User talk:OCCUSpriest

Let me guess, another sockpuppet of dePaulo is going to post a rant on a page, claiming slander. Fine...keep deleting and we'll keep adding the truth. The reason we left the church and started our own is because of defrocked perverts like him. The truth about this pervert's will continue to be posted until his article is removed from Wiki. He can blame himself.---- — Preceding unsigned comment added by OCCUSpriest (talk • contribs)

Since it sounds like you have a conflict of interest or can otherwise not maintain neutral point of view, I strongly suggest you refrain from editing Craig J. N. de Paulo.

Adding unsourced material to his article violates our policies on biographies of living people; such unsourced material can and will be quickly removed. The burden of proof is on the editor adding material to show that it is supported by reliable sources—and ideally secondary sources that are independent of the subject. —C.Fred (talk) 20:09, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a serious problem, and I request that the IP address be traced since even these statements on User talk:OCCUSpriest are slanderous and criminal offenses, demonstrating cyber-bullying, too. OCCUSpriest refers to the subject as a pervert. This wiki user and the IP address should be blocked from editing.2601:45:8001:A70F:4C6B:623E:4102:5B32 (talk) 20:14, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To the user above: the IP address would only be traced to establish if other accounts are being used by this person. In absence of evidence of abuse of multiple accounts, it won't be. I would also be careful suggesting legal repercussions to this editor's conduct. Wikipedia has a strict policy of no legal threats to prevent the chilling effect caused by off-Wiki legal action or the threat thereof. Continued legal threats could result in your IP address being blocked. That said, as I noted above, OCCUSpriest is required to follow on-Wikipedia policies like BLP. —C.Fred (talk) 20:27, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear C.Fred, thank you for your kind assistance. I was simply trying to point out that this is unfair. very grateful, 2601:45:8001:A70F:4C6B:623E:4102:5B32 (talk) 20:33, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Since you are clearly personally and emotionally involved with de Paulo, and your only objective is to get his wikipedia page removed, as evidenced by your many conspiratorial statements, you can be blocked as a user. You might want to read these policies carefully: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Templates JustTryintobeJust (talk) 15:28, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]