User talk:88.105.68.243
Appearance
Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Ian.thomson (talk) 09:24, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- See WP:AGF. If you truly believe that Wikipedia itself is serving any sort of agenda that you disagree with, you are only wasting your time posting here. Ian.thomson (talk) 09:24, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Feminism, you may be blocked from editing. Once again, you need to actually cite professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources instead of spouting off your little conspiracy theories. Ian.thomson (talk) 14:22, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- There we go, just thought I'd highlight your incivility and refusal to assume good faith. That you are an admin is actually quite scary. You like using your blocks as political weapons, you are adverse to other opinions and you have a serious issue with civility. Before firing off any more unrelated links, perhaps work on your own character flaws?
- This is a conspiracy theory, unless you can produce some rather good professionally-published mainstream academic sources supporting the claim that feminism was somehow responsible for significant deaths during WWI. Ian.thomson (talk) 14:57, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- [1] Wikipedia itself. The White Feather Campaign to shame men into going off to die in the trenches. Oh look, and it's cited too. Heavily. But that wasn't in doubt, because dismissing something as a "conspiracy theory" because it affronts the populist line isn't something I am easily discouraged by.
- This is a conspiracy theory, unless you can produce some rather good professionally-published mainstream academic sources supporting the claim that feminism was somehow responsible for significant deaths during WWI. Ian.thomson (talk) 14:57, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- There we go, just thought I'd highlight your incivility and refusal to assume good faith. That you are an admin is actually quite scary. You like using your blocks as political weapons, you are adverse to other opinions and you have a serious issue with civility. Before firing off any more unrelated links, perhaps work on your own character flaws?
May 2016
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Acroterion (talk) 16:46, 3 May 2016 (UTC)- If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |