Jump to content

User talk:Angry Bald English Villian Man

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Angry Bald English Villian Man (talk | contribs) at 05:38, 2 January 2016 (→Unblock). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

October 2015

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Peppy Paneer (talk) 08:56, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Angry Bald English Villian Man, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi Angry Bald English Villian Man! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Samwalton9 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse
This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:20, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of bald villains (October 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikiisawesome was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
/wia /tlk /cntrb 21:03, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jono Kenyon

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Jono Kenyon, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://tvnz.co.nz/step-dave/jono-kenyon-plays-5803989.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:54, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jono Kenyon

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jono Kenyon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://tvnz.co.nz/step-dave/jono-kenyon-plays-5803989. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Finngall talk 05:57, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

With this ever dramatic world including WikiDrama, here's a cup of tea to alleviate your day! This e-tea's remains have been e-composted SwisterTwister talk 06:49, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! --Angry Bald English Villian Man (talk) 06:57, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited From Darkness, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Johnny Harris (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:View of Masterton.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:View of Masterton.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. gadfium 21:32, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deprod

I have removed the {{prod}} tag from Drum Feedback, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! 2602:30A:2EFE:F050:E52A:8C67:E2A2:B864 (talk) 09:09, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wainuioru

Thanks for starting this article. I've made a few improvements to it. Please remember that it's an international encyclopedia, and we don't all know where Masterton is - it's important to specify what country you're talking about. Also, please remember that everything in Wikipedia needs to be sourced to "Reliable Sources": please give us a reference to an authoritative website or book to support what you add to the encyclopedia. There's a lot to learn about editing Wikipedia but it's an interesting journey. Happy Editing! PamD 10:40, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Broods Caleb and Georgia Nott.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Broods Caleb and Georgia Nott.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Adabow (talk) 23:04, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm SwisterTwister. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, He Pai Noa (song), and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. SwisterTwister talk 02:13, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Timothy M Wolfe

Just wanted to follow up on your comment on [[User_talk:JJUGA08]'s page. You can see here they actually had the references in at first, and then a vandal blanked the page, and then it looks like they copied and pasted their work from somewhere that didn't include the references. Seems they are a new user who didn't know how to fix vandalism properly, now their hard work is stuck in the edit history. Anyways, hopefully someone with more time can fix it. I need to go to bed! ;) XinJeisan (talk) 15:55, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know that because it might considered a BLP violation and i do fix up Vandalism properly but will fix up vandalism better one day XinJeisan (talk) --Angry Bald English Villian Man (talk) 21:30, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bare URLs

Hello Angry Bald English Villian Man, some of our interests overlap, and although you've been a rather recent editor, I've seen quite a few of your edits appear on my watchlist. Keep up the good work. If you allow me, I'd like to suggest that you read up on bare URLs and why they are a problem, e.g. this edit. When in the editor window, go to the 'cite' tab and use the 'templates' drop down menu, and that gives you convenient templates to fill out for referencing that avoids this problem. Any questions, please feel free to ask here (I've added your talk page to my watchlist). Schwede66 04:37, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Daley quote from The Guardian

So why was my contribution not "constructive"? It provides a verbatim interview quote from a WP:RS (The Guardian), clarifying Daley's view on the matter. Having a clear statement like this mitgh help stop all this futile edit warring over whether he is "gay" (whatever that means), or not. You give no edit summary explaining your revert, so please provide one. 217.38.145.102 (talk) 10:07, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The filter tag says it a possible BLP issue for vandalism because it was first thought it was vandalism in my head then i reverted it. But you said it was constructive, and also you have tell the right thing about a verbatim interview about whatever he was gay or not and will provide an edit summary next time. But also i live in New Zealand mostly do NZ and UK articles, also marking articles for deletion. --Angry Bald English Villian Man Chat 10:22, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. Good luck with the vandalism in your head. 217.38.145.102 (talk) 10:31, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 11 November 2015

Your patrol log

Villan Man,

I reviewed your patrol log and it seemed fine to me. Cheers! Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 09:19, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. Angry Bald English Villian Man Chat 09:27, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sources, living person

