Talk:Hundred Days
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on February 26, 2006, February 26, 2007, March 20, 2009, March 20, 2010, February 26, 2011, March 20, 2012, and March 20, 2014. |
Index
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 61 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
New articles
One of the new articles is the Waterloo Campaign previously a redirect to this article. Most of the content for this article is copied from sections in this one. For more details see Talk:Battle of Waterloo#New articles -- PBS (talk) 13:48, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
Civilian casualties
Should there be some mention of civilian casualties? I know the war was driven by large set piece battles and army manoeuvres but there must be some sources covering the impact on the local population.©Geni (talk) 04:38, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
I am extracting a detailed account of the advance/retreat from Waterloo to Paris from William Silburn's books. There were some civilian casualties, but no numbers are given and it seems to have been mainly rape and pillage rather than murder.
At the moment there is a brief mention Waterloo Campaign#Invasion of France and the occupation of Paris (18 June – 7 July) of the problems. Wellington forbade his army to pillage (s:Nevilles general order) and issued the Malplaquet proclamation, but Blucher's Prussians considered the French enemies and according they plundered the populace and wantonly destroyed property during their advanced (Gifford 1817, p. 1494). It was particularly bad/notable at surrender of Avesnes (Gifford 1817, p. 1494).
Some Dutch-Belgian troops did pillage and to officers identified as taking part were dismissed from Wellington's army and sent them to the King of the Netherlands to punish them at his discression. (Siborne 1848, p. 703). It was not that the British soldiers were angels in comparison to their allies, its just they knew very well what Wellington thought of them ("scum of the earth") and knew with certainty that he would hang any of them who disobeyed his orders -- the veterans had also seen the difference in the behaviour of the Spanish and French population towards their invaders during the Peninsula War, so knew that Wellington's approach had positive affects for them.
There were also bound to have been incidental civilians deaths in the storming of some towns. One can not fire artillery rounds into an inhabited town and always miss civilians, but these are not systematically recorded in the general histories that I have read.
- Gifford, C. H. (1817), History of the Wars Occasioned by the French Revolution, from the Commencement of Hostilities in 1792, to the End of 1816: Embracing a Complete History of the Revolution, W. Lewis, p. 1494
- Siborne, William (1848), The Waterloo Campaign, 1815 (4th ed.), Westminster: A. Constable
However the Waterloo Campaign was not the only campaign in the Minor campaigns of 1815. The Civil War in La Vendée must have involved casualties (if only of the sort of tit-for-tat executions). In several places during the advance of the Army of the Upper Rhine (Austo-German Army), the Austrians inflicted reprisals on the civilian population for real or imagined attacks by civilians. For example General Rappe states in his memoirs "The enemy's General revenged himself for this defeat by devastation. The day after the battle he set on fire the village of Souffelweyersheim, under pretext that the peasants had fired on his troops. "This was not the fact, and the name of the Crown Prince of Württemberg will remain for ever sullied by an action which plunged a multitude of families into misery" (Rapp 1823, p. 370).
- Rapp, comte Jean (1823), Memoirs of General Count Rapp: First Aide-de-camp to Napoleon, H. Colburn and Company, pp. 359–
There were other similar instances elsewhere. Here is an extract from another contemporary account which details some attacks on civilians and justifies them using a common view of many supporters of the Coalition forces (after 25 years of near continuous war):
Some idea may be formed of the vast force of the allies, which entered France in this direction, when it is known that the Austrian force disposable on the Upper Loire, exclusive of the armies from Italy, amounted to 100,000 men.(M'Queen 1816, pp. 418–419) The advance of the main armies gave the numerous free corps assembled in Alsace and the Vosges mountains, opportunities to attack the line of the allied communication and carry off the baggage. But the continued advance of fresh troops, gave the allies an opportunity of organizing a sufficient force in moveable columns, which soon cleared the country of these marauders, who equally annoyed friend and foe; and whom the allies treated with great severity, as they exercised the greatest cruelties upon the allied troops who fell into their hands. In this difficult undertaking, the hardy and indefatigable Sons of the Don were employed; and whose perseverance soon ferreted out, and destroyed these troublesome bands.(M'Queen 1816, pp. 419) The disposition of a great part of the people of this part of France was, and had always been, most hostile and rancorous against the allies; and this hatred now showed itself in numerous instances, which brought down destruction on their heads. The villages of Hogentheim and Mülhausen gave the first-example of the most shocking excesses. In the former, a German soldier, after having his eyes put out, was hung up alive. The most dreadful punishment followed upon the instant. The aged, the women, and the children, suffered with the wicked perpetrators.(M'Queen 1816, p. 419) At Mülhausen, two soldiers were shot by a clergyman. His house was surrounded, and he was destroyed with it. Half a league from this, six huhlans inquired at a boy in a farm-house, the name of the next village—instead of answering, a man was shot from his horse. The boy was immediately cut down by the side of his mother. Similar was the conduct of the people in this part of France, and similar was their punishment. Wherever the allied troops met with resistance from the country people, every thing was destroyed. [I slightly reorders the wording in the next sentence (PBS):] Accounts from that quarter said:
Indeed, in numerous instances, the French people seem to have lost all sense of honour, justice, and regard for truth; and seemed to make these principles their sport (M'Queen 1816, pp. 419–420).
|
So yes there were civilian casualties but I do not know of any source that has tried to estimate how many. -- PBS (talk) 10:51, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
War of the Seventh Coalition and Hundred Days
Should these article really be the same? Uspzor (talk) 01:24, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
- For those who do not realise: the War of the Seventh Coalition currently redirects to here. Given the underdevelopment of this article, what is it that you would include (or if you prefer exclude) and what new information would you add to an article on the War of the Seventh Coalition that would not appear this article? -- PBS (talk) 09:27, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
- IMO the Hundred Days are about the government of Napoleon as a whole and the Seventh Coalition about the war itself. Uspzor (talk) 17:18, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
Does any one else supports this? What do you think PBS? AdjectivesAreBad (talk) 08:05, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
I have created a table of articles to show what exists and a possible way of view them:
I have not included in this list the articles to be found on Wikisource see:
Uspzor as you can see from this diagram apart from the this article (Hundred Days) we have three detailed articles on the military conflict that year, how do you envisage that these articles ought to be rearranged. For example I am not sure how the events in the article Abdication of Napoleon (1815) falls neatly into either "the government of Napoleon as a whole" or "the Seventh Coalition about the war itself". I am most interested to hear your views as at the moment I think that some further development of this article is needed to homogenise the sections "5 Waterloo Campaign", "6 Napoleon abdicates", "7 Prussians enter Paris", and "8 Other campaigns and wars". -- PBS (talk) 15:58, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
"Participants of the War of the Seventh Coalition" map
It seems to me that this map is wrong, at least about Louisiana. Can anybody sort that out? -- Falep (talk) 09:49, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
- All unassessed articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class Napoleonic era articles
- Napoleonic era task force articles
- C-Class France articles
- Mid-importance France articles
- All WikiProject France pages
- C-Class Germany articles
- Low-importance Germany articles
- WikiProject Germany articles
- Selected anniversaries (February 2006)
- Selected anniversaries (February 2007)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2009)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2010)
- Selected anniversaries (February 2011)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2012)
- Selected anniversaries (March 2014)