Jump to content

User talk:Yanksox/archive8

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< User talk:Yanksox

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Werdnabot (talk | contribs) at 12:57, 28 August 2006 (Automated Archival of 6 sections with User:Werdnabot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Thanks for the welcome.

Thaks for saying hello! I'm quickly learning all the ins and outs of contributing, mostly making minor edits here and there as I come across them. Good to hear a greeting. I actually got stumped recently: I created a page for an old video game, Rome: Pathway to Power. I've inserted an infobox, except that it doesn't look particularly infoboxy. I've checked and double-checked everything, and it all looks good to me, and yet: no infobox. Any idea why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Porlob (talk • contribs)

Deleted request for Joep_Gommers

Dear Sir, I see that you objected to my page about my friend Joep Gommers (Joep_Gommers), could you please post your comments so i can revise my story about him. It's difficult to say how to improve if you don't mention it. He really is of great value for his community and especially Hackerdom, thanks for the reaction. Reply to me at my talk page is fine. Sincerley, Marc

your blocking

you have been inappropriate in some of your interactions I see in the people you have blocked. I am reporting this to an adminn. good day sir —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.149.204.158 (talk • contribs) .

Troll. Tyrenius 21:59, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Could you delete this page?

Could you please delete this page for me: User:Legolost/Userboxes I stuffed something up and accidently created this page, cheers -- Lego@lost 06:32, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sysop recall cat.

Based on your comments regarding the activity seen over the past few days I thought I'd drop you a line re my post here on the process. Look forward to your thoughts, Kia Kaha - Glen 06:48, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Admin recall

Here's my suggestion.[1]. Tyrenius 19:00, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please reconsider RPP for PGA...

Thanks! Lavieenrose 10 August 2006.

userpage

Nice user page. :) --Always Gotta Keep It Real, Cute 1 4 u 04:13, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Toronto Star

I am the principal author of the Toronto Star article. After many weeks, we finally reached a consensus -- only to be confronted with some reversions that undid much of the hard work. I see you have reverted (re-reverted?) some of these. I have completed the task, with a few more minor edits. Thanks for any assiatance you can offer in seeing this through.

google

480,000 references is nothing to scoff at. And who deleted my pic?Courtney Akins 03:36, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks

Thanks so much for voting, Yanksox!
Thanks so much for your support vote on my request for adminship! With a final vote count of (82/5/0), it succeeded, and I'm now an administrator! I am thrilled with the overwhelming positive support from the community, and sincerely thank you once again for taking your time to voice your opinion. Feel free to contact me with any comments/suggestions in the future!
—Mets501 (talk) 03:54, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Frank Coldheart

Hello Yanksox,

I have noticed that you have deleted the article I have just posted on Frank Coldheart. I believe this young author will be soon recognised by most people as I have personally read his book and can confirm that there is substance. My name is Paul Richardson and I was Director of the Oxford International Centre for Publishing Studies at Oxford Brookes University in the UK until 2004. I understand that the article does not meet your criteria, however, I believe that it makes some sense to inform people about authors that are not necessarily big at the time of entering Wikipedia.

I would appreciate your view.

Regards

Frank Coldheart

I accept that this author is still unknown to the big audience, however, I don't understand why you classify the article as nonsensical. I can rephrase the article if you can give me more specific guidance as to the criteria required.

Thanks

What is your definition of nonsense? I am a bit baffled, and it is not about getting Frank known but about spreading information that is valuable for Wikipedian readers


Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion#Portal:Orkney

A portal created recently by Mallimak (talk · contribs) - the Orkney Portal - has been nominated for deletion. If you wish to take part in the discussion please contribute at:

