Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 November 18

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AnomieBOT (talk | contribs) at 05:06, 21 November 2015 ((BOT) Close discussions for deleted/nonexistent templates: "Cricket templates for speedy deletion". Errors? User:AnomieBOT/shutoff/TFDClerk). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

November 18

WP:LISTCRUFT falling into the category of WP:OR. A major concern is that the template criterium is too vague and might in theory include an indefinite amount of people, since new spiritual leaders (the "revered personalities") pop up continuously. HyperGaruda (talk) 19:59, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

better to just use the list article and the category. we don't need a navbox as well. Frietjes (talk) 15:26, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or list per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:59, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Cabinet of Narendra Modi with Template:Modi.
I have created the new template, covering all the articles of Narendra Modi, except his ministry, since I think it would be better to merge the existing template itself. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 11:22, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cricket templates for speedy deletion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete for multiple reasons:

AnomieBOT 05:06, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In spite of the consensus being Delete all in TFD, they are not deleted yet. Hence, nominating again for speedy delete. Chris8924 (talk) 08:39, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template used in only one article and also serves no navigational purpose. One can simply link to the album article for info about the album. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 02:35, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]