You just redid all the changes on the page on living person Dag Øistein Endsjø due to what you called the lack of you citations to reliable sources. If you look closer at my changes, they are mainly doing just that, adding reliable secondary sources, from various books and articles referring to Endsjø. Besides that, I only cleaned up a bit the order, and added a couple of small things which, again, was supported by secondary sources. User talk:Hansrud 9:32, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Because i thought it was a libel in my first thought in my head then you told me it had reliable sources. But are you actually doing the right thing? I don't know because i think you vandalising a page if so you risk being blocked from editing, please take care next time if you change a page such as Dag Øistein Endsjø article because i didn't know it was libel in the first place. Sorry for that. Angry Bald English Villian Man Chat 09:01, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I will do revisions more in small pieces next time, so that it does not seem like I am making complete makeovers, when adding sources and changing orders of sections on an article User talk:Hansrud 10:16, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good news User talk:Hansrud! i just reverted back to your edits, despite the Filter tag says possible BLP issue or vandalism, its not a libel and also i was lying. You have good faith in Wikipedia and if you keep it up well you can be a administrator on day if you prefer. Angry Bald English Villian Man Chat 09:13, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 November 2015

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Swpb. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Octal Data Rate, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. —Swpbtalk 14:20, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 25 November 2015

ethiopia

I added details if watch good--Sennaitgebremariam (talk) 14:21, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MasterChef New Zealand

Hi there. I just received your message about having reverted my contribution to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MasterChef_New_Zealand , due to it not appearing constructive. The text "Maddison was here 2015", which you removed, was *not* written by me, but by 222.153.19.23! See https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=MasterChef_New_Zealand&diff=682963066&oldid=682067306 for proof. 85.81.82.15 (talk) 14:43, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The reason why i removed it because it was vandalism that the text "Maddison was here 2015" is not constructive within Wikipedia polices if you but the texxt back in you will be blocked from editing. --Angry Bald English Villian Man Chat 00:04, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have at no time put the text back in. And I'm not going to put it back in now. Because, yes, it was indeed vandalism. Perpetrated by 222.153.19.23, not me. 85.81.82.15 (talk) 00:35, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank God for that because the creator was Franc Roddam not that bloody "Maddison was here 2015". The text "Maddison was here 2015" will mislead Wikipedia readers and editors and they will go off for a while. Thanks for a comment. --Angry Bald English Villian Man Chat 00:54, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Roy Colsey

How are my edits disruptive and vandalistic when in fact, I am trying to do just the opposite? Thanks. 98.118.164.137 (talk) 07:33, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

EDIT: Nevermind, I copied the wrong one from a previous vandal... very sorry. 98.118.164.137 (talk) 07:35, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to do better. --Angry Bald English Villian Man Chat 07:36, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have fixed it. Cheers for looking out for the page though. 98.118.164.137 (talk) 07:38, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wallington Public Hall, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sutton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 02 December 2015

pending changes reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:


Sodom, Wiltshire

Where did you find that population figure? Please add a source. PamD 09:51, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Coromandel Gold Rush, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://mineforgold.co.nz/mining-gold/nz-gold-mining-history/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Coromandel Gold Rush saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! gadfium 01:02, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Empty category

What is the point in setting up Category:People from Hicks Bay and then not populating it? Once they've been empty for four days, they are eligible for speedy deletion. Schwede66 20:33, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Because i'm silly enough to create a such empty category for myself then looked up many websites on notable people from Hicks Bay even Te Ara Encyclopedia but there were no results. One day Schwede66 i will create an good category when the people are the most notable. Dunno?????? --Angry Bald English Villian Man Chat 22:21, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see. I'll wait another three days and put the category up for deletion. Schwede66 22:39, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 09 December 2015

Block Notice

 CheckUser evidence has determined that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely to prevent abuse.

