Jump to content

User talk:Paolowalter

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 178.94.220.190 (talk) at 18:39, 23 November 2015 (→Hama/Aleppo/Dara/Homs/Latakia provinces and East Ghouta updates). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Your recent edits

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:25, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Source

You must specify the source when editing a card or you can be charged with vandalism. But that would this not have happened you must use reliable sources for editing and also not use doubtful and unreliable sources. Hanibal911 (talk) 09:37, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to edit using the not reliable sources, I will notify administrators about your actions. Such actions are vandalism. Hanibal911 (talk) 17:03, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You must understand that we are not using Syrian documents for editing map because this source is not a reliable. Hanibal911 (talk) 17:42, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry but yalla souriya it is blog and therefore can not used as a source. This is the rule in Wikipedia.Wikipedia:Blogs We can only use blogs the news agencies. Here is an example Al Jazeera Live_BlogNOW News BlogNEWS Blogs Hanibal911 (talk) 20:51, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And no need to use to edit such sources as yalla souriya because has repeatedly was proved that this source is not reliable. And sometimes some editors start using it in order that to display the rebels advances and map turns into trash. Hanibal911 (talk) 21:00, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I again ask you not to use source Syrian documents because data from this source not once admitted unreliable and inaccurate. Hanibal911 (talk) 22:10, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

We do not use data from Facebook for editing the map. I recommend you to use data directly from the SOHR website. Hanibal911 (talk) 18:29, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Syrian civil war sanctions notice

As a result of a community decision, broad editing restrictions apply to all pages broadly related to the Syrian Civil War. These sanctions are described at Talk:Syrian Civil War/General sanctions and a brief summary is included below:
Sanctions may only be imposed after the user is notified sanctions are in effect. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions.

This notice is effective only if given by an uninvolved administrator and logged at Talk:Syrian civil war/General sanctions#Log of notifications.

--Bbb23 (talk) 23:39, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Facebook aint a reliable source, review WP rules

Facebook cannot be used in the majority of times as a source per WP:FACEBOOK, so please abstain to use it and try to use other type of sources (newspaper articles, websites, journalistic videos, etc...). Regards,--HCPUNXKID 15:21, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ayn al-Tinah in Qalamoun

Why you changed the village Ayn al-Tinah in Qalamoun using source that said about a village in Quneitra. Your actions are this is vandalism, and if you continue edit without a reliable source confirming your editings I'll have to notify administrators. Hanibal911 (talk) 17:26, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shayzar

Why did you add village of Shayzar but without specifying the source on basis of which you added this village. But you can specify it on the talk page. Hanibal911 (talk) 20:44, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Self-revert the kasab change

The article clearly states,that rebels capture the border crossing,so self-revert it.Alhanuty (talk) 19:09, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kesab

Correct your mistake because of your edit on the map disappeared the city Kesab.her Hanibal911 (talk) 21:21, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your question.

In order to revert the map, you go down to a section that says the file is from the wikimedia commons and click on the words that say "description page there". Then scroll down and you will find a history of the map. You will notice there is a revert button next to each previous version of the map. Simply find the version you want, and click revert. Now as for placing a new map in place of the old one, I was ironically going to message you for information on how to do so. Maybe ask Hannibal and see if he knows. If you do find out how from him, please tell me.

Thank You Dr Marmilade (talk) 22:03, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea. EkoGraf (talk) 22:16, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Inkhil

Pro government source who used the editor Sopher for editing the city of Inkhil did not said that the city is under the control of the opposition and the second source which he used is pro opposition source and cant be used to display the rebels advances. So I Think that us again should be noted the city Inkhil as contested. So I am grateful to you for what you corrected this inaccuracy because if I did it I break the rules of 1RR and Sopher already warned me about it.her Because I already tried to fix this but another editor revert my editing. Hanibal911 (talk) 19:28, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tal Malah

SOHR later also said that the rebels were just trying to capture the village of Tal Malah but does not say that they captured her.source Hanibal911 (talk) 08:58, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Self-revert your edit

You reverted without a source,so self revert yourself.Alhanuty (talk) 19:46, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Template:Syrian Civil War detailed map

See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Alhanuty reported by User:Hanibal911 (Result: Warned Alhanuty and Paolowalter). You have been warned for violating the WP:1RR restriction on pages relating to the Syrian Civil War. It is normal to issue blocks for 1RR violations. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:38, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Think first, then edit

