Talk:Hans Henning Atrott

LOST BOY'S AND HIS FELLOW GERMANS' PSYCHOLOGICAL PROJECTIONS

Defamous "Lost Boy" and other German editor warriors of German Wikipedia - mostly chided for megalomania even by German readers of German Wikipedia - presumes for upbraid others for purported "missionary work," here, i.e. in English Wikipedia. This is a very psychological projection of his and his fellows. It is precisely that what the Germans are used to doing here when romping around this article on Atrott to get another information in line with their canting of the Germans' and Christians' crimes on him, mostly fabricated by referring to unfair German newspaper articles on him, by which the German media and churches enforced the crimes of infringement of (German) law on Atrott. GERMANS KEEP OUT, HERE!

A citizen from Lithuania -- 86.100.19.106 (talk) 21:01, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

The edit warriors of German Wikipedia want to cover the Germans' shame concerning Atrott. They even removed the end of this article that Atrott left Germany. The background of this exile debunks a very ignominy of the Germans. Since the life of Hans Atrott did not end in 1995, i.e., twenty years ago, it is of interest what the aged Atrott did. This knowledge is important since the German Wikipedia article replaces facts by rumors (in order to cover the shame of the Holocaustland).

Another citizen of Lithuania where Hans Atrott was born 84.15.187.118 (talk) 07:04, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

HERE, NEVER WAS A DISCUSSION BY THE GERMANS BUT CANTANKEROUSNESS AND BOSSINESS BY THE GERMAN FUEHRERS

German Wikipedia's outflow on Atrott even Germans deem as funny. For example, its article on German Voluntary Euthanasia Society (D.G.H.S.) presumes to be "profound information" by concealing the founder, the one who built up this start-up enterprise and the one who initially designed the organization and made it known worldwide... This speaks volumes of jokes. Even in this version of Wikipedia, the Germans defended the German-Christian homosexual and pedophile pastor (Emil Zimmerningkat) who committed sexual crimes on A., as long as an expert of American Wikipedia stated that those sexual crimes are perpetrated by pedophiles in the way A. described. There is no end of German ridiculousness, in this article! Everything is recorded, here. Everybody can prove the facts! Here one of the militants pretends that there was a discussion on this article on Atrott, respectively, about the Germans' permanent interventions to bring this article in line with the shameful as laughable German one. Since everything is recorded here, it should be easy to furnish evidence a) when and b) where such discussions took place. Such discussions are unknown to me. I only can notice that the Germans always want(ed) to force the will of their own on others. We (Germans) decided, everybody has to comply!!! This is what in the Holocaustland is called: "discussion." Nothing else happens here. The criteria about self-publishing - being no taint today - is the question about the fact: Who is keeping the copyright? Self-publishers always keep their copyright. The Germans shall explain how somebody can lose its copyright by self-publishing. Those who do not self-publish pass the copyright to the publisher. The Germans here always are used to tramping: We are Germans; we decide what is what and everybody has to comply with our contrivances, regardless the facts. A German's ("Fueherer") mind shifts mountains and the truths and facts, anyway.

1.) Please, furnish evidence when and where you ever discussed something in place of grafting your bossiness upon others. 2.) You should furnish evidence that there is self-publishing without self-owning the copyright! Here never was a discussion but German cantankerousness, bossiness and the Holocaustland's Fuehrertum...! MORE INFORMATION TO THIS TOPIC ALSO ON MY TALK PAGEhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Schinkelburg#GERMAN_WIKIPEDIA_LAWLESSLY_USES_A_PICTURE_OF_MINE Schinkelburg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Schinkelburg (talk • contribs) 22:07, 21 November 2015 (UTC) Schinkelburg (talk) 11:19, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

The Spanish translation of Jesus' Bluff, also a self-translation and self-publishing?

In the meantime, the book has been published in Spanish (La Farsa de Jesus) and is going to become translated in about a dozen languages. Are these editions also self-translations and self-publishing, according to the German laughing stocks' "faith shifts mountains and the truths anyway..."? Schinkelburg (talk) 11:26, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Latest Joke from Germany, i.e. the Holocaustland: "There was no publisher involved in the books of Hans Atrott"

For Details see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Schinkelburg 88.151.210.214 (talk) 23:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

THE GERMAN EDITORS OF WIKIPEDIA EVEN IN GERMANY ARE CALLED FASCISTIC

Since the German-Wikipedia editors for already about ten years have been trying to get this article in line with a funny one of their own, the readers should get informed why they are used to fussing here that obsessively.

