Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Field & Stream (disambiguation)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:TWODABS. Only has two topics and one of them is primary already... Nohomersryan (talk) 23:20, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There is also the very similar Fields and Streams which may confuse readers. The magazine may be at the primary page, as it was created first, as it seems to be misplaced. Page view statistics for both are similar (especially significant bearing in mind many people wanting the retailer's article end up at the magazine by default, inflating the statistics. A Google search for 'Field & Stream magazine' receives over 8 million hits, but for the retailer, there are over 12 million hits. The magazine should be moved to Field & Stream (magazine) and the dab kept to show readers the three possible pages they may be looking for. Boleyn (talk) 08:43, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Clarityfiend added one more blue link and I used Dabfix and found 4 more valid entries. Were other entries looked for WP:BEFORE nomination? Boleyn (talk) 08:52, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My goose is cooked. Sure, withdraw the nomination. But what's Dabfix? Might be useful in the future. Nohomersryan (talk) 23:45, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nohomersryan, [1] dabfix will tell you if there are missing entries, it's really useful. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 15:56, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as this is convincing enough. SwisterTwister talk 06:14, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]