Ok, I'll try not to be rude. First, Al-Shula must be black, as the newer sources we have (pro-opp maps from 31 May & 1 June) say so. Newer sources are above older ones, most if the map you use didnt even have the town on it. And when you add towns, do the effort of reviewing if that town is already on the map, as it happened with Jubb al-Abyad.--HCPUNXKID 21:55, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

. Template:Syrian Civil War detailed map

Here is the map from the pro opposition source that displays the situation in Syria on the beginning of June! Data on this map confirms Joshua Landis renowned expert but also a supporter of the Syrian opposition. I think all the supporters of the rebels will not challenge this data because they themselves have repeatedly stated that he prominent expert on Syria. Hanibal911 (talk) 21:02, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

South Aleppo countryside

I applied several changes pro-opp from pro-gov map situation in South Aleppo countryside [1]. I found also [2], but it is in arab (which I cannot read); translated with google I got something like

Simplified unit element of the Syrian Arab Army, with the support of the local defense forces control over the missile base in the area of ​​Azzan , and villages Abtin and draw wormwood and Kvrobeid Plus and south of Aleppo up to the outskirts of the area west of Aleppo Zorba .

A military source said the TV news that the control elements of the Syrian Arab Army came to complement the military operation that began two days ago , where lies the importance of the region being overseen most of the villages in the southern and western Alrevi .

"After control of the southern villages , especially air defense base and Plus , the army has cut supply routes for the gunmen Alrevi between the southern and western , as it became Aleppo - Damascus under the main goal mechanisms ."

A possible interpretation is that Arbin and the neighbouring bunker (http://wikimapia.org/#lang=it&lat=36.071580&lon=37.119026&z=12&m=b) is under SAA control. Can somebody help in the translation? And the source is reliable? Paolowalter (talk) 21:12, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for violating WP:1RR at Template:Syrian Civil War detailed map per WP:SCWGS. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Bbb23 (talk) 22:10, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rumeilan oil fields

Rumeilan oil fields in Hasakah province still submit to the control of the Kurdish forces of YPG and pro-regime forces in the area. But i cant find it is oil field on the map maybe you can help me find him and i marked this oil field to the map. This confirmed the pro opposition source. source Hanibal911 (talk) 07:59, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I found an oil depot in http://wikimapia.org/#lang=it&lat=37.000359&lon=42.071457&z=11&m=b and Rumaylan in http://wikimapia.org/#lang=it&lat=37.008584&lon=41.953354&z=13&m=b, which is already on the map. I'll loe for more precise infos. Paolowalter (talk) 09:04, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jalma and tal malh

sohr is reporting clashes in the vincity of the villages,and sohr is a very reliable,source

https://www.facebook.com/syriahroe/posts/561469397294736

https://www.facebook.com/syriahroe/posts/561744473933895

i would advise to put them back rebel-held with a red ring around them.Alhanuty (talk) 18:13, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Khan Touman

In accordance with the data from the pro opposition source the city of Khan Touman must be marked how contested. www.syriadirect.org/rss/1481-syria-direct-news-update-8-6-2014 Hanibal911 (talk) 08:18, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Arzeh and al-Sheyha in Hama

Editor Alhanuty noted the villages Arzeh and al-Sheyha under rebel control on based opposition source ISW which said that rebels captured these villages in 31 July but in same day other pro opposition source noted these villages under army control. You can help me convince Alhanuty that I was right when I marked these villages under control of rmy and that ISW it is source which loyal to Syrian rebels. Hanibal911 (talk) 09:21, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Aleppo

I dont remember exactly but it was a reliable source.map Also here pro opposition source said that rebel forces of al-Mujahideen Army targeted pro-Assad forces in Kallaseh neighbourhood in the city of Aleppo, using heavy artillery.Ara News Hanibal911 (talk) 19:41, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Editor Moester101 completely ignored all information from reliable sources that confirmed that the army controls the Haydarya in the eastern part of Aleppo but for some reason when an anonymous editor gave him the data from the pro opposition source which alleged that the rebels captured the research center, he immediately changed it on the map. Editor Moester in mostly make editing in favor of the rebels and thus it is not a neutral editor. Hanibal911 (talk) 11:10, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

villages in Hasakah

I need your help! The actions of editor Roboskiye it is vandalism. He changed the status of the 5 villages in the Hasakah province with the contested between Kurds and Isalmic State to under conrol by YPG simply because it is he so decided.here Here is his argument in favor of this decision: No evidence of fighting for a long time. But how I know this not sufficient base for such editing. Hanibal911 (talk) 08:25, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Arzeh

