User talk:Samuraionetwothree

Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).== Your submission at Articles for creation: Chris Beale Chester (January 9) ==

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chris Beale Chester and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:31, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Samuraionetwothree, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:31, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Chris Beale Chester

Hello, Samuraionetwothree. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Chris Beale Chester".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 09:01, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chris Beale

The article Chris Beale has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Seemingly different content to that deleted in September at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Beale, but still fails WP:NMUSIC with the leaderlive.co.uk article being "publications where the musician or ensemble talks about themselves".

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. McGeddon (talk) 20:23, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chris Beale for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris Beale is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Beale (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. McGeddon (talk) 20:00, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Samuraionetwothree (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Requesting an IP address block exemption, because (Really confused as to why my messages have been ignored. And now my IP address has been blocked??? I have supplied a reliable source for the information. But now my whole account has been blocked, as i am apparently a web host provider? Can you explain what is going on, so i am able to fix this issue please). Samuraionetwothree (talk) 00:45, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

See below. Huon (talk) 01:41, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Chris Beale

Chris Beale is a Chester-UK based music producer. supported by BBC Introducing.

Chris also owns the infamous Mashup Events. And has headlined a number of Europian festivals, such as Wakestock and No Stress Festival.

^[1]

References

^ http://www.chesterchronicle.co.uk/whats-on/music-nightlife-news/chester-music-producer-chris-beale-10590271

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Samuraionetwothree (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Requesting an IP address block exemption, because (Why has my IP been blocked??? I have supplied a reliable source above. And have done nothing wrong?). Samuraionetwothree (talk) 00:42, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I see no reason to grant IP block exemption to this account. Please provide the exact block message; then we can look into the causes of the IP's block. Huon (talk) 01:41, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Samuraionetwothree (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi. The exact block message has disappeared now. However it basically said you blocked it because it was something to do with a host server. To which i figured out, was because i linked the BBC Introducing page link on here. Without understanding it was against rules. However you did not give the opportunity to simply delete it. When the page had been confirmed, and was linked and live with BBC's website. And all fine. So it was not a big violation, it was a very basic mistake, as i thought the BBC website would be a great reliable source. However you must have considered it to be advertising. Even though it only had information from Wiki on its page! So i edited the information, to only include the Chronicle as a reliable source, which was confirmed as fine. So i really dont understand how something so insignificant can cause a block from your website! Can you please help me to unblock now so the information can be live again, and sent over to BBC? Samuraionetwothree (talk) 11:15, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Technical decline as you have been editing today, and so it appears you are not currently blocked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:01, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

No, linking to that isn't why your IP was blocked. Your IP was blocked because it was a webhost server; editing from such servers is generally not allowed. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 22:48, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So if you're not seeing a block message now, does that mean you are not blocked and can edit? Also "host server" blocks are nothing to do with any content you added - they're related to the IP address you're using to edit from. So please don't try to guess at why you might be blocked - if you are still blocked, just tell us the message you get when you try to edit. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:24, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chris beale

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Chris beale, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://deletionpedia.org/en/Chris_Beale.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:54, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I moved Chris beale to Chris Beale to correct the capitalization, and then I saw it was pretty much identical to a previous version that you created on December 8 and which was deleted on December 18 as a result of this discussion - and so I have deleted it in accordance with Speedy Deletion WP:G4. Please do not recreate the article again unless you can provide multiple independent reliable sources (see WP:RS) that provide evidence that this person satisfies Wikipedia's WP:NMUSIC notability requirements. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:12, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Samuraionetwothree (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

When you say multiple, how many do you mean? Here are three, if that's enough? Two of the areas main news papers, and the cities main night-club /// http://www.chesterchronicle.co.uk/whats-on/music-nightlife-news/chester-music-producer-chris-beale-10590271 /// http://m.leaderlive.co.uk/mobile/mnews/155839/broughton-man-goes-from-trucks-to-turntables.aspx#comment_view /// http://www.mashupevents.net/#!chris-beale/c1jnm /// If this is not enough, please let me know how many more are needed.

