User talk:LeoFrank

Leave me a message

Regarding your edit to Vineeth Vincent

Hi, Thanks for your edit but you deleted a section that was adequately referenced. If you have a difference in opinion please feel free to use the talk page at Talk:Vineeth_Vincent. Thanks Vincentvikram (talk) 17:48, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

@Vincentvikram: Wikipedia is not a fanpage. Whether the content has secondary sources or not, is irrelevant given that it is meant to promote a person. The same set of edits were removed earlier by another editor and you re-instated them. — LeoFrank  ^Talk 17:55, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Show me the edits that were undone before that were not acceptable as you claim. The content is adequately cited from reliable secondary sources. Further, they are from a neutral perspective. You are invited to have a discussion at the talk page as I have mentioned earlier. Vincentvikram (talk) 18:00, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

@Vincentvikram: Look at the article history. As mentioned in my previous comment, whether the content has secondary sources or not is irrelevant as it does nothing but promote an entity. No, it's not a neutral perspective at all. FYI, I was Vineet's batch mate from CJC and know him very well. But I would still refrain from adding this content. — LeoFrank  ^Talk 18:04, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

I did look at the article history and this paragraph was added just a day ago. The other content is irrelevant as it has been moved into the external links section. If you feel it is not neutral then make it neutral instead of deleting. Could your acquaintance of the individual could be a potential bias? Vincentvikram (talk) 18:06, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Just letting you know that I have moved the section you deleted to the talk section. If neutrality is the issue you are citing then it can be improved and moved back. Vincentvikram (talk) 18:11, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Tirupati Airport

You know about airports international status well. So, could you check it for some corrections in International status section.--Vin09 (talk) 07:36, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Also, I've removed Tadepalligudem Airport in List of Airports in Andhra Pradesh. Is it correct.--Vin09 (talk) 07:43, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Delta Air Lines Fleet page

Hi LeoFrank. I know you are an experienced and respected editor for aviation related pages. Would you please cite the WP authority you are basing the removal of the Special Liveries table from the article? The table has been in the article for years. I understand that by itself longevity doesn't qualify it to always be in the article. I just want to understand why the table is now being removed. Simply stating that the table is "not notable" explains nothing. If there is a policy by the Wikipedia Aviation project covering special liveries can you please cite if for me? In my opinion this table is both encyclopedic and easily verifiable by reliable sources. Usually items that are considered "not notable" on fleet pages are travel guide type bits of information such as amenities or trivia like "largest operator of...." statements. Thanks in advance. 67.42.159.123 (talk) 17:35, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Ok, I've answered my own question. Per Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Registrations found at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Aviation/Registrations#Airline_fleet_lists Special Livery sections are allowed. Here is the relevant quote: "Airline fleet lists should not include registrations, although aircraft in special paint schemes can be identified either in a Livery section or in the general text." Based on this authority II am reverting your deletion of the Delta Air Lines Pleet page Special Liveries section. Thanks LeoFrank 67.42.156.207 (talk) 04:28, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Juniper MX-Series

I noticed you added a refimprove tag to the page last June. I've shared a draft on the Talk page that would replace all the press release sources with actual secondary sources (press articles). I used the Talk page because I have a COI. I thought since you have shown an interest in the page previously, you may be available to take a look. David King, Ethical Wiki (Talk) 23:06, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

@CorporateM: I have just added the tag for someone else to have a look at the issue since I have a COI as well with Juniper Networks . — LeoFrank  ^Talk 16:23, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Please read and reply to the Delta Air Lines Fleet page message above

I am going to revert your removal of the Special Liveries Section again. A Liveries section is allowed per the cited authority above. Please do not remove it again. 70.57.120.194 (talk) 17:27, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

More info on the Delta Air Lines Fleet Talk Page if you prefer to discus the issue there. Do not remove the section again before consensus is reached. 70.57.120.194 (talk) 18:32, 12 December 2015 (UTC)