Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ESPN25 Biggest Flops

Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of lists, especially copywrited ones. Maxamegalon2000 22:34, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry; I should mention that this article was prodded by User:Jaranda, seconded by User:Revragnarok and contested by User:Porterjoh. --Maxamegalon2000 22:55, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per my prod^2 seconding... — RevRagnarok ^{Talk Contrib} 22:38, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nomination.--Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 01:33, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The Modern Library lists of books are also copywritten, yet included in wikipedia. I also very much like the idea of having some of the less stellar "achievements" of athletes as well. Too many read like secular hagiographies as it is. Badbilltucker 15:53, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Send to the copyvio folks Someone over there should be in charge of making consistent choices about whether lists from published sources are copyrighted (not copywritten). If it's not a copyvio, I see no harm in keeping it. Carlossuarez46 21:35, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep if someone will improve it I agree with Badbilltucker's post; that said, it could still use some work. --Billfred 02:36, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]