Jump to content

User talk:66.77.174.126

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Omicronpersei8 (talk | contribs) at 23:57, 24 August 2006 (Warning user with {{blank1-n}} using VandalSniper.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

ARMA

Since you have edited the section of the ARMA article dealing with the reviews of John Clements' books I will ask this question to you. Why are the books of John Clements allowed to be such a big issue in an article about the ARMA orgainzation? If a director of NASA wrote a book would the reviews of the book be an issue discussed in the article about NASA? Likewise, if a director of the CIA wrote a book would the reviews of the book be an issue discussed in the article about the CIA? I think all of the dicussions about Clements' books should be removed from the ARMA article. If this makes sense to you then I would ask that you remove that marterial. Ran Pleasant 5:23 pm, 22 August 2006

Text Books

Are you saying that these books are not ARMA's textbooks? If the material in the books is valid, it should be able to stand up to scrutiny in a public forum such as this. It's my understanding that these texts are part of the ARMA culture and are prominently displayed on the group's website. The material within the text does provide a solid point of factual debate and I think it is very relevant. It is much better than any criticisms based on some idealized truth or hearsay in any respect.

I am not sure I buy your argument that John Clements and ARMA are two unrelated topics. I have moved the book reviews and I'll keep editing to keep the article as fair as I can, but that is a two way street.

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to Joseph Swetnam. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 23:57, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]