Administrators: CheckUsers are privy to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy, and therefore must be consulted before this block can be removed. Administrators undoing checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser risk having their administrator rights removed by the Arbitration Committee (per this announcement). -- Mike V • Talk 00:32, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Angry Bald English Villian Man (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account wasn't even used abusively. I have good contributions on Wikipedia which i'am enjoying right now, also im a pending changes reviewer but i only performed the action once. My account is only one precious and my IP and not multiply abused sock accounts like my one. I have a plenty of future on Wikipedia because Wikiepdia is centre of my life. Angry Bald English Villian Man Chat 00:42, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

From the information that I have, your good hand, bad hand editing with several accounts/IPs, and also some of your bad hand editing goes to extremes that we don't tolerate by any means here at Wikipedia. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 04:37, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Angry Bald English Villian Man (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I just want to be unblocked, please, unblock yes, unblock, unblock me cm'on, unblock me, unblock Right now. Its not a warranted block and i want to have second chance of editing. Angry Bald English Villian Man Chat 23:07, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Max Semenik (talk) 08:34, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Angry Bald English Villian Man (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I know i want to be a administator one day i think blocking me is a wrongful thing from a person do to. I have plenty of interesting of things on Wikipedia that i'am looking afford to such as dealing with vandalism and marking articles for deletion. Wikipedia edting is a centre of my life and i have only one account not a sock of somebody which i'am not related to like Bettifm. Look! my account is not used abusively from a sockmaster it just used by oneself which is me which is much better typical edting than that. Finally i want to apologize to a person who blocked me unwarranted and improper and hope i can get unblocked and back to editing to my oneself. Angry Bald English Villian Man Chat 02:43, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Looking through your recent edits and unblock requests, all I see is a lot of nope. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:52, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As you can see by the message left by Mike V, Angry Bald English Villian Man, you have a checkuser block placed on your account and a regular administrator can not unblock you. Your request has to be considered by a checkuser such as DeltaQuad who has already reviewed your unblock request.
You will have to wait and see if or when another checkuser wants to reconsider the evidence (meaning, it's not going to happen immediately). Liz Read! Talk! 23:31, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thats fine Liz Read! Talk!. I have a checkuser block as a sockpuppet of Bettifm which is troubled and no connections to him because i'am better editor than that. --Angry Bald English Villian Man Chat 00:58, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mike V • Talk you forgot to put the tag on my userpage as a sockpuppet of bettifm

 Comment: Two requests for un-block have been declined, now a third (on a confirmed {{checkuserblock}}) maybe talkpage access should be removed. Mlpearc (open channel) 02:55, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't talk like that. The reason the wikipedia is the centre of my life because i have a bright future looking afford then a checkuser block me that treats me like a bully because it a sock account that is totally bullshit not my account that is my one and own. CheckUsers are a liar bullshit. Guees what? i'am so sick of declined unblock request which is uncivil to me and hurts my feelings. I'm sorry about this nasty comment because the truth was joke, my account is a sock of Bettifm not my one own account i acutally think the CheckUsers are doing right thing to me being foreful about blocking me. Then i shout all the guys yorkshire pudding with eggs on top and a british made tea that dosen't make it propley. Finaly i finish off i'am a god pedning changes review that i only done once but not anymore. If someone accept unblock request from me by tomorrow i will have a pending chanfes reviewer rights again of not i just give up and retire for good. Hope is so good. --Angry Bald English Villian Man Chat 12:19, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

why did you decline my unblock request because its not good enough or just don't want to because you being uncivil and being stubborn. i have nope my talk page. Would my checkuser Mike V or Bbb23 check it again because i want my user page to tagged as a sock puppet of Bettifm. Look Ohnoitsjamie i know administrators can't unblock socks nor checkusers even they ask permission from checkusers if i'am a administrator or everyone they could not. To be Honest with you i suggest that i have a poor grammar, can't spell and troubled countributions that Schwede66 told me [User talk:Gadfium#Bettifm|earlier last year] i should retire or blank the talk page till i have talk page access removed which it will happen soon. i wouldn't hold my breath. Angry Bald English Villian Man Chat 05:38, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 16 December 2015

The Signpost: 30 December 2015

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Angry_Bald_English_Villian_Man&oldid=697829779"