User talk:Coffee

User:Chetblong/bar

This is Coffee's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, then place {{Talkback|your username}} on my talk.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|Coffee}} on your talk.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by .

Another sockpuppet

Please also block https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Cezaroanyad, which has a similar name with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Cézárocskácska, confirmed sockpuppet of User:Stubes99.

Cezaroanyad edited a talk page comment made by Cézárocskácska yesterday, so it should be blocked per WP:DUCK. Thanks in advance for your help 86.126.46.47 (talk)

Fannie Lou Hamer

I noticed that you placed pending changes protection on this article on Mardh 4, 2016. I request that you remove this protection. It was unnecessary in the first place; there had been only one case of unambiguous vandalism (section blanking) for all of 2016 prior to placing that protection, and that was reverted in one minute by ClueBot. Since that time, there has been only one case of unambiguous vandalism, again section blanking, again corrected by ClueBot in one minute. The other three reversions in the three month period, other than content reversions) are easily classified as test edits. And those were quickly caught by page watcher. This article attracts less vandalism than most African-American Civil Rights Movement articles, but more than the average number of edits by first time editors who genuinely wish to contribute, and whose edits can in no way be considered vandalism. The form of protection you applied is counter-productive to growing the encyclopedia. Please remove. — Neonorange (talk) 19:31, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Intelligent Haunting

I saw that you closed the AFD for Intelligent Haunting and deleted the article. I had a couple ideas for re-writing it, and I was wondering if you'd be kind enough to restore it (and its talk page) to my userspace at User:ONUnicorn/Intelligent Haunting. I probably won't work on it much until late this summer, after the bar exam, but I'd like to re-write it after that. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 23:51, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of countries by GDP (nominal)

Hi Coffee, could you please restore the pending changes protection for the list? It had just expired and vandalism resumed almost immediately. This list is a perpetual vandal magnet and has been protected dozens of times. I think permanent protection is necessary. Thanks, -Zanhe (talk) 17:03, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

YAY!!!

	THE BEST ADMIN EVER AWARD
	haha!!! Thanks For Getting Rid Of I WILL RULE WIKIPEDIA BLOCKING THE USER HE/SHE WAS EVIL ON THE WIKI! and a bad influence thank you very much i should become a admin one day! ^_^ Note:Thats me in the middle lol Ninja Nonsense Shinobu (talk) 05:58, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/January 1 in India

These are now merged and can be deleted. I have tagged them with speedy deletion templates, but as you are familiar with them I though I would give you a bell as well. Cheers AIRcorn (talk) 21:47, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ASIS Boats

Hello Coffee,

You deleted an article I wrote for being advertising. Can you please give me some pointers to decrease advertisement in the article? I would like to submit it again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lover of Food and Fun (talk • contribs) 08:40, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

netto uyoku

Why did you delete netto youku? I wrote it with references.

There are also articles in French wikipedia and Japanese wikipedia about netto youku.

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netto_uyoku https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%83%8D%E3%83%83%E3%83%88%E5%8F%B3%E7%BF%BC

Please answer me.

@Veri1tas: I clicked the wrong explanation while deleting the page, the correct explanation is for copyright violations (using direct and copied phrasing from other online sources that do not share our copyright terms). — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 08:52, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Millennials

Did you read the discussion here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection#Millennials

Because we are not supposed to protect a page when the reason given isn't a valid one based on solid evidence of edit warring.

I took the time to go through the evidence and not one edit crossed the bright line. Did you look at any of it? Thank you.

2606:6000:610A:9000:C14E:CD87:51E9:64C0 (talk) 00:31, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]