Thanks. --Mais oui! 08:36, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

August Esperanza Newsletter

Program Feature: To-Do List
The Esperanza To-Do List is a place where you may list any request, big or small, for assistance. If you need help with archiving your usertalk, for example, all you need to do is list it here and somebody will help you out. Likewise, if you need help with some area of editing on Wikipedia, list it here! Again, any matter, trivial or not, can be placed on this page. However, all matters listed on this page must not be of an argumentative nature. You do not need to be a member of Esperanza (or this program) to place or fulfill requests on this page. If you don't have any requests, consider coming by and fulfilling a few! This program has not been very active, but has lots of potential!
What's New?
In order to help proposed programs become specific enough to make into full-fledged programs, the In development section of the proposals page has been created. Proposals that are promising, but need to be organized in more detail are listed here. Please take a look at what is there, and help the proposals turn into programs.
To improve both the layout and text of the front page, in an attempt to clarify the image of Esperanza, the front page is going to have some redesigning take place. Please take your creative minds to Wikipedia:Esperanza/Front page redesign to brainstorm good ideas.
Many thanks to MiszaBot, courtesy of Misza13, for delivering the newsletter.
  1. In order to make sure all users who join Esperanza are welcomed, a list of volunteers who are willing to welcome new Esperanzians is at Wikipedia:Esperanza/Members#Esperanza_welcomers. Please add yourself if you are interested; we want to make sure all new Esperanza members are welcomed!
  2. The In development section of the proposals page has been created.
  3. Proposals page: Some proposals have been moved to the aforementioned "In development" section, some have been left as a proposal, and others have been archived. For those proposals that were a good idea but didn't necessarily constitute a program, General Esperanzial Actions has been created.
  4. Two small pieces of charter reform will be decided on in a straw poll at Wikipedia talk:Esperanza/Governance. One involves filling the position of any councillors who may leave, the other involves reforming the charter.
  5. Until cooperation with the Kindness Campaign is better defined, it remains as a proposed program.
  6. There is a page for discussing the front page redesign.
Signed...
Although having the newsletter appear on everyone's userpage is desired, this may not be ideal for everyone. If, in the future, you wish to receive a link to the newsletter, rather than the newsletter itself, you may add yourself to Wikipedia:Esperanza/Newsletter/Opt Out List.

Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikify/Page wikified

MfD? What do you say? I was aghast when I saw this after this - CrazyRussian talk/email 17:41, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user page. —Mets501 (talk) 23:15, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for August 14th

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Volume 2, Issue 33 14 August 2006 About the Signpost
Editing for hire leads to intervention Meetups And Newsworthy International Assemblages
Report from the Chinese Wikipedia News and notes
Wikipedia in the News Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs and Internal Operational News The Report On Lengthy Litigation
Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View RSS Shortcut : WP:SIGN

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:26, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sumgait Massacre

Hi, since you locked up the article, do you think you can pay a trip to the talk page and help mediate with us. Francistyers has done a good job and helped us alot. He essentially said it was alrite to use the Sumgait Tragedy book which the article hinges itself on so long as it doesn't give undue weight upon it. However, the lack of a 3rd party makes the arguments useless since both of us are locked in one position. I listed some argument points on the bottom half of the article which give enough credence to use the witnesses' book since most of the information cited in the book is backed up by a plethora of evidence (although much of that evidence is not enough to explain things in depth which, hence, require the use of the book which gives a much more detailed account of the event) that even other "neutral" books use as sources.--MarshallBagramyan 06:33, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was hoping perhaps you can personally participate on the article's talk page or perhaps advise a fellow friend who can take part in the discussions as a 3rd party. Thank you.--MarshallBagramyan 17:49, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry Yankee for continously posting this, but your participation as 3rd party will be highly valued in the article and I hope you can take some time to help mediate between us since virtually no progress is being made and talks are being stalled due to the fact that the opposing side is presenting confusing, contradictory, and incoherent claims against the article's content. Thank you. --MarshallBagramyan 17:50, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding my IP Address

Please stop vandalizing Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Pilotguy (roger that) 00:35, 2 August 2006 (UTC)


I would like to bring to your attention that I did not have a functioning computer from Mid-June to August 4th. Does this regard only myself or all users of the IP Address? Sorry, I am new to this.

Re: message concerning IP Vandalism on WP:AN

Thanks for that help, Yanksox, concerning the 2 IP's I posted there. The reason I skipped t1 t2 and t3, was that the stuff was quite offensive, my opinion only, and it was obvious they were out to vandalise. Thats why I went for {{blatantvandal}} rather than applying a test marker. Regards, and thank you once again. Its people like you that restore faith to RCP'ers!!! Thor Malmjursson 16:38, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rosemarie Skaine page edit

Hey, just curious about your edit to this page. I recommended it for speedy deletion as being a bio page which didn't claim notability. You prodded it for notability and removed the speedy delete tag. I'm wondering why - mostly so I can understand and improve myself. --Cassavau 21:21, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Hello

=P Don't make me think about it. :P review me instead. I love you. :) (Logging off to work on that damn thing - 50 pgs left) Srose (talk) 22:15, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