Authors of encyclopedias should be folks committed to the matter and keeping a knowledge of that about which they write without bias. They should be able to realize, discuss and evaluate the facts. German Wikipedia editors as far as they are busy with the topics in question and the leadership of this branch do not keep such abilities. They pretend discussing something while demonstrably being unable to do so; they are impervious to reason, facts and the truths, they cannot bear. Even in the German internet, the “Seewolf” deservedly is accused of “fascistic” methods . He confirms this judgment. However, what the Germans call “fascistic,” in general, is the behavior of foul players. As contrast, featuring the behavior of gangs in American streets with this self-named wolf, one hardly can see a difference between the behavior of the mentioned German and those gangs in the streets. The one like the others are asking for trouble. Seewolf and his fellows from the Holocaustland can refute this comparison, however, not by their self-delusions but by reality. Both are impervious to reason, truths, lawfulness and are used to laughing at the competence, sincerity and honor of others. No wonder that even many Germans correctly realize that what clusters behind the name of Wikipedia (in the Holocaustland) is fascistic. "Seewolf" always presumes to command me to point out my view on my talk page. However, when I have done so, he turns out as apparently suffering from perceptual infirmity and starts repeating his command to do that what already is done and to what he cannot and will not refute. In the German internet I found the following statement: “(German) Wikipedia – The knowledge of the World in the hands of rabbit breeders … and Seewolf’s simplemindedly filters of words.” There verbatim is spoken about fascistic administrators within (German) Wikipedia and he properly is outed as one of them. It is about delusion of grandeur and corresponding psychological projections. The just mentioned notorious self-name of a wolf also is romping around here. This wolf even demonstrably presumes to proffer the “genial idea” that finding fault with crimes, like, for example, with sexual crimes of pedophiles only can be done for emotions... In the same way, the "fascistic administrators" (see: annotations) of German Wikipedia can instruct the world that those who do not accept the Nazis’ crimes only do so for emotions, should control their feelings and reasoning and then will find everything as correct … Firstly, the Nazis when perpetrating their atrocities argued in that way and secondly, the infamous Kurt Fritz Schobert – dubbed: Nazi-Fritz – among this German "fascistic" edit warriors of Wikipedia indeed exhorted his fellow Germans in that way!!! That is why Nazi-Fritz became dismissed by Hans Henning Atrott. Do not the Nazis prefer the name “wolf,” (too)…? This wolf even is not able to realize where he and his fellows are ridiculed. Sober judgment and the description of their raw lack of competence, the fascistic administrator) misjudges as indignation. Comparably, making those incompetent ones to be editors of Wikipedia is like setting illiterates to teach the scripture or the Nazis to instruct morals. My word, did you guess this German “ingenuity”? Schinkelburg (talk) 11:30, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

THE "COMPETENCE" OF GERMAN SEEWOLF

Webpage famousbirthdays.com - notable for ranking international celebrities - puts extremely "educated" and "competent philosopher" Seewolf even in the 43rd place of all the great philosophers of all humankind. Never estimate a megalomaniac cigarettes seller! See: http://www.famousbirthdays.com/profession/philosopher.html Schinkelburg (talk) 09:39, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

"SEEWOLF - the edit warrior without arguments

What arguments do you have? Please, refute the ones with which you do not agree! You only show a strong will with which everybody shall comply, even against better knowledge!

FIRST REFUATION AND AFTERWARD EVALUATION (CONDEMNATION)!

Schinkelburg (talk) 12:38, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

WHY MUTILATING THIS BIOGRAPHY?

For example, if a person almost for one-third of his whole life does not live in the country, in which he is supposed dwelling, in my views, it is worth mentioning. The vandal "Seewolf" only deletes, deletes and deletes without any foundation. Schinkelburg (talk) 13:26, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

AAAAND here we go again: Leaving a country to go to live in another country is NOT going into exile (which implies being prosecuted, harassed and so on for other than egitimate reasons). You might want to use terms like "moved to" or the like. And please, do NOT open this can of worms again. Use correct terms and life might become easier. Best regards,Lost Boy (talk) 13:44, 9 December 2015 (UTC)