Jump to content

User talk:Jacobrubinovitz

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jacobrubinovitz (talk | contribs) at 11:16, 15 December 2015. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Mephistophelian (contact) 10:35, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I want to submit the article now. What to do?

Welcome!

Hello, Jacobrubinovitz, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Snowysusan (talk) 03:10, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discusion on 23/12/20012

References were added following the reviewer remarks. I want to resubmit the article now. What to do? In fact, the article was resubmitted for review.

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 19:39, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jacobrubinovitz (talk) 19:05, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! SarahStierch (talk) 07:57, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia! Need a hand?

Teahouse logo
Hello! Jacobrubinovitz, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SarahStierch (talk) 07:57, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012

Please do not write or add to an article about yourself, as you apparently did at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jacobrubinovitz. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. SarahStierch (talk) 07:57, 23 December 2012 (UTC) Jacobrubinovitz 09:51, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Menny Rabinovich

I noticed that you keep adding AFC submission tags to Menny Rabinovich. The article has already been approved and exists in mainspace; it doesn't need to go through the AFC process again. I noticed also that you introduced three different spellings of the subject's name into the article: the spelling that has been approved is "Menny Rabinovich"; if you think a different spelling should be used, you should make a case for that on the article's talk page, which you can find here. Finally, you should be aware that academic titles such as "Dr" and trademarks such as "®" shouldn't be used on Wikipedia, except in a few very limited cases. See WP:CREDENTIAL and MOS:TM. Don't forget that you can visit the Teahouse if you need any help editing. Alexrexpvt (talk) 15:39, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Menny Rabinovich for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Menny Rabinovich is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Menny Rabinovich until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Alexrexpvt (talk) 16:11, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Menny Rabinovich

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Israeli multi-scientists

A tag has been placed on Category:Israeli multi-scientists requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for four days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jacobrubinovitz 00:37, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! DGG ( talk ) 02:20, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Menahem Rabinovich, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

BO | Talk 15:23, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

Please stop adding a birth to the events section of September 6. Births are not classified as events. If you have questions please ask. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 19:00, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jacob Rubinovitz, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 19:11, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Let's have a discussion about your work here and how you can accomplish what you wish to accomplish. One suggestion I'll make at the start is that you should request a username change. Your username is in violation of our username policy because it is the name of a real person and that person is not you. Changing it will help to alleviate some of the conflict of interest concerns. We should address those separately. If you do not engage in discussion, your edits may be considered disruptive and you could be blocked from editing. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 19:33, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I will contemplate a name change Jacobrubinovitz 20:03, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
Contemplation is not appropriate in this case. Per WP:IMPERSONATE I strongly suggest that your next edit be at WP:CHU or here on this page to discuss your intentions in editing in general. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 20:42, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like you were confused. Click on WP:CHU. Follow the instructions there to request a new username. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 20:56, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
please change my article name from Jacob Rubinovitz to Dr. Jacob Rubinovitz Thanks Jacobrubinovitz 21:17, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
That wouldn't be appropriate. Prefixes are not used in article titles. The username change is different from the article name. Your username is presently Jacobrubinovitz. You can't use that name unless you are Jacob Rubinovitz. That's what you need to change at WP:CHU. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 21:31, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I changed my username as required.Thanks 93.173.148.148 (talk) 21:45, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Clearly you didn't if you are still editing under this username. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 22:07, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I do not want to argue. There is not and was not disruptive editing. Please remove the blockade. Jacobrubinovitz 08:53, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

This account is blocked from editing per the warnings at User talk:Sagi Rubin. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 11:03, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove the block of user Jacobrubinovitz, or clearly state the reason for not doing so. Jacobrubinovitz 08:35, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Menahem Rabinovich, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Israeli and Fellowship (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Please remove the block on user Jacobrubinovitz

There was no disruptive editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.181.171.47 (talk) 14:08, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
Jacobrubinovitz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Jacobrubinovitz". The reason given for Jacobrubinovitz's block is: "Disruptive editing: Username violations. Se also User

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
Jacobrubinovitz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Jacobrubinovitz". The reason given for Jacobrubinovitz's block is: "Disruptive editing: Username violations. Se also User

Decline reason: You are blocked directly, not caught in an autoblock. You cannot use multiple accounts to edit as long as your block remains in place. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 00:11, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Jacobrubinovitz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There was no disruptive editing at any moment

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=There was no disruptive editing at any moment |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=There was no disruptive editing at any moment |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=There was no disruptive editing at any moment |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Jacobrubinovitz 11:16, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jacobrubinovitz&oldid=695342012"