 You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

Yanksox 22:51, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

uh... By the way, I don't think it's normal to block unless you've been warned by {{3RR}}. Cya in 3 hours bud. alphaChimp laudare 22:53, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Meh, I realize that, but I did violate it nonetheless. Whatever, I'm sure I'll get a few odd glances, but I think it was affecting me negatively, so I'll just cool down. =) Yanksox 22:55, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think I've cooled down, I've unblocked myself. Now, I'm going to get some work done. Yanksox 23:12, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Erm, good to cool down. :) Tyrenius 01:30, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Have a great break Yank! =) alphaChimp laudare 01:40, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
zomg!!1! Admin abuse! You have unblocked yourself. Please recall yourself and commit seppuku. - CrazyRussian talk/email 01:44, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Scytho-Iranian theory

I am asking to Overturn and, optionally protection of the contents from vandalism.

Thank you, Barefact 22:31, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Scytho-Iranian theory on deletion review

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Scytho-Iranian theory. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, your reasons on how or why you did so will be greatly appreciated in the above review.

Scytho-Iranian theory

Scytho-Iranian theory is up for DRV. Whispering(talk/c) 23:00, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok?

You okay Nick? -- Samir धर्म 00:40, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not block

Tomphil, please do not block this IP address. I'm very sorry about the vandalism that I appear to be doing, but the vandalism is actually a result of several different people's edits. This IP is that of a guest computer in a hotel, and therefore there is no real way to trace vandals from here. Again, my apologies, 192.251.125.85

Graeme Park

Hi, I am an official representative from Graeme Park and authorized to use the text from our website on wikipedia.

That's wonderful, but means absolutely nothing unless you can prove it. Unfortunately we can't just "accept" what you say, as copyright law does not allow it. --Lord Deskana (talk) 15:45, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am from the wesite, you can check my email addy and see that I am associated with the site and the state of pennsylvania, who owns the site, but forget it. Just trying to help spread some information on an interesting guy the world might not know about, but I'm not about to rewrite the whole thing for the sake of making it different when it has already been written and approved by our board.

How exactly do I "prove it" - my email which I provided when I signed up is a legitimate email. What more do you want.

A notice on the website that says the content on it is allowed to be used under GFDL. Anything short of that would really be insufficient, as we can't really risk being sued. --Lord Deskana (talk) 15:55, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For all those interested please also read: User talk:Graemepark. Yanksox 15:57, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

?

I thought you were painting? Srose (talk) 16:01, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Check le email, minu armsam. I'd also really, really appreciate it if you'd review me. Be harsh if you must. I'd like some input. :P Oh, and good job handling the Snakes on a Plane situation. I'm observing. Srose (talk) 21:51, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Persistent Systems AfD

I appreciate the difficulty of closing AfDs. Howver, I should be grateful if you would look again at this article. Only one editor 'voted' against and he did not address my notability reference. Further, 2,600 employees is very big for an IT company. BlueValour 16:20, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Persistent Systems on deletion review

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Persistent Systems. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, your reasons on how or why you did so will be greatly appreciated in the above review. BlueValour 17:27, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of image

Dear Yanksox,

I hope you are willing to help me, or at least give some advice. Some time ago you semi-protected File:Hassan Nasrallah Hezbollah.jpeg, since an anon user tagged it as unlicensed and refused to raise his concerns on the talk page. I assume you saw the talk page, where several editors agreed that the image was within the fair use license. Some days later I realized suddenly that the image had been deleted. No concerns had been raised at its talk page. As you can see at User_talk:Angr#Unilateral_deletion_of_licensed_image I contacted the administrator who deleted the pic. He found personally that the pic didnt meet the fair use criteria (even though they specificaly state that billboards are coveres), and he didnt bother to raise the concerns on the talk page or list the picture for deletion so it could be contested. Honestly, such unilateral deletions are not fruitful for creating an atmosphere of willingness to contribute. So I would like to get you advice on what to do. Should I just stop uploading pics, since any administrator unilaterally can delete it without reasoining? Or can the the pic be restored, and thus be subject for it salleged copyvio? Sorry to sraw you into this. But I sincerely hope that you understand the frustrations such unilateral actions create, and help me solve the issue. Thank you. Bertilvidet 21:09, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

replied on my talk - CrazyRussian talk/email 04:08, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for taking the time to answer and giving the advice. I was not even aware of the existence of DRV. Bertilvidet 08:20, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My new box

Do you like or is ittoo much? - CrazyRussian talk/email 04:25, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Happy

Happy that it was just being busy. I'm becoming very adept at the art of multitasking so I know exactly what that's like. I change into my scrubs in taxis, dictate consultation notes while waiting for my girlfriend to get ready (horrible, I know). Hope the rest of the summer goes well. Cheers -- Samir धर्म 05:42, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

deleting without discussion is close to vandalism

Seleting without discussion is close ot vandalism. Last deletion in Spaniards.

