Talk:Obfuscation
Media Unassessed | |||||||||||||||||
|
Sociology Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
Intent
Is Obfuscation always done intentionally ?
Yes
My understanding is that whenever obfuscation is referring to an unintentional behavior, it comes with a pejorative connotation. --Joannes Vermorel (talk) 19:06, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
Neutral POV
It is vital that such a project keeps a neutral point of view in its content. I literally spit out my tea laughing whist reading "(also see Internal Revenue Code)", but such humorous jabs will be deleted from this article. Xoxxixxox (talk) 23:08, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
Usage in enterprise software?
At Lokad.com (disclaimer: I am working for this company), we are routinely using obfuscation for big enterprise clients. The process is detailed at http://www.lokad.com/obfuscation.ashx . In short, obfuscation removes most of the need for our clients to actually trust Lokad as a 3rd party forecasting component. Such a usage might be worth of inclusion within the article. --Joannes Vermorel (talk) 19:03, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
Reference Issue
- 4 relating to Mark Twain's, Fenimore Cooper's Literary Offenses, goes nowhere but to a dead line. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deepsean666 (talk • contribs) 19:47, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
It could go here instead: http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/3172 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deepsean666 (talk • contribs) 19:50, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
White-box Cryptography redirect loop
Hi
White-box cryptography redirects to this page, and this page also has a link to white-box cryptography. This creates a potentially confusing redirect loop. Can we please fix this?