Jump to content

Talk:Washington State Route 530

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cyberbot II (talk | contribs) at 09:55, 17 January 2016 (Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Good articleWashington State Route 530 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 19, 2009Good article nomineeListed
WikiProject iconU.S. Roads: Washington GA‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
GAThis article has been rated as GA-class on the project's quality scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Locations
Note icon
This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
Note icon
This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
Note icon
This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
 
WikiProject iconUnited States: Washington GA‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
GAThis article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance).

Assessment

While the RD should be expanded, it's got the "big four". It's eligible for C-class - CL18:57, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RD and History expanded. B-Class. –CG 00:47, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Washington State Route 530/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Comments:

  1. "The 50.52-mile (81.30 km) long route runs northeast from an interchange with Interstate 5 in Washington (I-5)": Do not need to indicate Interstate 5 is in Washington as it is redundant. Also, a wikilink to Interstate 5 in Washington would help here.
  2. Can more descriptive information about the route be added to the lead?
  3. "as the name implies" is redundant.
  4. " the road aligns itself northeast" sounds awkward.
  5. "In Trafton, which is located in Arlington Heights, SR 530 passes a road that leads to the Jim Creek Naval Radio Station, a United States Navy facility; from Trafton, the road crosses a railroad track used by the BNSF Railway before crossing the North Fork of the Stillaguamish River in Cicero." should be broken into two sentences.
  6. "the North Fork" sounds colliqual.
  7. Shouldn't the information about the traffic counts at the I-5 interchange be mentioned earlier in the route description?
  8. Do not use "then" in describing progression of route.
  9. The sentence "The road then turned south to parallel railroad tracks belonging to the Great Northern Railroad and the South Fork of the Skagit River to Milltown, where SR 530 intersected Milltown Road, which would later interchange with I-5 to the east." sounds wordy.
  10. "The highway exited North Stanwood to enter Stanwood and intersected SR 532." should be rephrased to "The highway exited North Stanwood to enter Stanwood, where it intersected SR 532."
  11. Can more information about the physical surroundings the route passes through (i.e. woods, residential areas) be added to the route description?
  12. The sentence "A 1911 map shows a road from Conway traveled south to Stanwood and east past Arlington towards Oso and Darrington." sounds awkward.
  13. Dates should not be wikilinked.
  14. "which the highway follows" sounds redundant.
  15. "construction crews unearth remains", "unearth" should be "unearthed".
  16. I noticed a good deal of the recent history describes minor construction projects. We had a problem with this in the ACR of Washington State Route 31. Can you remove all the non-notable projects?

I am placing the article on hold. Dough4872 (talk) 15:41, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will pass the article. Dough4872 (talk) 17:57, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Washington State Route 530. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:55, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]