Nope, it was with discussion on the talk page of White People and everyone agrees it just didn't make sense to add it. Thanks, Yanksox 14:30, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

JFK II: The Bush Connection nominated for deletion

The article JFK II: The Bush Connection, which you tagged as needing its importance explained, has been nominated for deletion. You can contribute to the discussion at: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JFK II: The Bush Connection The JPStalk to me 14:32, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

re: Copyrights

Heck yeah dude! I like it quite a bit actually. So... thanks for helping me get the tools to do it! Do you know a good place to read about how to do image copyrights? --Aguerriero (talk) 14:38, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Basically, if someone uploads a copyrighted image and doesn't provide a fair use rationale, it can be deleted, right? --Aguerriero (talk) 14:58, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Closing Move Requests

I see you're getting around to some of the move requests. However, I would request that when you close a move request you remove the {{move}} template from the relevant talk pages. It would also be a good idea to somehow close off the survey section. That can easily be done by doing something like... 

{{subst:polltop}} '''result''', with explanatory reason if necessary. ~~~~

==Move Request==

===Survey===
blah blah

===Discussion===
blah blah

{{subst:pollbottom}}

That puts a wonderful green box around the section (similar to the grey box around the above code). Sorry if you actually knew this already; carry on with clearing the backlog. -- tariqabjotu 15:24, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I came here to advise you to do the same thing. Otherwise, people keep adding their opinion to the survey even though the matter is done with. I also usually remove extraneous stuff from it before I close it, e.g. the instructions about how to make a vote under "Survey" and the "Discussion" section if it is empty. If the only comment is by one person, I usually forgo the poll templates and just reduce the section it to his single comment with a "Done. --Centrx sig" from me, so it doesn't look like a poll anymore anyway. But that's just me. —Centrx→talk • 16:18, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The original barnstar

Thanks very much indeed for this, which I certainly consider an honour (or maybe an honor) coming from such a commendable editor and admin. You obviously noticed that I didn't have the original one! If you have any time (unlikely) you might like to check out Talk:Michael_Ignatieff, where I have trying out a method of dispute resolution to stop endless rambling conversations by getting editors to focus on the precise points in question, each with a separate debate, i.e. a structured approach. I think talk page hell is a major problem which needs addressing. Tyrenius 20:40, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

‘Abdu’llah ibn ‘Abdu’l-Muttalib

Hi Yanksox. I redirected back your page move to this page. There is an unresolved debate between Striver and I which has not been resolved. It's about how to transliterate Arabic properly, and Striver has basically made up his own version, where a plethora of standards exist, and an MOS exists for wikipedia on the subject. There have been few contributors to the debate and now it's at a standstill, with no real conclusion. I restored the page title to a version without errors.

See Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (Islam-related articles)/names and Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (Arabic) for more of the debate. Cuñado - Talk 00:59, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Favor++

Could you turn Yort into a #redirectYurt - and keep protected of course. Make it useful. - CrazyRussian talk/email 01:01, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Beat ya to it =). alphaChimp laudare 01:23, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Emmalina AFD closing comments

Having voted in the Emmalina AFD, I read with interest your comments in regards to the "Notability vs Privacy" debate. I was just wondering if you would have any idea where in Wikipedia one could go and discuss this issue? From what I've seen there are several policies and articles that engage in this discussion but I was wondering if there was one centralized talk page or such, rather than a number of fragmented areas. I'm interested to read what others think about this debate, so if you do know of such a place, it would be greatly appreciated. Regards, --Auger Martel 09:56, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your response. Much appreciated.--Auger Martel 13:20, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alte besen.jpg
Anybody say BROOM? - CrazyRussian talk/email 12:05, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sweeping the sox

The Yankees won 8-5 last night. Do you think they'll sweep? Mostly Rainy 11:50, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Go and ask them to take the Yank out of your username. You're not worthy of bearing it! - CrazyRussian talk/email 12:13, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
So do the right thing: Yanksox - CrazyRussian talk/email 12:17, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't know he was a Red Sox Fan. Maybe that is what you should be called. :) Nobugs 11:09, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My User Page

Hi Yanksox! The joke on my user page is currently being discussed. It would be nice of you to weigh in on this page instead of just deleting material from someone else's User Page without saying why you think it's "unreasonable."--The Fat Man Who Never Came Back 12:30, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think I made a good case here about why the incidents on my User Page should not be taken seriously. I don't want to upset all of you admins, so I will defer to your authroity as to what may or may not be posted on my user page, but I think you need to lighten up and try to discern more intelligently the difference between boneheaded, random insults and legitimate and quasi-legitimate threats to harm others.--The Fat Man Who Never Came Back 15:57, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense?

