! TheRedPenOfDoom, Thank you for fullfilling my request and improving the article Karanvir Bohra. I also want to make a request to you to remove all the unnecessary trivia from the page Karan Singh Grover.It has too much of unnecessary stuff in the personal life section. Even in the career section things such as the actor being mobbed in public places and being appreciated by costars and colleagues have been added which I feel is inappropriate to be added over there. I had tried removing the content some time ago. But there is some user Durr-e-shehwar who again reverts my edits.Please can you take some steps against improvement of the article.
Regards,
Rishika.dhanawade (talk) 4:53, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Warning2
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Forrester Research
I see you removed a reference to Forrester Research. Isn't it encyclopedic?NSpehler (talk) 2:32, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Poor ref on DeD
Pen, i clearly understood your point i always have, that's why i never interrupt on the edits of other editors you undid. But in my case i am confident that my content is true and authentic, and is written in a way it should be written. And your concern with the sources, i am removing as less important references as i can. I already deleted refrences that were twice used or according to you is not ok. Tell me you remove my critical reception part, where as strong sources were presented such as Dawn News and Aaaj News, in rating section i used official and authentic Broadcasters' Audience Research Board references and BizAsia an Indian online rating channel for UKs programming. Tell me are these invalid or Crap sources?.
I am not user Sammy.joseph who is new to Wikipedia, i have made series of an article and they are believed to be good and never question. In Pakistan Television Industry media sources are very few who are acclaimed but that doesn't mean they are crap. No matter how much you referred me to Wikipedia policies or rules, i know them very well. I am asking you to believe in my edits and i will try to clean as much CRAP as possible and actually i always have. Fushan007 Talk 9:244, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
GA nominee
Hai, I have nominated the film article Loham for GA-status. Which is currently on "Hold on" time and there are some corrections to be done before it ends. Mainly copy editing for grammer and writting style. For making it a good article there are some suggestions referred in Talk:Loham. I invite you to make your contributions to it. Charles Turing (talk) 08:35, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Mistake?
Hi RP, you thanked me for my reversion, but then reverted me. Mistake? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:50, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
- @Cyphoidbomb: whoah! thanks for catching that. the thank you was intended, the other was a completely wrong click. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 01:53, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
- Editing on my tablet has occasionally yielded unfortunate rollbacks. I understand completely. :) Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:54, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Bidlo-Not Pollock.jpg
Thanks for your message, but you are mistaken to assert that the image is a copyright violation eligible for speedy deletion under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion. The image in question has been in place in the article, with a proper and valid fair use licence, since July 2007.
Your recent edits have removed the image from the article which means it is now a candidate for speedy deletion under section F12 of the criteria for speedy deletion. I know not all agree with the fair use doctrine, but I was active during 2006-2008 when the issue was discussed at length on WP and we settled on such use under strict criteria. I believe that the image is a good candidate for use in the article to enhance the subject matter and assist the reader's understanding of Bidlo as an "appropriationist" artist. Therefore, I am considering adding it, or others, back under a fair use licence before the image gets speedied.
Please take a little more time to consider all the factors involved and do not mistakenly place boilerplate template messages on my talk page which give the impression that I'm engaged in copyright violations. --Cactus.man ✍ 18:31, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
why did you delete image
it said you deleted an image from the page harley huke for copyright.
i own the copywritght you fuck up. why you deleting shit.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lux44-musicpages (talk • contribs)
Ken Ham
I think the consensus is heading towards retaining the old wording (i.e. with "prove", but not "wrong"). But we might need the discussion formally closed. StAnselm (talk) 20:09, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
- I have gone ahead and closed the discussion and restored the word "prove". StAnselm (talk) 20:18, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
A cup of tea for you!
With this ever dramatic world including WikiDrama, here's a cup of tea to alleviate your day! This e-tea's remains have been e-composted SwisterTwister talk 03:52, 23 October 2015 (UTC) |
Check the lead section of this film article Ennu Ninte Moideen.--49.15.129.34 (talk) 11:57, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Rishabha
Hello, I am interested in improving the page, Rishabha. In august, you added the "tone" tag to the page. Can your point out the specific problems which can be fixed, so as to improve the page. Thanks in advance. Nimit (talk) 17:51, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
HUM TV
Why did you add a source section? No other wiki page has that, it's got nothing to do with it - the information provided on that page is all true. You can search it on the internet if you wish. Please stop reverting it. If you want to remove the timings section, feel free to do that, but leave the rest and stop shoving the info into all one table which makes it harder for the reader. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sulaiman Ali (talk • contribs) 13:46, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Republic of Heaven
Hello, I 'thanked' you when you put a 'delete' tag on 'Republic of Heaven', and note your 'pruning' of the OR. There are a couple of pages that the little information left could go. 'Republic of Heaven' is already in Locations_in_His_Dark_Materials#Republic_of_Heaven and could otherwise go into His_Dark_Materials#Terminology_used_in_the_books. My memory of the books was that the 'Republic of Heaven' was a notional place even within the books, the 'locations' page suggests otherwise.