Al-masdar is a biased source similiar to SANA and this is refuted further by the clashes occuring in Qohama,so Self-revert and stop this Vandalism.Alhanuty (talk) 15:33, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Homs province

Now area which located villages al-Shandakhia, Unq al-Hawa, Rahhoum under army controll per pro opp source but editor Boredwhytekid revert my editing her although earlier to according data from the pro government map was changed status of several villages in the north of Hama province.here And then he did not mind. This is a double standard because it means we can edit in favor by rebels based the pro government map but we cant edit in favor by Syrian army on based data from pro opposition map. Hanibal911 (talk) 19:40, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable source?

How do you think we can use this map to edit the map. Hanibal911 (talk) 19:42, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Taiba al-Emam

Partially pro opposition source SOHR only reported that helicopters dropped explosive barrels on Taiba al-Emam here and not said about clashes in this city. And also in same day SOHR also reported that helicopters dropped barrel bombs onto areas in the south of Tebet al Imam town.here I think that this is not enough to change the city on the contested need more data. To change such strategically important city in the contested need more data and no one of the reliable sources did not confirm that clashes in the city . How you think? Hanibal911 (talk) 19:20, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In the end,it was discovered that Taybat Al-Emam was actually under rebel control,when the regime regained it,but you refused to show,and that is an inaccuracy.Alhanuty (talk) 15:14, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jisr Shugur

Maybe you were right in the article that says that the city was captured was a mistake. Because this article in other sources does not speak about it.The Huffington PostThe Associated PressThe Boston GlobeFox News Maybe it's worth marked it to contested and try find more information about the situation in the city. Also pro opposition source on 1 September showed this city under control by Syrian troops.here Hanibal911 (talk) 08:30, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Module:Syrian Civil War detailed map - 1RR

Just a warning this time as it's a tad stale. You broke 1RR with these two edits 1 then 2. Please be more careful in the future. Thank you, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:36, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SOHR

Now it became absolutely clear that SOHR it is biased pro opposition source and we can use him to show rebel advances. Read this article:SOHR Even other pro opposition sources acknowledge it. Pro opposition source Syria Direct clear said that SOHR it is the pro-opposition monitoring group Syrian Observatory for Human Rights. www.syriadirect.org/rss/1552-syria-direct-news-update-9-10-14 Hanibal911 (talk) 09:20, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lajat Region

the article clearly states the area of Lajat, a rebel stronghold in south-west Dera’a province,meaning that the area and its vllages are under rebel control and stop reverting this,like it was very fine to add tens of loyalist villages in homs and hama and daraa itself,but it is like not allowed for rebel-held villages,even Hannibal is accepting it,stop stop reverting and vandalism.Alhanuty (talk) 15:13, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.--Alhanuty Alhanuty (talk) 18:58, 14 September 2014 (UTC).[reply]

September 2014

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring and contravening WP:1RR, as you did at Module:Syrian Civil War detailed map. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.   Wifione Message 18:59, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dots on Damascus map

Hi!. Ive removed that dots from Damascus map following the rules agreed by editors here, but Alhanuty (what a surprise!) reverted my edit. Could u revert his edit in order to not make me break the 24 hour rule, please?. Regards,--HCPUNXKID 23:34, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

the edit has been agreed on,and i recomment to add those towns to the reef dimashq map,and alot,alots of evidence has been brought for it.Alhanuty (talk) 06:14, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wadi Barada

NW area in Wadi Barada valley under control by army but rebels still present in NE area in Wadi Barada valley this confirmed the pro opposition source.here Hanibal911 (talk) 14:56, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Masdar is not a reliable source. It has no independent review, is not reputable or renown for facts, and focuses only on regime gains.

I will only not-revert masdar if sources of similar quality - such as etilaf, zamanaswl ect, are used too. Zenithfel (talk) 17:03, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked from editing

To enforce an community sanction, and for violating the one revert rule (1 & 2) at Module:Syrian Civil War detailed map per WP:GS/SCW,
you have been blocked from editing for one week. You are welcome to make useful contributions once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks and then appeal your block using the instructions there.

