User talk:Vanished user 4afd12r8rh7r5t6r45tr41k8r54dtr56l0e

Welcome!

Hello, HardstyleGB, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! : Noyster (talk), 22:47, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit War on the Valencia Climate Table

Why are you changing the official climate normals for the period 1981-2010, when you don't even have a source for your climate normals of the period 2001-2010. 2001-2010 is also a too short time period. Here is the offical source for the 1981-2010 climate normals http://www.aemet.es/es/serviciosclimaticos/datosclimatologicos/valoresclimatologicos?l=8416&k=val --Guajara3718 (talk) 20:21, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes? And could you tell me please what's that. My invention? haha! I've just copied the climate chart from 2001-2010 from the article Climate of Valencia in the paragraph "climate" in the article of Valencia. I even didn't make that chart. The source? You can look it. Yes in fact that's the source for the mean averages during the 2001-2010 period and it's from the recordings of the meteo station of AEMET of the city of Valencia during that period. But do what you want, in part you are right too so if you want revert the changes to your last edition. This is not the same case as 78.133.67.226 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) who only deleted (because he wanted) or he edited articles without any source. I've made a undo to your last edition because I thought that you are the same user but I've look at you profile and you are an old user. That's the climate chart from 2001 to 2010 with all official data from AEMET. But if you want, revert my last changes and update it to your edition from today, because the chart from 1981-2010 is also correct.

Regards. --HardstyleGB (talk) 20:50, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've undo my last edition and I only corrected a few info like "the normal minimums are from 4 to 12" because "2 to 12ºC" is not true, temps of 2ºC in the city of Valencia are very rare. In fact there are years in which the temperature don't falls under 4ºC in the city of Valencia (not the airport), you can check this at the weather stations of Wunderground.

Regards! --HardstyleGB (talk) 21:30, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Spain. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Elizium23 (talk) 05:43, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:HardstyleGB reported by User:Ogress (Result: ). Thank you. Ogress _smash! 18:16, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Valencian. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. First thing you do after your 48-hour block is to return to this article, revrt to your prfereed version, ignore the talkpage-explanation, and even command me "Don't revert my changes this time." I've informed EdJohnston. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 19:51, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

HardstyleGB, If you continue to make edits at Valencian that have no support from others you may be indefinitely blocked from Wikipedia. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 20:01, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lanzarote

Hi. Just wanted to explain the change I made on the Lanzarote article. I changed what you have added back because it disagreed with the referenced cite which says that Arrecife has a Köppen Classification of Tropical and Subtropical Desert Climate.

If you have a better cite that says it is "hot desert climate" then please include it. Thanks. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 17:29, 13 February 2016 (UTC) --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 17:29, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That source is not official, and "subtropical-tropical desert climate doesn't exist" as a climate classification, but anyways Escape Orbit even that source which you are saying, which is the source from Lanzarote page, says that the climate is BWh, and BWh stands for hot desert climate under Köppen climate classification (check it if you don't believe). Here^[1] and here^[2] you can check that they define the climate as BWh; but as "weatherbase", they aren't authoritative at all. It's BWh because it meets all the requeriments to be considered this kind of climate, BWk means cold desert climate, while Lanzarote has warm and pleasant temperatures during all the year. But I will return to the last edition of subtropical-man, because "subtropical-desertic climate bordering a tropical climate" is accepted because it defines well the climate of the city. Anyways, in your last edition you've deleted various things which were before my changes, and also you've deleted true information like the one related with the rain, you can check it by yourself on the official climate chart that you have below. Why you did revert my changes if this was sourced with the official climate chart from below? Then, we have the Köppen climate classification guide, and according to this guide, Arrecife has an hot desert climate. Why? Because as you can see, the precipitation patterns go under the classification of a desertic climate. Then, BWk is not true for Arrecife, look at places with cold desert climates and then compare them... This climate better can entry under the description of mild desert climate because it's highly influenced by the Atlantic Ocean, but cold desert climates have very cold winters, while Arrecife's climate is warm and pleasant during all the year. Also, BWk holds for the centre of Gran Canaria and Tenerife islands, in places located at high altitudes, look at the map that you've put by yourself (the map of Köppen climate classification) only the center of those 2 islands are marked with pink... Also that image is in a big scale, you can determine which kind of climate is by searching for the climate standards under Köppen's classification... And Lanzarote island it's not BWk because all year average is above 18ºC (the annual average is above 21 degrees, check it on the official source of AEMET). Check it by yourself on the guide. Please Subtropical-man read better the description of BWk climate and search climate examples with that climate. For example Nukus has a cold desertic climate. It's averages during January are close to -5ºC, Lanzarote is close to 18ºC. Those are only explicative examples, as I've said before, please search for the definition of cold desert climate on Köppen climate classification. Regards.

--HardstyleGB (talk) 22:48, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

HardstyleGB, please stop edit warring. Canary Islands is not BWh (see File:Koppen_World_Map_BWh.png) but BWk - see map: File:Koppen_World_Map_BWk.png.

Sorry but you need to check better the definition of Wikipedia:Edit warring, because you are making it. It's NOT BWk, just look at the definition of cold desert climate and hot desert climate by yourself. Hot desert climates (BWh) are the desert climates with annual averages above 18ºC and Winter averages above 0ºC. Lanzarote has an annual average less than 18 degrees and a winter with less than 0 degrees? Not, right? Then, why you still reverting my changes if you are contradicting the Köppen climate classification ?? You can check it at the own source from the climate page of Lanzarote, they define it as BWh^[3]. If this source and the description of desert climate according to the Köppen climate classification aren't enough for you , just use the common sense. If cold desert climates are those ones with cold winters and annual averages under 18ºC... How could Lanzarote enter here? Where is the place in Lanzarote with less than 18 degrees of annual average or with winters with temperatures under 0ºC? Please source it, and then I will accept your changes. You're contradicting the source and Köppen climate classification...

Besides, before the new changes - consensus, according to the Wikipedia:CYCLE. If you re pushing your new controversial changes without consensus, you will be reported to Wikipedia:Administrators, cause: edit-warring and pushing the new controversial changes despite opposition, without discussion and consensus. This is last warning. Until the consensus, your new changes have been reverted. Subtropical-man talk
(en-2) 17:36, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry but you're the one which is contradicting Köppen climate classification and the source from the climate of Lanzarote page^[4] and also you can't say me "final warning" because it's the 1st time that you warn me and also you're the one which is contradicting the source.

--HardstyleGB (talk) 22:48, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ISTAT

ISTAT is the official site for statistic data in Italy.Stop writing newspaper data. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.40.129.57 (talk) 17:31, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

True, but if you put "istat.it" as a source it's not valid for nothing. That's the main page of the official website of Italian Istat's statistics. But it doesn't say anything about an average wage of 2.033€. What you don't understand? Put a voracious source where it says the official amount of the wages and it will be ok. But that's not a source, that's a vandalised edition. Regards --HardstyleGB (talk) 17:33, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You write amico to other people.I don't know you luckily.151.40.129.57 (talk) 17:52, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://www.lanzarote.climatemps.com/

[2] ttp://es.climate-data.org/location/881069/

[3] [1]

[4] [2]

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]