User talk:Khaldei
Hello Khaldei and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.
Here are some tips to help you get started:
- To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).
- Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
- If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
- Follow the Wikipedia:Simplified Ruleset
- Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
- Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
- Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!
Good luck!
TNG episodes
[edit]Hello Khaldei,
I noticed you added links to the second show of some two-part Star Trek: TNG episodes.
A while ago on Talk:List of Star Trek TNG episodes, there was a discussion about this. We ended up thinking that both shows in two-part episodes could have just one article and thus that links to the second shows weren't necessary. If you disagree, please let me know.
Thanks,
Acegikmo1 15:15, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply.
- I think the reference could simply link to the episode as a whole (instead of I or II specifically). I'll revert the episode list to the earlier version.
- I see you've made several good contributions to Star Trek related articles. Please keep up the good work.
- Acegikmo1 15:30, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Re: Emily Dickinson
[edit]Hi. Nice work on the index system. Congrats.
Anyway, I'm using the three volume The Poems of Emily Dickinson compiled by R.W. Franklin (ISBN 0-674-67622-X). I changed the title links to coincide with the first variation and included every variation on the same page (i.e. Sic transit gloria mundi and "Sic transit gloria mundi,"). I don't think these are standardized in any formal way (i.e. no "correct" title considering that there are other more significant variations of the first lines), so I'm open to any suggestions. Tae W. Son 22:14, 4 Jan 2005 (UTC)
I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Birthing chamber (Benzite), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. I've already merged the entire contents of this stub into the article Benzite. - Fayenatic london (talk) 19:49, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Benzite, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Addhoc 16:15, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Crystalline Entity
[edit]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Crystalline Entity, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Crystalline Entity. Ejfetters 06:41, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Mot (Star Trek)
[edit]A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mot (Star Trek), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Mot (Star Trek). Ejfetters 08:18, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Wilfred Owens
[edit]Hi, there is a query about a work you contributed to Wikisource. Could you take a look at s:Talk:Spring Offensive please, and if you can recall, note there which edition you contributed. John Vandenberg (talk) 03:11, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)