Talk:Antiphospholipid syndrome

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Physiology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to blood.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Medicine: Hematology-oncology / Neurology Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Hematology-oncology task force.
	This article is supported by the Neurology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Women's Health Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Antiphospholipid syndrome.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Rename article

The suggestion is made in this article that the anti phospholipid syndrome is caused by auto antibodies directed against negatively charged phospholipids on the cell/platelet surface. However for almost 15 years it is known that most of the antibodies in this syndrome are directed against proteins that bind negatively charged phospholipids such as prothrombin and beta-2-glycoprotein-1. It is the binding of antibodies to coagulation proteins that causes altered coagulation processes not the binding of antibodies against negatively charged phospholipids.

I suggest to change the article to correct this misunderstanding. Bio2mancer 24 june 2006.

{{sofixit}} JFW | T@lk 20:58, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sapporo criteria

We should mention the Sapporo criteria: PMID 10403256 . JFW | T@lk 20:58, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And a recent amendment: PMID 16420554 . JFW | T@lk 20:59, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Recent review

A recent systematic review on the treatment shows how little we actually know about optimal treatment for this: PMID 16507806. JFW | T@lk 21:01, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, a new study in the New England Journal of Medicine -- Kaandorp SP et al, N Engl J Med 362;17p1586–1596 shows no benefit of aspirin + LMWH over placebo -- in women with recurrent miscarriage -- and the accompanying editorial states that although inherited thrombophilia is associated with miscarriage, anticoagulants in this indication don't help. We know less than we think!

Page has massive changes

Since 07 NOV 06...actually making this page very inaccurate. Please revert back to previous revision before 07 NOV 06. Tried to get the categories back in. Hopefully I did it right.eyz 00:10, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Typo

Changed a typo (phosphotidylserine to Phosphatidylserine). Rage italic 15:54, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

APSFA Page

Actaully that page is cited and is HONCode certifed. Very few sites can say that. It has a bio. upon request.eyz 17:53, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

APSCORE

APSCORE is no longer functioning due to lack of funding from the CDC and NIH. Link Removed. eyz

Nature of antibodies

Some antibodies are more aborto/thrombogenic than others PMID 17440049 JFW | T@lk 06:42, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blood!

doi:10.1182/blood-2007-12-129627 - how we diagnose APS. JFW | T@lk 17:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Source

Is House MD a reliable and authentic source? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.208.112.205 (talk) 20:15, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely not. House MD is entertainment, not a reliable source for anything.Wzrd1 (talk) 17:53, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review

doi:10.1182/blood-2012-03-378646 the relevance of anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies. JFW | T@lk 20:57, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

NEJM mechanisms of disease: doi:10.1056/NEJMra1112830 JFW | T@lk 16:09, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Historical review in Br J Haem doi:10.1111/bjh.12848 JFW | T@lk 18:59, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Laboratory technique

doi:10.1111/jth.12537 ISTH JFW | T@lk 07:17, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sentence

Hi. In the section under the subsubhead 2.1, Lupus anticoagulant, we currently begin the second paragraph thus: "Distinguishing a lupus antibody from a specific coagulation factor inhibitor (eg: Factor VIII)." This is not a sentence and does not make sense on its own. I'd fix it if I was sure how to without distorting the intended sense, but I'm not. (I was tempted to weld it into the next sentence but I'm not 100% certain that works - or was it like a yet another subhead perhaps??) Can someone who can see the sense of the whole thing please sort it out? Thanks and best wishes, DBaK (talk) 11:21, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, though it's likely the whole section (and many others) should be drastically cut back; encyclopedias don't normally, and shouldn't, give specific diagnostic criteria and protocols - especially when these vary from place to place. Grothmag (talk) 00:13, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]