Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Post Medieval

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sam Sailor (talk | contribs) at 01:49, 28 November 2015 (Relisting Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Post Medieval). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Post Medieval (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

"Post Medieval" can be used in many contexts, not just archaeology. The archaeological usage is already discussed at Post-medieval archaeology. In Western history, the Renaissance comes to mind as "post-medieval". As a WP:DICDEF of an adjective, I don't see this as worth holding on to. BDD (talk) 20:19, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. BDD (talk) 20:21, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. BDD (talk) 20:21, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Post-medieval archaeology. The use of the term is primarily archaeological. 60 years ago, no one paid attention to archaeology after Prehistoric and Roman (yes, probably an exaggeration), so the Society for Medieval Archaeology was formed. The question of what to do about later periods led to the foundation of the Society for Post-Medieval Archaeology. Terminology on periods has followed. Historians normally talk about the "early modern period". I accordingly regard BDD as wrong. Alternatively, the article should be transwikified to the dictionary. Peterkingiron (talk) 20:22, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:24, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 01:49, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]