Jump to content

Generalised beam theory

Edit links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ozob (talk | contribs) at 21:19, 12 March 2016. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

  • Comment: Not entirely certain of its notability but this will also still need any further available in-depth third-party sources overall. SwisterTwister talk 07:50, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Comment: In addition to notability concerns, the article does not provide enough technical detail for the target audience. For example, what is ζ? It's never defined, and I can't figure it out from the diagrams. The situations to which GBT is supposed to apply are never made explicit beyond "thin-walled". (Perhaps that's jargon that I don't know, since I don't do fluid mechanics, but even so, it should be made more explicit.) When the article says that only three non-null stress components are necessary, I consequently have no way of knowing if that's accurate or not.

    My advice to the authors is: Pretend you are writing a survey for undergraduates. You must be able to state clearly what the problem of interest is, and you should give real-world examples of where this problem arises. Then you must explain why the techniques you're discussing are relevant. You should state which situations these techniques apply to and what results they provide. All of this must be done with enough detail that the reader (even an undergraduate) can get a surface understanding of the techniques involved and is able to determine whether they're relevant to their own work. Ozob (talk) 21:19, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

GBT comes from "Generalised Beam Theory" and is the most complete and dissiminated beam theory ever formulated and extensively validated. Its origin is due to Richard Schardt (1966), a German Scientist from the University of Darmstadt. Since then many other authors have extended the initial (first-order elastic) GBT formulations developed by Schardt and his co-workers[1][2]. However, it is fair to say that a vast majority of the most advanced/complete (in order to predict as close as possible the real behaviour (collapse and post-collapse) of a structural member) formulations and applications of GBT have been developed by the research group headed by Dinar Camotim, a full professor from the University of Lisbon, Portugal, since the beginning of the 21st century [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] (please follow the website of his research group for information on publications and available software).

The theory can be applied without restrictions to any prismatic thin-walled structural member exhibiting straight or curved axial axis (any loading, any cross-section geometry, any boundary conditions), and it is a very promising alternative to the powerful Finite Element Method employing 2D or 3D FEs to predict the member structural behaviour.

GBT has already been widely recognised as a powerful, versatile, elegant and efficient approach to analyse thin-walled members and structural systems. The elegance and efficiency arise mostly from its rather unique modal nature – the displacement field is expressed as a linear combination of cross-section deformation modes whose amplitudes vary continuously along the member length (x axis) - see Figures 2-3. Due to GBT assumptions inherent to a thin-walled member, only 3 non-null stress components are considered in the formulations (see Fig. 1).

Membrane displacement field (i.e., in the cross-section mid-surface): GBT membrane displacement field

The GBT modal nature makes it possible to (i) acquire in-depth knowledge on the mechanics of the thin-walled member behaviour and (ii) judiciously exclude, from subsequent similar GBT analyses, those deformation modes found to play no (or negligible) role in the particular behaviour under scrutiny, thus further reducing the number of d.o.f. involved in a GBT analysis (i.e., increasing its computational efficiency). GBT has already extensively prooved its potential regarding (1) deep understanding of the structural behaviour under analysis as well as (2) computational efficiency (i.e., number of degrees of freedom involved in the analysis) - results and a more detailed insight of GBT-based inelastic analyses are available online (check out works from Dinar Camotim, Nuno Silvestre, Pedro B. Dinis, Rodrigo Gonçalves, Cilmar Basaglia, Rui Bebiano, Nuno Silva and Miguel Abambres).

The investigation, application and dissemination of GBT will certainly last during many more years.

Gbt3

Illustration of GBT membrane displacement field

References

  1. ^ Schardt, Richard (1994). "Generalised Beam Theory - an adequate method for coupled stability problems". Thin-Walled Strcutures. 19 (2–4): 161–180.
  2. ^ Davies, JM (2000). "Recent research advances in cold-formed steel structures". Journal of Constructional Steel Research. 55 (1–3): 267–288.
  3. ^ Silvestre, N; Camotim, D (2002). "Second-order generalised beam theory for arbitrary orthotropic materials". Thin-Walled Strcutures. 40 (9): 791–820.
  4. ^ Borges Dinis, P; Camotim, D; Silvestre, N (2006). "GBT formulation to analyse the buckling behaviour of thin-walled members with arbitrarily 'branched'open cross-sections". Thin-Walled Strcutures. 44 (1): 20–38.
  5. ^ Camotim, D; Basaglia, C; Silvestre, N (2010). "GBT buckling analysis of thin-walled steel frames: a state-of-the-art report". Thin-Walled Strcutures. 48 (10): 726–743.
  6. ^ Abambres, M; Camotim, D; Silvestre, N (2014). "GBT-based elastic–plastic post-buckling analysis of stainless steel thin-walled members". Thin-Walled Strcutures. 83 (October): 85–102.
  7. ^ Abambres, M; Camotim, D; Silvestre, N; Rasmussen, KJR (2014). "GBT-based structural analysis of elastic–plastic thin-walled members". Computers & Structures. 136 (May): 1–23.
  8. ^ Bebiano, R; Gonçalves, R; Camotim, D (2015). "A cross-section analysis procedure to rationalise and automate the performance of GBT-based structural analyses". Thin-Walled Strcutures. 92 (July): 29–47.
  9. ^ Gonçalves, R; Camotim, D (2016). "GBT deformation modes for curved thin-walled cross-sections based on a mid-line polygonal approximation". Thin-Walled Strcutures (January). {{cite journal}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1= (help)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Generalised_beam_theory&oldid=709749441"