User talk:Simplulo

Welcome!

Hello, Simplulo, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Manual of Style
Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!

— Nathan ^(talk) 23:55, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jubileasimbolo.png

Hello, Simplulo. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Jubileasimbolo.png) was found at the following location: User:Simplulo. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 05:19, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Reputational Cascade.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Nimuaq (talk) 13:33, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Reputational Cascade concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Reputational Cascade, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:34, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Reputational Cascade was accepted

APOLOGIES - this article was prematurely accepted by me. I have reversed this and declined your article, due to the existence of an article on the same topic already published. Please see Reputational cascade. You can update that article with any appropriate material you have developed, but your submitted article can never be approved. -Dovid (talk) 05:37, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dovid, no article Reputational cascade exists--that merely redirects to Information cascade, where it is hardly mentioned. Are you suggesting that Reputational cascade should be a section of that article? Simplulo (talk) 09:10, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reputational Cascade, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Dovid (talk) 05:27, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Reputational Cascade (October 29)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Reputational Cascade.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Dovid (talk) 05:34, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Simplulo, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Reputational cascade vs Information cascade

Hi, Simplulo. I'm continuing this conversation in a new section for visual clarity.

Please note that if you respond to a comment on your talk page, the commenter may never know, because there is no automatic linking mechanism. Either leave a note on the original commenter's page, or use the {{Ping}} template (e.g., {{Ping|Dovid}} to get my attention). The Ping mechanism gives an alert to that user, and the user can then click a link to go back to the page. The funky code gets replaced by the username, linked to the user's page, followed by a colon, like so: @Dovid:

Now, to answer your question. The article you were trying to create would be termed a stub, i.e., a small article that while worthy of recognition for the subject, is not comprehensive. When such articles can really be seen as an aspect of the subject of a more complete article, the usual practice is to update the bigger article, and placing the content there. If there is already a small ==section== in the larger article, you would add your content there. If there is no dedicated section, add a dedicated section for the content and place it there. Either way, be careful to not lose any worthy existing content about the new subject from the original article.

Alternatively, you can expand your stub article to be a comprehensice article on its own. In that case, you might still have a small section about Reputational cascade in the Information cascade article, linking to the new article (after it gets published). The template {{Main|Reputational cascade}} would help you do that, and would appear like so at the top of the section:

-Dovid (talk) 20:19, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Power (social and political) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

' 710 (1917).</ref><ref>Hohfeld, Wesley. ''Fundamental Legal Conceptions''. Arthur Corbin, ed. (Westport, Conn., Greenwood Press (1978).</ref> Without requiring all right-holders' consent, such
Paradigm Press|location=Chicago|isbn=0-9728196-4-9|pages=24|edition=2nd pr.}} The examples given (self governing communities, radical labour unions, popular militias reflect the Idea/Economics/

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:07, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Reputational Cascade concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Reputational Cascade, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Reputational Cascade concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Reputational Cascade, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Reputational Cascade

Hello Simplulo. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Reputational Cascade".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Reputational Cascade}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 11:40, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of Magical Negro occurrences in fiction, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 21:01, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]