Reminder to administrators: Community sanctions are enacted by the consensus of the community. You must either discuss this block with the blocking administrator and receive their approval, or receive consensus at a community noticeboard before reversing this block.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:01, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked from editing

To enforce a community sanction, and for violating the one revert rule at Module:Syrian Civil War detailed map per WP:GS/SCW,
you have been blocked from editing for two weeks. You are welcome to make useful contributions once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks and then appeal your block using the instructions there. Wifione Message

Reminder to administrators: Community sanctions are enacted by the consensus of the community. You must either discuss this block with the blocking administrator and receive their approval, or receive consensus at a community noticeboard before reversing this block.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Paolowalter (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No reason to block my account. That was triggered by user Alhanuty, who is a known vandal. It has made large number of contributions, all in favour of rebels usually based on questionable or biased source, often distorting the evidence. I posted two different sources supporting my changes and he continued to ignore them. On my side I post regularly both pro rebels and pro government edits. His modification to Sheick Miskin https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Cities_and_towns_during_the_Syrian_Civil_War#Al-Shaykh_Miskin were not discussed between editors and clearly unjustified. What was I supposed to do? Leave false infos on the page?

Decline reason:

This is a content dispute, not vandalism. I'm concerned that despite several recent blocks, you do not seem to understand the difference. Kuru (talk) 21:25, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Mashara

Here new map from the pro-government source dated of 10 February which showed that village of Mashara still under control by rebels. So I recommend you revert your edit.here Hanibal911 (talk) 21:46, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

al-Habbariyah

I have already added this village.here Why you add on map another one village al-Habbariyah. Hanibal911 (talk) 22:33, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Personal Attack

you have launched a personal attack on me,if you don't apologize for that personal attack,i will report you to an admin.Alhanuty (talk) 00:18, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tall Salmu

Let's not break the rules of editing! So if you do not have confirmations from a neutral or pro opposition source that the village Tall Salmu contested I propose you simply revert your editing since we cant use the pro government sources to display the advances of the army. Hanibal911 (talk) 07:54, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kafr Nasej

how is the regime fighting in the town,if the regime is bombing it,also Kafr Nasej is deep in rebel territory.Alhanuty (talk) 18:29, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bidayah

You made a mistake when marked as under control by YPG the village of Bidayah. Because SOHR said about village of Bayadiyah Correct this mistake. Hanibal911 (talk) 20:33, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Latakia

Leith Abo Fadel confirmed the edits https://twitter.com/VivaRevolt/status/587650786416537600.Alhanuty (talk) 16:49, 13 April 2015 (UTC) Hannibal,Leith Abo Fadel confirmed it,so just admit it,and stop accusing me with Vandalism,i edited based upon al-masdar and its editor in chief leith abou fadel.Alhanuty (talk) 16:50, 13 April 2015 (UTC) https://twitter.com/leithfadel/status/587655276368625664 https://twitter.com/leithfadel/status/587655710508523520 .Alhanuty (talk) 16:51, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jubb al Ahmar

I earlier today add Jubb al Ahmar.here Also pro opposition and pro government sources confirmed that Al-Huriyahhere under control by rebels.here So that you need fix your mistakes. Hanibal911 (talk) 16:43, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why you mark as contested village Huriyah in Idlib you was need mark as contested village Al Huriyah in Quneitra. Hanibal911 (talk) 11:42, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Why you marked Tall Waset as under control by rebels?here Hanibal911 (talk) 07:04, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A mistype, sorry. The page was not updating properly and I did not see the maistake.Paolowalter (talk) 08:11, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I corrected this mistake! Hanibal911 (talk) 08:25, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page etiquette: indentation

Hello! Thanks for your contributions at Talk:Cities and towns during the Syrian Civil War. A quick request: when responding to a post, please indent your comment with a colon (:), so that it is easy to differentiate one comment from the next. Wikipedia's talk page guidelines on the subject are at Help:Using talk pages#Indentation.

Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks! Magog the Ogre (t • c) 22:02, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Aleppo Military Research Center

the Research center is rebel-held via all sources posted,why did you put it contested.Alhanuty (talk) 21:40, 8 July 2015 (UTC) All sources used are pro-gov,pro-gov sources can't be used for Pro-Gov edits,Self-Revert.Alhanuty (talk) 22:18, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Cities and towns during the Syrian Civil War". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 18 July 2015.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 04:47, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Cities and towns in the war in Iraq and the Levant". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 19 July 2015.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 02:57, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning Cities and towns in the war in Iraq and the Levant, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 20:25, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

Marj al-Zohur

Assad forces take Marj al-Zohur. pro FSA source [3][4] + map [5] SambucaHOHOHO (talk) 09:26, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rebels source: Regime captured Frikka - Marj al-Zuhour - Tell A'war and advancing to Tell Hamakah.[6]
I see that you edited map in Hama/Idlib area so if you do not mind I will send you the data about the situation in this area. I still do not edit because not quite figured out how need do it. SambucaHOHOHO (talk) 15:48, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tall Moramad

Source said about city of Tayr Ma’lah http://wikimapia.org/#lang=en&lat=34.778280&lon=36.710472&z=13&m=b&show=/6991897/Ter-Maela&search=Homs near Al Dar Al Kabirah to north-west of Homs but not about city Tall Moramad to North-East of Homs in area which is under SAA. this confirmed pro SAA https://twitter.com/PetoLucem/status/654565310708756480 and Anti-SAA http://archicivilians.com/2015/10/17/map-the-military-situation-in-north-of-homs-syria-october-17-2015/ sources. So you must marked Tall Moramad agains under SAA. 46.200.207.127 (talk) 12:28, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why DaJesuZ without sources marked under FSA villages Kafr Dalbah and Balas(as military obgect) but Kafr Dalbah(under SAA) and Balas(contested). He broke the rules of editing. 46.200.207.127 (talk) 06:20, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bayt Awan was marked as contested https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Module%3ASyrian_Civil_War_detailed_map&type=revision&diff=686811705&oldid=686800849 on the basis of a very strange and unknown source. http://wahareport.com/2015/10/20/syria-daily-report-20102015/ 46.200.207.127 (talk) 18:30, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ithiriyah and Al Safira

You can remover black semi-circles near Ithiriyah and Al Safira. Firstly no one source not said that ISIS located in vicinity of Ithiriya ISIS only take some checkpoints on distance of 5km to east from this town. Also reliable source clear said that the with help from Russian Air Force the Syrian troops clear the Raqqa-Salamiyah Highway that is perpendicular to the Khanasser-Ithriyah Highway after intense clashes with the Islamic State.http://www.almasdarnews.com/article/russian-air-force-restarts-aerial-campaign-in-east-hama-to-help-the-syrian-army-defeat-isis/ and secondly Al Safira under SAA http://www.almasdarnews.com/article/massive-isis-offensive-in-east-aleppo-stalls-as-the-syrian-army-completely-recovers-al-safira/ and SOHR clear said that afte clashes between Syrian army against ISIS in vicinity of al-Safira area in southeastern countryside of Aleppo army regained control of points which they lost earlier.http://www.syriahr.com/en/2015/10/russian-airstrikes-target-a-headquarter-and-kill-2-fighters-in-northern-countryside-of-aleppo-and-the-clashes-continue/ So SOHR confirmed that the army retake their positions near city. So dont need black semi-circles near city Al Safira. 37.52.25.132 (talk) 08:44, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Violent clashes are still taking place between SAA/NDF against members of the ISIS on the road between Ithiriyah-Khanaser in the southeastern countryside of Aleppo, and SAA advance in the area and retake hills in there. http://www.syriahr.com/en/2015/10/the-regime-forces-advance-towards-khanaser-athrayya-road-seizing-hills-in-it-while-the-schools-closed-in-the-city-of-aleppo-fearing-of-aerial-bombardment/ 46.201.163.140 (talk) 17:37, 31 October 2015 (UTC) Pro SAA source reported that the SAA/NDF this morning regained more 8 km of the Khanasser - Ithriya road and still advancing.https://twitter.com/IvanSidorenko1/status/660360045138415616 46.201.163.140 (talk) 17:41, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

