Jump to content

User talk:Tassedethe

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by NihartouJason (talk | contribs) at 04:27, 14 January 2016 (Completely False Article Frederick_Achom: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

You are welcome to leave messages here. I will reply here rather than on your talk page, unless you indicate otherwise. Conversely, if I've left a message on your talk page, I'm watching it, so please reply there.

Dear editor,

Welcome!

Hello, Tassedethe! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Gimme danger (talk) 12:19, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Sam Brown, activist

Dear editor of Wikipedia entry for Sam Brown, activist. I was a classmate of Sam Brown's at the University of Redlands, and able to confirm that he was the Student Body President for the 1964-65 academic year. I was President of the Senior graduating class that year and still have our 1965 yearbook, "La Letra", containing a photo on page 72 identifying Sam Brown as Student Body (ASUR) Pres., and a photo on page 85 identifying him as a member of the university's Republican Club.

Thank you for reading this and editing the Sam Brown entry to correctly attribute this biographical fact as no longer being based on an unreliable source.

Mike LaFave

Apart from a minor edit I have no connection to the page Sam Brown (activist). You would do better posting at that article's talk page. Tassedethe (talk) 01:36, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Rahul Kumar has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:58, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Viento a favor

The article Viento a favor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:TWODABS; one article exists, the second is a redirect for lack of notability, WP:PRIMARYTOPIC applies.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. © Tbhotch (en-2.5). 23:43, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Completely False Article Frederick_Achom

Hello,

I would like to draw your attention to this wikipedia article Frederick Achom, at first look it looks like a good article, but it hides most of the real information. If you see article's history you will see that it has been under several editing wars. Almost all claims made in the article are supported in the article are made using own links or PR releases. Also the links which seem genuine like London's 1000 most influential people 2010: Night OwlsLondon's 1000 most influential people 2011: Night Owls have many things wrong in them- they claim to be 1000 but not more than 6 are present; they have no author. They are off the website but somehow have crept into the website. There are many such cases in this wiki article.

Frederick Achom is using his wiki article to show potential investors how great he is by supplying all false information and duping them of money. He has been previously convicted and jailed which was earlier in the article but now has somehow disappeared. [1] [2]

[3] [4]

I hope you will understand the gravity of the situation and help in rectifying by either getting the page deleted or corrected.

Thank You. NihartouJason (talk) 04:27, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]