Decline reason:

This account is not blocked. Please do not abuse the unblock template. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 23:49, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi, it's my bedtime now, but I'll reply tomorrow. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 00:12, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Good morning. The problem is not just the number of sources you are providing, it is the nature of them and whether or not they convey sufficient notability. The key is the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Beale (2nd nomination), which essentially concluded that this is a local musician of local interest only, and as such does not meet the requirements of WP:NMUSIC.
The "BBC Introducing" coverage seems the best so far, but the earlier deletion nomination at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Beale in September pointed out that "the BBC Introducing program is specifically intended to introduce unknown talent. But a single airplay on that program does not confer the required notability".
Recreating the same article with only local sources is not going to change all that. What you'd need to do is find non-local sources that demonstrate notability beyond just the local area and beyond his "BBC Introducing" coverage - has he been covered in any depth by any national publications, any leading music publications, etc? If you can't do that and can only recreate the same article using only those local sources, then the deletion consensus will still be binding and the article would be deleted again according to WP:G4.
Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:42, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is This Source Enough?

Hi again,

Can you confirm if this supplied source is ok?

Resident Advisor is noted on Wikipedia, as an international artist directory. So i presume this information would be a sufficient resource of information for the Chris Beale information page on Wiki?

Source: ^[1]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chris Beale

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Chris Beale, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Valenciano (talk) 12:54, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Someone please help!

Ok so now the source has been accepted (at last)

But you still want it deleted because its a repeat post? And promoting rather than encyclopedic?

So should i ask the source to re-word the article?

What do i need to do to make it encyclopedic, and not promotional please? I do not understand....

Thanks

Personally I'd advise you to find a different topic to write about, one that clearly meets Wikipedia's standards of notability as laid out at WP:N and, in greater detail, WP:MUSIC. I cannot tell where that source might have been "accepted", but I see no indication that it should be considered reliable. If it would reword its coverage of Beale at your urging, that's pretty much a red flag. Beale simply does not qualify for an enycylopedia article at this time. Huon (talk) 10:55, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chris has broken a Guinness World record. This is an iconic achievement alone. Let alone the fact he has industry recognition from the BBC. This is direct proof from reliable sources that he is worthy of an encyclopedic article. I have been following your instruction for close to 12 months now. And have done EVERYTHING to meet your criteria. And now you say it can not be done?

There were two separate recent deletion discussions on articles on Beale, and both concluded that Beale currently is not notable enough to be the subject of a Wikipedia article. So yes, I think that's a pretty strong indication that we cannot have an article on Beale. Huon (talk) 10:31, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong. I was told the sources were not good enough. That is why i have spent so much time following your absurdly difficult hurdles. You are the only website that BBC can accept. And i have seen several artists that have articles on here, that do not contain anything encyclopedic worthy. So this proves to be more a case of you being selective about it now. The article must be made, so i can link it with Musicbrainz, to complete a BBC website. That has been on hold for 12 months now. So please advise what to do.

"Wrong"? How so? Are you saying there were not two deletion discussions which found Chris Beale not notable enough for an article, despite the links I gave above? Since Wikipedia measures notability by the amount of coverage in reliable third-party sources that a subject has received, "there are not enough sources" and "he is not notable enough to be the subject of an article" are equivalent statements.

There may well be other problematic articles that should be improved or deleted; that is no reason to allow one more article on an ineligible subject. See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS.

I have no idea how the BBC is relevant here, but Wikipedia articles are not created merely to serve as input for something else. I get the impression that improving the encyclopedia is not your purpose here. Huon (talk) 20:09, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Are you saying that there have not been indications that it was not allowed due to the source not being reliable enough? And my clear indication i would follow anything i was asked to do? I just want help to know what else needs doing for this to be done. There are plenty of artists on here, so there simply must be a way.

My soul purpose is to make sure people can find out about Chris. Which is precisely what Wiki is designed for. I want to use Wiki for its intention.

The BBC is relevant, because they also use Wiki, exclusively. And as an official artist, Chris has a page on their website, and the text information can STRICTLY only come from Wiki.

Britain's biggest broadcasting company also uses Wiki, for good reason to Wiki too.

I just want to know what more do you need. If its not worthy of an encyclopedic article, when he holds a world record, and major industry recognition for his contribution to the industry?

^ http://www.residentadvisor.net/dj/chrisbeale-uk/biography

[1] ttp://www.chesterchronicle.co.uk/whats-on/music-nightlife-news/chester-music-producer-chris-beale-10590271

[2] ttp://www.residentadvisor.net/dj/chrisbeale-uk/biography

[1]

[1]