User talk:Coffee

This user is more awesome than you.

Another sockpuppet

Please also block https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Cezaroanyad, which has a similar name with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Cézárocskácska, confirmed sockpuppet of User:Stubes99.

Cezaroanyad edited a talk page comment made by Cézárocskácska yesterday, so it should be blocked per WP:DUCK. Thanks in advance for your help 86.126.46.47 (talk)

List of countries by GDP (nominal)

Hi Coffee, could you please restore the pending changes protection for the list? It had just expired and vandalism resumed almost immediately. This list is a perpetual vandal magnet and has been protected dozens of times. I think permanent protection is necessary. Thanks, -Zanhe (talk) 17:03, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

YAY!!!

	THE BEST ADMIN EVER AWARD
	haha!!! Thanks For Getting Rid Of I WILL RULE WIKIPEDIA BLOCKING THE USER HE/SHE WAS EVIL ON THE WIKI! and a bad influence thank you very much i should become a admin one day! ^_^ Note:Thats me in the middle lol Ninja Nonsense Shinobu (talk) 05:58, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/January 1 in India

These are now merged and can be deleted. I have tagged them with speedy deletion templates, but as you are familiar with them I though I would give you a bell as well. Cheers AIRcorn (talk) 21:47, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

ASIS Boats

Hello Coffee,

You deleted an article I wrote for being advertising. Can you please give me some pointers to decrease advertisement in the article? I would like to submit it again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lover of Food and Fun (talk • contribs) 08:40, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

netto uyoku

Why did you delete netto youku? I wrote it with references.

There are also articles in French wikipedia and Japanese wikipedia about netto youku.

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netto_uyoku https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%83%8D%E3%83%83%E3%83%88%E5%8F%B3%E7%BF%BC

Please answer me.

@Veri1tas: I clicked the wrong explanation while deleting the page, the correct explanation is for copyright violations (using direct and copied phrasing from other online sources that do not share our copyright terms). — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 08:52, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Millennials

Did you read the discussion here? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection#Millennials

Because we are not supposed to protect a page when the reason given isn't a valid one based on solid evidence of edit warring.

I took the time to go through the evidence presented and not one edit crossed the bright line. Did you look at any of it before protecting the page further? Thank you.

2606:6000:610A:9000:C14E:CD87:51E9:64C0 (talk) 00:33, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Hey

I heard you got out of the military.--v/r - TP 06:17, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

• TParis: Indeed, I medically retired at 100% after 7 years of active duty... just about two months ago. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 06:20, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
  • No shit? Not a bad deal. At least you're not having to start course 15.--v/r - TP 06:21, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
    • TParis: Haha very true... so glad I didn't have to go through those before I got out. Now I'm moving to Colorado, where I can hopefully get some good medical care. Set for life right now, but I'll likely use my GI Bill in the next few years. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 06:23, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
      • Just finished Set A, myself. Put on TSgt last year and then this came out before I could manage to get myself shipped off to NCOA.--v/r - TP 06:26, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
        • That sucks haha... but congrats on getting TSgt. Sadly I was only able to make it to SSgt before getting retired. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 06:28, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Request

Hi Coffee - Now that the IP has been rangeblocked, do you mind setting the protection on my talk page to Edit=Allow all users for me? Move protection can obviously stay the same ;-). Thanks -- ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:44, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Looks like Widr got to it before I could! — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 06:47, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Kashibai

Hello, I'm just wondering what your reason was for protecting this article for a week? There have only been 8 edits to the article within a month. I agree there is some dispute going on but it isn't affecting the article particularly - discussion is on going on the talk page and in other places. This feels a very heavy handed approach to a content issue.. ツStacey (talk) 10:47, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Staceydolxx: The reason behind protecting the page for that long is that in my experience (and I have nearly a decade of doing this under my belt) it tends to force the editors to reach a compromise sooner as neither part in an edit war wants a page to not be editable for that long. There's no point to protecting it for a shorter period of time if we expect the war to continue, so instead we protect it for a longer period of time and ensure a higher chance of the dispute being resolved earlier. Besides there is a fairly easy way for us to update the page if need be, as editors can use {{edit protected}} if something must be edited during the protection period. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:51, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Darius Allen

Hello,

I just received a message stating that my Darius Allen article was immediately deleted for violating the guidelines but the message did not specify which guideline it violated. I reviewed the list of policies and was unable to locate anything which would justify its deletion, especially so quickly. Could you please specify which part of the guidelines it violates so that I can make the appropriate corrections?

Thank you,

Zurich899