My own experience of dealing with His Dark Materials pages, is that there was an awful lot of 'fan-sitey' pages created a few years ago, and the rest of us are left to clear up the mess therafter.
Are you going to propose this for deletion, as I think there is little prospect of it being save-able as it is or was? Pincrete (talk) 20:41, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
help desk
I responded there. Please reply there and my talk page. Thank you! --74.130.133.1 (talk) 21:04, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
again
Please reply at the help desk. --74.130.133.1 (talk) 21:15, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
thanks
for the help --74.130.133.1 (talk) 21:54, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
IP Address 117.199.165.20 or its variants indulging in digital vandalism on wiki pages of Pakistani dramas
The user is never signed in, but the user(s) end up changing the contents of the pages at large. The IP addresses are different, but it is possible that they hop a lot, but the MO is the same.
- Zindagi Gulzar Hai - https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Zindagi_Gulzar_Hai&type=revision&diff=687613210&oldid=687608140 (Last edit before your edit)
- Humsafar - https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Humsafar&type=revision&diff=687606953&oldid=686136517 (Last edit before your edit)
- Jal Pari (TV series)- https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Jal_Pari_%28TV_series%29&type=revision&diff=687540951&oldid=685867657
- Talkhiyaan - https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talkhiyaan&type=revision&diff=678387831&oldid=672980197
There are others and I will try to find them. Hopefully this is a good start. Manoflogan (talk) 07:02, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Did you see anything to establish the name change from Mood 92.0 FM to simply Mood FM? All the initial research I see affirms the existing name, and that the change to Mood FM is not supported by any reliable sources, and even their parent company still list them under the longer name. My thoughts are to revert back to Mood 92.0 FM until reliable sources are found. Since you've done some editing here, I was wondering about your thoughts. Tiggerjay (talk) 15:27, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Requesting review for articles created by one User
I just recently noticed lot of articles created by a user Rajeshbieee, even without any valid references and all. So I'm requesting to review the articles created by this user and requesting to delete all the hoax articles from Wikipedia. I found that you always cleanup articles if there's no reference and all. Here's the list of articles created by Rajeshbieee, you can see somany articles even without any references. [1] 117.245.8.98 (talk) 18:20, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Category syntax
I assumed {{Category:American male authors}} was a typo so I silently changed it [1] but I see you have restored it [2]. Categories use square brackets. See Help:Category. I know users work with different things and have different knowledge but I'm curious. After 132,247 edits, do you actually think categories use curly brackets? PrimeHunter (talk) 19:05, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Edit Review
I APOLOGIZE for offending your Group's processes on Teahouse several weeks ago. I was advised to go to the Teahouse from the Wikimedia Support Team, and I saw that I misunderstood the angle of approach and the platform for the Teahouse. All I can do is apologize for my error.
Please realize I do not understand the Wikipedia maze and am a rookie at this. We never asked to be on Wikipedia. The history shows a competitor putting us there and then tried to say the name was changed.
Everything I listed on the last change is in print; the changes on the first sentence is from the Peri article; “rumor campaign” is in the article as I listed the page and location. My comments on the Talk page were based on the article and the prior comments, which is why I listed the page locations.
Would you kindly repost my edit as it is directly from the Peri source?
Thank you for your understanding at my learning a new language and thank you for your assistance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiipedia-posting (talk • contribs) 19:11, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
- @Wikiipedia-posting: I dont have time or connection speed right now to look into this, but I have asked for some experienced users to get involved. Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Potential_issues_at_Model_Mugging. I will check back later. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 19:21, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Thank you! Sorry to add this - I did reach out to another editor (BU Rob13) for posting review because he had posted in the past on the page history, but I did not see anything for at least a couple of weeks and I then noticed our edit comments were deleted from his page. This is why I made the change. If I can go through you or someone you can recommend would be very helpful. Again, thank you and I will wait your team's reassessment! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiipedia-posting (talk • contribs) 19:41, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Adding notability
Hello! I am contacting you regarding this webpage: Airy_(software) Since the time you placed your note about “notability guidelines for products and services” I have added more external resources and some citations. The aim of this page is to describe the app which is listed here: Comparison_of_YouTube_downloaders. It was created taking into account webpages of another apps of such kind. Could you please reconsider your remark or advise me what changes should be made?MargoRaynolds (talk) 10:22, 28 October 2015 (UTC)