What about when the subject material is already nosense? I am sorry but I dont see how hello kitty's favorite word is 'friendship' and not 'Inadamit' —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 172.208.249.87 (talk • contribs) 13:58, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you

Thanks for the barnstar! I'd say you're quite deserving of a star or two yourself (although I trust you haven't been overlooked in that regard). I'm surprised to find I don't have your user page on my watchlist -- it is now, with your permission, so I'll be looking out for vandalism here when I'm on. Thanks again for the award! -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 20:23, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

how?

First, try to understand that i put that picture there so than i can resolve a edit war that's been going on for hours. Second, how does a screenshot of a website and of my browser violate fairuse? dposse 21:04, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Damnit, then it's goin to be impossible to resolve this stupid edit war. I don't understand how a screenshot of a video game is ok, but a browser is not. dposse 21:08, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Heh, alright. Look, i'm doing my best here to resolve this edit war peacefully, but it looks like as long as Guerillafilm keeps up this rant, you might as well protect it. That picture would have helped... dposse 21:13, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
unfortunatly, it looks like he doesn't ever look at his talk page. If he did, this edit war never would have happened. If you look at his page, i did my best to try to talk to him privately to back down from reverting. It didn't work. I'll add the picture to his userpage and the SoaP talkpage. dposse 21:17, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
thanks. dposse 21:20, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Roasting Users

Are you the second person to create fake pages in user space for a users RfA? Cause I did it to show if CrazyComputer is good with AfDs. I think it's the best way to show if a user knows their stuff or not, wouldn't you agree? :) --Andeh 18:32, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh dear I hope I haven't started anything!--Andeh 18:34, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well I hope it's just a one off thing, or everyone will start doing it!--Andeh 18:50, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Can I join your organization? Please?--Andeh 18:55, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
OK, where do I add my name?--Andeh 19:34, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
That'd interfere with the RfA, shall I create a seperate page?--Andeh 19:37, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
There.--Andeh 19:45, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to add some basic rules such as civility, please do.--Andeh 19:50, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Favor ++

Would you please clear Paul Summers so I could put a different one there? Thanks. - CrazyRussian talk/email 19:59, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thankee - CrazyRussian talk/email 20:12, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Crapwagon

here's a new CSD rationale: A6. - CrazyRussian talk/email 04:57, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Inasmuch as you need sleep, good night. Joe 04:59, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Again

I've blocked an IP, which could be your bot logged out[2]. If this is your bot, please remedy the situation. Thanks, Yanksox 23:34, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,
No, it is not my bot.
But is seems to have the same bug I had removing mk: links.
Regards,
Vargenau 06:15, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]


GuerrillaFilm block

Yanksox, I posted my idea for a civil discussion on Talk:Snakes on a Plane yesterday, and you're the only one who responded, so I think we should take charge and separate these people until they can calm down. I think that Guerrillafilm in particular needs to be blocked, if you look at his contributions in the last day, you can see that he is dominating the discussion so much that no one can get anything done. There may be some other users who need a time-out as well, but let's see what things are like without Guerrillafilm first. I have never asked an admin to block another user before. Usually, I stay out of drama like this, but the fact that the page isn't anywhere close to being unblocked is starting to bug me. Let me know what you think on my talk page. Thanks. Lovelac7 23:40, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you're willing to give these editors a second chance, so am I. I humbly withdraw my request. Lovelac7 03:19, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Huh?

Diff? - CrazyRussian talk/email 04:05, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

LOL. I had the French account since 2005. I just never bothered to link it. I figured YurikBot will hook me up - but he didn't. OT, now that Yurik is standing for a ru:RfA, he will w00tulate all the protected interwikis and be master of all with his 1,000,000 edits. - CrazyRussian talk/email 04:10, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Yanksox/archive8&oldid=72380531"