updates for map

  • You can removed green semicircle near Al-Safira Military Research Facility because no rebel presence in this area so this semicircle unjustified. And also add on map military object Sadkop Fuel Depot which is under SAA this confirmed (anti SAA source): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4PDYGXfRz0 here
  • SAA and Hezbollah retake integral hilltop at Tal Ithriya after clashes with ISIS. Khanasser-Ithriyah Highway is still closed due to ISIS presence along northern hills overlooking main road that is used by SAA. According to a source inside ciy of Hama, SAA/Hezbollah have less than 1km of territory left to go before Khanasser-Ithriya Highway is reopened.source ISIS for now controls only 1km of Highway in East Hama. So need removed black semi-circle near Ithriya. 91.124.122.249 (talk) 19:28, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • SAA in coordination with allies have advanced to south of Aleppo and capture villages Jamaymah and Maryameen in southern Aleppo also rebels complete withdrawal to town of Al-Hadher. With Jamaymah and Maryameen under their control, SAA and their allies are now in position to assault town of Al-Hadher. Currently, SAA and their allies are bombarding the town of Al-Hadher with mortar shells and rockets, but they have not made any attempts to enter it as of yet.source 91.124.122.249 (talk) 09:12, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sadad under SAA clashes between government troops and IS are said to be continuing on the outskirts of Sadad.BBC Al Masdarsource SOHR also said that clashes between the regime forces and allied militiamen against IS militants are still taking place on the eastern outskirts of the town.SOHR
  • And also you can removed green semicircle near Al-Safira Military Research Facility because no rebel presence in this area so this semicircle unjustified. 46.201.163.140 (talk) 21:30, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unable to penetrate town Sadad, ISIS withdrew to Maheen-Sadad Checkpoint; however, as they fled Sadad, SSNP/NDF soldiers struck ISIS’ defenses at Maheen-Sadad Checkpoint and to impose full control over Maheen-Sadad Checkpoint. Also SSNP and NDF repelled ISIS’ large-scale assault on small village of Hafr, which is located along road to the predominately Christian town of Deir Attiyah.source

  • Saddad under SAA
  • Huwwarin was marked under ISIS on based just data from anti-SAA source from twitter here
  • Abu Faraj marked under ISIS without any provision of any source.
Jabbul south of Kuwairis under SAA.here 46.201.163.140 (talk) 07:40, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
SAA/Hezbollah in southern Aleppo captured eastern entrance of Al-Hadher after intense firefights with Islamist rebels and FSA. Tthe eastern entrance to rebel stronghold of Al-Hadher was under control of the SAA/Hezbollah and fierce clashes are taking place inside this strategic town. North Al-Nusra/FSA are attempting to alleviate pressure on their forces inside town of Al-Hadher by storming the SAA defenses at Tal Huwayz – so far, only violent firefights reported, no gains.source 46.201.163.140 (talk) 10:57, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
SAA in coordination with allies imposed full control over the Ahad Mountains of east Hama after a series of intense firefights with ISIS along the strategic Khanasser-Ithriya Highway.source 46.201.163.140 (talk) 11:00, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Source said that the SAA imposed full control over Hill Number 11 the Ahad Mountains on the Khanasser-Ithriya Highway, also oil fields and pumping station near the strategic town of Aqayrbat http://www.almasdarnews.com/article/syrian-army-and-popular-committees-capture-several-sites-from-isis-in-east-hama/ 95.132.204.253 (talk) 13:02, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Biased sources

Hogg 22 marked as contested between SAA and JAN village Al-Humayrah here on based data from biased anti-SAA (Levantine Group) sources: here and pro FSA activist from twitter Free Syria. It is against the rules of editing. 46.201.163.140 (talk) 10:51, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SAA advance in Aleppo and Hama provinces

SAA in coordination with allies advance along the strategic Khanasser-Ithriya Highway in Hama Province and recaptured several sites from ISIS that are imperative to reopening the roadway. SAA/Hezbollah stormed were able to impose full control over the Ithriya Petrol Station and the surrounding field mounds that is located northeast of the town, after ISIS withdrew to a small village to the north of this site in the northern Hama countryside. In the last 72 hours, the SAA have been able to reclaim several kilometers of territory from ISIS that obstructed the Khanasser-Ithriya Highway; however, despite this successful operation in northeast Hama, the pro-government forces still have a little less than 1km of highway left to go before they can declare its liberation.http://www.almasdarnews.com/article/news-alert-syrian-army-and-popular-committees-capture-the-ithriya-petrol-station-in-east-hama/ 37.52.29.98 (talk) 07:25, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Khanasser-Ithriya Highway under SAA

