Jump to content

User talk:Bellerophon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user has autopatrolled rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has pending changes reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has rollback rights on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 03:31, 16 December 2015 (Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Bellerophon/Archive 15) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:NoBracketBot

User page

Go to my user page
Go to my user page

Talk

Click here to goto my talk page, where you can leave a message for me.
Click here to goto my talk page, where you can leave a message for me.

Email

Please do not email me for routine matters! Only email me for matters you do not wish to discuss on-Wiki.
Please do not email me for routine matters! Only email me for matters you do not wish to discuss on-Wiki.

Adoption

Check out my adoption school
Check out my adoption school

Awards

My awards and recognitions
My awards and recognitions

Contribs

Click here to see my contributions to Wikipedia
Click here to see my contributions to Wikipedia
SEMI-RETIRED
This user is no longer very active on Wikipedia.

Messages on this talk page are archived after 1 month by a bot.
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15

Question

hello sir/madam I have updated the following pages notibility and referencing by major standards and hope you can review it please. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Kezia_Noble

Kind Regards

Jayesh Patel 31/03/2015 at 21:27 (uk time)

User:Bellerophon/Sandbox/WikiProject user warnings, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Bellerophon/Sandbox/WikiProject user warnings and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Bellerophon/Sandbox/WikiProject user warnings during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 21:14, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

JSTOR cleanup drive

Hello TWL users! We hope JSTOR has been a useful resource for your work. We're organizing a cleanup drive to correct dead links to JSTOR articles – these require JSTOR access and cannot easily be corrected by bot. We'd love for you to jump in and help out!



Sent of behalf of Nikkimaria for The Wikipedia Library's JSTOR using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:18, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see you've performed a rollback on the Andrew Charalambous article. This has removed a number of informative and surely non-contentious sections, such as the infobox, schooling and further relevant detail on Charmlambous' stance on a number of issues. Also if a person is notable due to contentious aspects of his public image and activities surely these areas should be discussed in the article, examining both sides of each area. If these sections are edited down and made more objective I believe they could make the article more informative without promoting either a positive or negative POV of the subject. I don't want to go to the trouble if it's just going to be rolled back again. How do you suggest I proceed? Hi-Peak Internet (talk) 09:17, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]