SOHR reported that the Khanasser-Ithriya Highway under total control of the Syrian troops after 12 days of clashes against of ISIS which is cut this highway earlier.http://www.syriahr.com/2015/11/%D9%82%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%86%D8%B8%D8%A7%D9%85-%D8%AA%D8%B3%D8%AA%D8%B9%D9%8A%D8%AF-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B3%D9%8A%D8%B7%D8%B1%D8%A9-%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%89-%D8%B7%D8%B1%D9%8A%D9%82-%D8%AE%D9%86/ http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Middle-East/2015/Nov-04/321563-syria-army-reopens-road-to-govt-held-parts-of-aleppo.ashx So that need remove ISIS presence along of this highway. 37.52.29.98 (talk) 10:34, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-SAA(pro FSA) source confirmed that the Regime forces retake control of the chechpoints between Khanaser and Athirya, opening the route between Aleppo and Hama.https://twitter.com/Abduhark/status/661841073979924480 37.52.29.98 (talk) 10:51, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SAA advance near Jubb al Ahmar

SAA retake village: Jubb az-Zu'rur near village Barisha to west of village Fawru in Al Ghab Plain. http://www.almasdarnews.com/article/syrian-army-advances-north-towards-the-idlib-border-after-successful-operations-in-northeast-latakia/#prettyPhoto 46.200.207.236 (talk) 09:14, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pro-government Christian forces advance toward Mahin and Qaraytan

NDF, Syrian Social Nationalist Party, and the Gozarto Protection Forces launched a counter-offensive from the Maheen-Sadad checkpoint and recaptured hilltops of Tal Sinni, Tal Hazim and Al-Wastani and ISIS was forced to withdraw from this hilltop towards the town of Maheen after their frontlines fell. Also pro-government Christian forces are attempting to retake the town of Maheen and the ancient Syriac Christian city of Quraytayn, which are both currently under the control of ISIS.http://www.almasdarnews.com/article/christian-forces-fight-back-against-isis-in-east-homs-several-hilltops-captured-near-maheen/ 46.200.207.236 (talk) 09:39, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SOHR also reported that the clashes in the vicinity of town Mahin in the southeastern countryside of Homs between the regime forces backed by gunmen loyal to them against the ISIS.http://www.syriahr.com/en/2015/11/more-deaths-caused-by-airstrikes-on-al-qaryatayn-city/ So maybe need put red semi-circle near Mahin. 46.200.207.236 (talk) 10:04, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jabal al Hazm - under SAA.source 37.53.151.251 (talk) 10:29, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You can add Jabal al Hazm to east from Saddad on map. 37.52.27.49 (talk) 09:19, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hama/Aleppo/Dara/Homs/Latakia provinces and East Ghouta updates

Editor marked village Shugaydilah under FSA according to data from biased anti-SAA source ARA News.here But this is a gross violation of the rules of editing. Also reporter Hosein Mortada confirmed that the village still under SAA.here Only pro-FSA sources claim that the rebels retake village. So please fix this. Also this guy edit to favor of Kurds on based data from pro-kurdish sources.
  • SAA in coordination with allies carried out a powerful assault at the eastern slopes of the Al-Hiyal Mountains (Jabal Al-Hiyal) and seizing several points from ISIS en route to their advance past the town of Al-Bayarat in east Homs.source
  • SAA restarted their large-scale assault inside the strategic town of Sheikh Ahmad in the Deir Hafer Plains. SAA/NDF/Al-Ba’ath Battalions – stormed the northern district of Sheikh Ahmad. Currently, the SAA is approximately 2,500 meters away from the Kuweries Military Airport, despite not being in full control of Sheikh Ahmad.source 95.134.223.36 (talk) 08:12, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pro FSA source said that the SAA/Hezbollah take over most of Marj as-Sultan & Marj as-Sultan helicopter base.source 37.52.25.102 (talk) 14:43, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kherbet al-Mahal Tell Bajer under SAA source and the town Al-Eis under SAA.SOHR and also SAA captured Sysacco Chemical Plant source 37.52.28.243 (talk) 08:01, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
SAA andvance near Mahin and retake Army Storage Base near Mahin.SOHR Anti-SAA sources: Step News AgencyAksalserAlkhaleej Onlin, Jabal Mahin.source and retake parts of the town Mahin.SOHR 46.200.240.93 (talk) 21:23, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Some Military bases in Aleppo was edited without sources

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Paolowalter&oldid=692083923"